similar to: Re: Standalone Shaping

Hello, I''m trying to get lossless VoIP traffic over my 3000k/500k ADSL line. Shaping outgoing traffic is no problem: I set total ceil for outgiong device (ppp0) to 450kbit and put VoIP into highest prio class. Even during full upload the voice is clean on the other end. Now I tried to get the same result for incoming data. I attached HTB to eth1 where the incoming voip traffic is

Hello, I have begun to use the tc scripts since 2 weeks ago, so I am beginner. I am trying to divide my bandwidth in 4 independent ones. Each of these sub-bandwidths is assigned to 4 different groups of ip. Bandwidth sharing is allowed. I put a Linux with two Ethernet card between the router and the LAN. Eth1 is the card connected to the router and eth0 is the one connected to the LAN. My ISP

Hello, I run one of my PCs as my personal router, with iptables+tc to control traffic and be my firewall. In TC, I use a combination of htb, qdisc and sfq (as well as prio) to classify bandwidth. In my current setup, I have 10 classifications of my bandwidth. (Even I admit this is probably more than I need, but at this point I''m still learning, so I''ll just leave them be.)

On 2/19/07, Salatiel Filho <salatiel.filho@gmail.com> wrote: > Well , thanks to imq all my client machines are now shaped and > everything is great ... > But now i have a doubt , is there a way to shape the traffic that goes > to the route [doing a wget from the router for example ]? > > > I have a PREROUTING IMQ0 and a POSTROUTING IMQ1 , everything is > working like

I''ve set up Traffic Shaping on a Linux Router. Using HTB with SFQ, i''m trying to slow down heavy downloading for 20 subscribers over a 2048 kbit downlink. I''m classifying internet related traffic using iptables marking. bri0 is my local lan bridge, receiving egress traffic destined for subscribers. tc qdisc add dev bri0 root handle 1: htb default 2 tc class add dev

Hello What I''m looking for is how to configure the Linux QoS module to do global rate limitation for two (or more) 802.1q pseudo network devices. I naturally suppose there is a possibility with IFB. I don''t want to use IMQ because it''s not integrated to my kernel v2.6.21.1 and I didn''t find IMQ patches for it nor for the iptables package I use (v1.3.7).

Hello, I''m trying to get my shaper to work, but have only a partial success. Can someone help me with that. My setup unfortunately is not so trivial, but I think some people could have similar one... 1. There is a router connected to the internet line via interface eth0 2. There are users connected to the router via two interfaces : eth1 and wlan0 3. All users are assigned private IP

I have a setup where I have three NIC in a Debian box. I have eth1 conected to internet and eth0 NAT''ed to 192.168.1.1. eth1 and eth2 are bridged together, given ip 192.168.122.2. What I want to achieve is to perform traffic shaping on the bridge as well as prioritizing the traffic from eth0 very low. (This is from trental flat ...) However it seems that I am unable to perform thhe

Hello, I wrote a simple traffic shaping script (below) that should have allowed me to shape my internet traffic a bit (ppp0 - adsl 128kbit/64kbit; local interface eth0). The script works only partially - the speed is being limited but too much. Without running this script my download rate is about 10kBytes (with second computer also downloading at about 6kBytes). After running it my download speed

Hi, I´m shaping traffic using htb on both interfaces, I noticed that shaping download traffic is workinggreat but shaping upload traffic is not working at all (no sent packets, no dropped, no overlimits)I have eth0 facing the backbone and eth1 facing the LAN. Thanks for your help.These are the commands I run:tc qdisc del dev eth0 root tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1 htb default 10 r2q 5 tc

Dear list: I have a problem I cannot handle yet, and need to solve it as soon as possible. Would be very greatful with anybody who can help me. I have a 512/512 link to internet, that I want to share between several computers. I have eth0, with a public IP address, conected to Internet, and also, eth1, with a private IP address, for network with the surfing computers. I have a main class with

Hi, I have more ethernet cards. Egress shaping with HTB over eth0 works fine, ingress shaping with HTB over IMQ works also fine, but in both of cases I use only one class of traffic. Now I want to divide traffic to 3 classes on other interface (egress to ineternal network). I try this command sequense tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 1: htb default 12 tc class add dev eth1 parent 1: classid

If in one time 3 IP adresses using internet. TC script: DEV=eth0 # LAN SERVER_IP=192.168.1.2 # eth0 ip address tc qdisc add dev $DEV root handle 1: htb default 255 tc class add dev $DEV parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 384Kbit quantum 1500 tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:1 classid 1:20 htb rate 128Kbit ceil 384Kbit prio 0 quantum 1500 tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:1 classid 1:21 htb rate 128Kbit

Actually i gave up, i tried and tried and tried so many times, upgrading software falling back to an old version but it didn''t work, that''s it. i can''t do work together tc with iptables and iproute2 when i mark a packet with iptables tc doesn''t recognize them so it falls at the default leaf of the tc''s tree what i like is to mark packets depending on

Hi, I''m looking for info about IFB devices and how I can use it to incomming traffic shapping. Has IFB any web about it? Do any body known where I can find more info about it? I found this: http://linux-net.osdl.org/index.php/IFB But I can''t stand fine how to use it to allow many ifb''s devices or how to use it with "tc actions". Any help? Thanks --

Hello to all people there . Can i guarantee ICMP respond time no metter how loaded is internet line . i have typical NATed enviroiment like External IP |linux router| LAN - 192.168.0.0/24 i have example setup with IMQ but is it possible to be done also if i attache htb to eth0 and eth1 for example . if i start shaper ping i better that without shaper but it''s not guarantted i mean

I''m trying to shape each machine on an interface to 256k each, but I''m getting stuck and only able to shape an entire interface to 256k. What should I be doing differently here? tc qdisc del dev eth0 root tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 10 tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 100MBit ceil 100MBit tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:10 handle 110:

Hello! My system is: Internet ADSL(PPPoE) ---> ppp0 [LINUX server(router)] eth0 ---> LAN Server(router) is running on LINUX Slackware 8.1. I have recompiled a 2.4.22 kernel, enabled all QoS support in the kernel config, including HTB. My ADSL bandwidth is 256Kbit/s for download and 64Kbit/s for upload. I use the following HTB+IPTABLES configuration, because I want to reduce bandwith for

Hello. I have a 1024/256kbit ADSL and tried to shape outgoing traffic in order to improve latency. Here is my config. UPLOAD_RATE="256" UPRATE="$[4*$UPLOAD_RATE/5]" (a little smaller) UP70="$[7*$UPRATE/10]kbit" UP30="$[3*$UPRATE/10]kbit" UP20="$[2*$UPRATE/10]kbit" UPRATE="${UPRATE}kbit" IF="eth2" IPTABLES="iptables -t

I try to shape traffic using HTB and mark packets within iptables using PREROUTING. But the filterrules seems to ignore the marks set with PREROUTING Only POSTROUTING marks are accepted. First my configuration I have a router connected to the internet via ADSL over interface ppp0. eth0 is a tunnel to ppp0 and eth1 serves the LAN. LAN is 192.168.57.0/24 on 10Mbit ppp0 is 80.126.16.44 on