similar to: Two upstream gateways, only use one unless it fails?

> Message: 1 > Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2006 00:06:08 -0400 > From: Kevin White <kwhite@telsource.com> > Subject: [LARTC] Two upstream gateways, only use one unless it fails? > To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl > Message-ID: <4525D630.1040401@telsource.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > I''m looking at setting up a system with

To begin with I have not applied and am not using the patches provided by Julian Anastasov. http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/~julian/ I do not believe at the moment they apply to the problem I am having. If they are I will go through the process of applying the patch. They mostly have to due with what happens when a connection dies. At the moment both of my connections are live, and I am having

Hello, I have configured a load balancing router using Julian''s patches and as described in "nano.txt" for two ISP links as shown below. ISP 1 ISP 2 . . | | | | | | | WAN

Hi! (I sent other mails some time ago, about not-using the Julian''s patches). When I try the configuration from Nano.txt, having the Julian''s patches applied, only the first ''hop'' of the routing table "222" is used (according to tables shown in Nano.txt). I saw that this question was asked some time ago, with no answer. Maybe someone can tell me the

Hi William. Thanks a lot for your help. Im having some trouble recompiling my kernel after a installed the patch. Im running RH 7.3 with kernel 2.4.18-3. The patch I installed is routes-2.4.16-6.diff. I got no errors installing it. I added the multipath support, and recompiled it. The make dep and the make bzImage went fine. I got error during the make modules. These are the errors:

Greetings, I''m trying to set up some sort of load-balancing on a Linux (Trustix) gateway by using multipath routes, however I''m stuck with some problems. The idea is that this gateway (odd as it may seem) only has one external interface, which should route packets to two different gateways (Ciscos). The gateway''s external interface and the routers are all on the same

Hello Will someonekindly update me on whether julians''s patch is now a standard feature on the linux kernel release? Is there a decision to provide the same feature but re-worked in some way (i.e out-of the-box dead gateway detection for example) in a future release. Or do I still need to patch the latest kernel release, and do all the "stuff" as explained in the

Dear List. I try to build multipath connection w/ load balance to internet with two different gateway; My system is RH-8.0 with iproute-2.4.7-7.90.1.rpm and Kernel-2.4.26 (patching with Julian A. patch),and follow guide from http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/~julian/nano.txt, The problem is; when i try to connect to Internet form gateway machine it;s success , but only one interface is

Previously I attempted load balancing between 3 interfaces with limited bandwidth but a common gateway with much more bandwidth using QoS and teql. This had little to know luck because routes never seemed to come out right. Someone pointed me in the direction of http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/nano.txt to try and set up a multipath route instead. After setting this up it seems that all of the routes are

Hello, On Mon, 17 May 2004, Charles-Etienne.Dube wrote: > I did some tests with 2 cable modems, but now it is installed in a production > environment with 4 cable modems. At first, everything seemed to work fine.. > But now I had a couple of users tell me that some web pages were > not available while others were, and it semms to be a masquerading problem > since when I

I am running 2.4.20 with Julian Anastasov''s patches (routes-2.4.20-9.diff), iptables v1.2.6a, iproute2-ss010824 on Debian. I have set up our internal gateway to multihome 2 T1''s as described in http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/~julian/nano.txt . The only difference is that I use multiple IP''s on the external interfaces. EXA A.B.C.225 --------------------

I have a private lan that is connected to the world via 3 dsl lines. I put up a linux box that handles all the dsl lines, lan gateway and all is working well...until...one of the dsl lines goes down. My routing table is: x.x.x.x dev ppp0 proto kernel scope link src x.x.x.x x.x.x.x dev ppp1 proto kernel scope link src x.x.x.x x.x.x.x dev ppp2 proto kernel scope link src x.x.x.x

First of all i wanna thanks Christoph Simon for the support. Only after his reply to my email i could see the real solution to the problem (Valeu mesmo cara... me ajudou pra caramba! Fico te devendo essa!) :) Here is what i learned in a month of research: I tried A LOT of things to do load balance, including the one at LARTC homepage. The only tutorial that REALLY works in my case is the

Ok ive been trying to get this to work for about half a year now. Ive searched all over the internet for a solution for my problem. Ive found some solutions, but they only led me to yet more problems. What we want to do is the following: I live in a student complex with 7 other people. Every room has its own internet connection from the same ISP. Ip, gateway, subnet are asigned through dhcp on

Hi folks, i spent my whole day trying to set up my linux router using load balancing with multiple uplinks. I mainly focused on the nano howto, but somewhere I have a big mistake within my head. Basically the load-balancing is working, but not on a per-connection basis - just on a per packet basis. Practically this is not usable of course <g> But as far as I understood it should work..

--------------eth0---80.48.56.70---------- -------------80.48.56.65 ISP | my | router1 | | | linux | | | router2 ------------eth1---192.168.200.10----- ----------------192.168.1.1 ISP I''ve two ip from my isp one public and one internal. ISP have two routers router1 is gw for public ip and router2 is gw for internal

Hi list gurus, long story short we have firewall machine which is the default gateway for our clients and firewall send traffic out to Internet via cisco router. On cisco we have two serial interfaces 1Mb and 2Mb. On firewall #route add default gw xxx.xxx.xx.xxx (for 2mb) #route add default gw xxx.xxx.xx.xxx (for 1mb) and the same rule for Imb link route packets via these two links. However I

Hello. I have the problem that I have two gateways on the same subnet, 80.237.244.1 and 80.237.244.33. Both gateways are 100 MBit cards, so I have 2 times 100 MBit to the Internet. The NIC in the server is a gigabit-card, so this card is easy able to use both gateways for outgoing traffic. Now I just want to use both gateways for my outgoing traffic but no matter what I do, it doesnt work. I

I administer a nano-setup on a dorm-network with a couple of hundred active users. The setup uses 2 x 2 2Mb/s DSLs, meaning two DSLs from each of two different ISPs. It works fine except for some minor glitches: https-sites often kicks users. This was solved by tying outbound https to a single DSL. Not the best solution but it works so far that users dont kicked from the sites anymore. Now

A site I administer has dual T1''s. We have this set up according to NANO-HOWTO[1] using Julian''s routes patch on a late model 2.4 kernel. All is well, has been working well for a long time. Recently one of our T1 providers went belly up and we got something better. Now we have a /28 where previously we only used one IP per interface. Present interfaces: eth0 - T1#1, single