similar to: Multivoip 3010

I have three ethernet card and two of them connected to diffrent ISP and has diffrent gateways. And one ethernet card is connected to local lan. I have installed iptables and configured the firwall to work as nat gateway for the users. Now I want to route only mail traffic to the perticular ISP and which I am not able to do it. I have done iproute configuration what ever lartc said. But still I

I am usong three ehternet cards eth0 , eth1 , eth2 and eth0 and eth2 is connected to two diffrent ISP and eth1 is connected to local lan. I am tring to route all the mail traffic to eth1 and I have followed the lartc doc. But it seems the solution does not work for me . is there a way I could connect two diffrent ISP in one linux box with diffrent gateway address and dns. Thanks Imthiyaz

I've been working with the old-style (pre-SIP) MultiTech MultiVOIPs, trying to make them work against chan_h323. With the voips in rfc2833 mode, Asterisk can detect DTMF fine from them, but when it sends DTMF to them, they lock up on the second digit, crying about an incoming fax. Has anyone encountered that problem (and found a solution)? Taking the other route, switching DTMF to inband on

Hi anyone using sangoma hardware with lartc? pls let me know Thanks Imthiyaz Original Message: ----------------- From: lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 12:00:07 +0200 (CEST) To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl Subject: LARTC Digest, Vol 28, Issue 23 Send LARTC mailing list submissions to lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit

Hi, I am using sangoma S5141 wan card. I have connected my modem to the card in linux machine. The linux distribution I am using is Redhat AS 4, I am trying to replace the cisco router in my office with the sangoma S5141 wan card. I have configured the card in CHDLC where I can able to ping the serial IP, but with 80% of packet loss. And If I browse any http or ftp or any sites I cant able to

Dear folks, Here goes my bandwidth manager: INTERNET | |eth0 202.14.41.1 BW.Manager | | | +----eth1----192.168.1.0/24 | +------eth2----192.168.2.0/24 Total incoming bandwidth to eth0 is 1024kbps should be shared to eth1 and eth2, which mean each get 512Kbps and burstable to 1024Kbps if other host is idle. My question is how do i apply HTB to these situation ? As far as i know eth1 and eth2

I forward this to the list also, I attached SFQ leaf to parent class, and add QUANTUM value and PERTURB value. It worked! i tried 20hosts borrowing from the same parent, no problem. Each host get its own allocated bandwidth. Btw about last email sent to this list asking about QoS, i ve read LARTC document but i cant find the solution matches my case. Need help.. I have 100Kbit allocated to

Original Message: ----------------- From: Stef Coene stef.coene@docum.org On Saturday 19 April 2003 12:10, GoMi wrote: >> Stef, if you are interested in working around this problem, maybe we >could >> meet in a chat room, and you can login to my box and see what happens, >> interested? >Yes, but not now. But I can check it out myself. >How do this DAP works? Do they

Kazaa, DAP, FlashGet, or anything that can consume high bandwidth welcome. I am not affraid anymore my clients open any program like that. With HTB qdisc every host get its allocated bandwidth fairly. The key is in SFQ leaf, with QUANTUM and PERTURB value that you must set correctly according to your needs. I am not so sure if you should create each host in one single class. I want to try my

We have an application for Asterisk that will require connecting 144 fax ports into the system. Faxes will route externally over a PRI. The 144 ports are for local fax machines within the building. Not all will be faxing simultaneously. We just need to be able to provide ports in the building to plug in lots of fax machines. The plan is to run an Asterisk server for about 100 phones and these

Sorry if I post in this forum, this may be not the right one, but I hope to find in here some experts which could help me out. I have in one location 8 extensions from a Panasonic PBX ?KX-TD1232? connected to FXO Ports on an MultiVoIP Gateway from Multitech. On the other location I have 8 SP5100 IP-Phones from Micronet as remote extensions. Between the locations I have a VPN.

Hi, I am tring to us ip route to load balance between two interfaces. ip route add equalize 10.200.1.0/24 nexthop via 10.200.0.2 dev neta nexthop via 10.200.0.2 dev neta2 Where neta and neta2 are gre tunnels. Testing show that packets travel in a single sided manner. Do I need to use the multipath (IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_CACHED) module? thx jason

In the mailing list archives, I found a message that indicates that the IAXy has the ulaw, alaw, and g726 codecs, but I cannot find anything official on Digium's site about it. The Installation Manual has an example iax.conf file that indicates the ulaw codec, so I know that one is good. But we are thinking about using the IAXy over a VPN, to replace our MultiVoip. alaw and ulaw are

Hi, I''m tring to compile iproute2-2.4.7-now-ss020116-try.tar.bz2 whith kernel 2.6.5 and I''m getting these error: root@localhost:/home/oluap/iproute2# make make[1]: Entering directory `/home/oluap/iproute2/lib'' make[1]: Nada a ser feito para `all''. make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/oluap/iproute2/lib'' make[1]: Entering directory

Hi All, I have a strange problem that I don't understand. I have an access file which has the following line: 168.144.250.215 OK # xsmtp02.mail2web.com Yet email from this IP address is getting rejected. From my log file Oct 15 21:52:33 mx01 sendmail[10569]: ruleset=check_relay, arg1=xsmtp02.mail2web.com, arg2=168.144.250.215, relay=xsmtp02.mail2web.com

Hi, I am tring to setup AF on my router using GRED/HTB. I plan to mark and set the DSCP with iptables and the ingress qdisc to set the tc_index for the proper GRED vq(1-12). My question is: Is there a way to allow for priority between the af classes and within the af classes? also would it be possible to to the following: HTB(6Mb) | GRED(1)grio HTB1 (af1) (1MB) GRED(1-3)grio |

Dear Friends, I do require centos 4.2 x86_64 cds here in delhi,India. If anyone of you can arrange that for me i will be vary grateful. The requirement is urgent. Thanks for your time and effort. -- Regards Abhishek Jain -------------------------------------------------------------------- mail2web - Check your email from the web at http://mail2web.com/ .

OK, I've downloaded and unzipped the firmware files in ipw2200-fw-3.0.tgz - so I have 4 files: ipw2200-bss.fw, ipw2200-ibss.fw, ipw2200-sniffer.fw and LICENSE.ipw2200-fw, all of which I've placed in the /lib/firmware directory. Unfortunately, the instructions in README.ipw2200 and INSTALL are not clear as to what to do next. I'm using CentOS 5 on my (Dell) laptop so setting-up wireless

Hi, I am trying to get an fedora core 2(samba-3.0.3-5) export mounted as cifs on a fedora core 3 test 1(kernel-2.6.7-1.478, samba-3.0.5-0pre1.0). It always gives an error operation not permitted. [root@ayanami1 root]# mount -t cifs -o user=moo,password=cow //ayanami3/ moo /mnt/cow mount error 1 = Operation not permitted Refer to the mount.cifs(8) manual page (e.g.man mount.cifs) I

Evening everyone. I am going to be changing our current Samba PDC running Red Hat, to a FreeBSD server. I was curious if anyone out there, who is currently using FreeBSD as a PDC could give me their feedback on how it is working. Also, if they had any suggestions or recommendations regarding Samba on FreeBSD. Maybe even what they like and dislike about it. I would imagine, it should be the