similar to: monitoring hosts from my lan

Hi all :) there is somekind of strange Routing problem that im getting with Linux-2.6.16 and iproute 2.6.16 , when i use command like : ip route add default nexthop via 1.1.1.1 dev eth0 nexthop via 1.1.1.2 dev eth1 all packets goes on 1.1.1.2 ( always last interface ) , whats is the problem ? this situation also tested with equalize flag , on two physical interface and etc ... -- Lady Luck

Hi, i want to do load balancing of 2 ISP's Everything is set up OK but one of the ISP's is loaded on 100% while the other is utilised on 1 - 5% I've read about Julians patches but they stop at 2.6.14. Is anybody aware of similar patches for higher patchlevels. 2.6.14 is not suitable for my setup Thanks for reading :) -- С уважение, Владимир Витков http://www.netsecad.com

I am trying to build a trafic control rule set for a huge NATed network, and I have it working for single known addresses but I need to scale it to 16M potential client addresses. I''m using iptables for NAT. Incoming traffic is simple because I can match destination address, outgoing traffic I use iptables IPMARK then tc match mark and it works perfectly if I build rules for each client

Hi list, i have the following situ 2 ISP's one internal network. Load Balancing between the ISP's (with mpath) I want to route speciffic traffic over only one of the ISP's more specifficaly the ICQ traffic i have the following configs iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -p tcp --dport 5190 -j MARK --set-mark 0x5190 ip ru a from xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx prio 201 t isp_rules1 ip ru a fwmark

I am investigating changing our broadband bandwidth control scripts over to HFSC. What I would like to accomplish is this: { * DOWNLOAD * I need a download class for each user (we''ll call it Class 1) that offers a minimum of lets say 384Kbps and a maximum of 1.5Mbps. The rates between 384Kbps and 1.5Mbps should be shared among all users. Each user should always be able to get at

This is my simple situation: I want to policy download and shape upload going through my router. It has two interfaces: eth0 (10.4.10.222/24 connected to LAN) and eth1 (172.16.0.1/24 connected to my laptop). My setup: [eth1] tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 1: htb default 999 tc qdisc add dev eth1 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 1Mbit tc filter add dev eth1 protocol ip parent 1:0 prio 1 u32 match

Dear All, I want to limit traffic that use by my client to download files directly from browser, I have already limit the traffic for the same purpose to ftp connection. But I don''t want to limit traffic that using for browsing the web. Can I do this with IMQ/HTB or any other method to make this happen. Thank You. Sorry my English is bad. RInto Exandi

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=741 Summary: ULOGD segfaults on init Product: ulogd Version: SVN (please provide timestamp) Platform: i386 OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: blocker Priority: P5 Component: ulogd_MYSQL AssignedTo: netfilter-buglog at lists.netfilter.org

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=793 Summary: ulogd -d does not close all fds Product: ulogd Version: SVN (please provide timestamp) Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ulogd AssignedTo: netfilter-buglog at lists.netfilter.org

quick background: RH9 (2.4.20-19.9) Shorewall 1.4.6a-1 ulogd 1.00 Shorewall is working properly. I''ve followed the FAQ instructions and everything appears to be setup correctly. The problem is that I''m trying to get ulog going...but I''m getting: # service ulogd status ulogd dead but subsys locked I''m not sure if I was suppose to, but I also manually created

http://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/Alpha/shorewall-2.0.0 ftp://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/Alpha/shorewall-2.0.0 See if this change to proxy arp is more palatable. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net

Hi List, I read this list for nearly two years and learnt a lot, but now i have a very strange problem I can''t solve.. I have a firewall machine running Debian, which connects a small office to the internet via a DSL-line (with pppoe) and which is running Shorewall. It allows all outbound traffic and accepts pptp, openvpn and ssh-connections (on a non-standard port) from the internet.

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=673 --- Comment #16 from Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo at netfilter.org> 2011-02-27 20:42:54 --- Have been this issue finally resolved? Please close the bug if so. We're bug hunting to reach final first ulogd 2.0 release. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this

I''m trying to get Shorewall to use ulogd for logging, but I''m not seeing any logging in either the file I set up for logs, nor in /var/log/messages (where the logs used to be). I''m running a stock Debian 3.0 woody system, with a custom 2.4.21 kernel. I used all the settings as described on shorewall.net when configuring the kernel. ulogd (0.97-1) and shorewall

Hi Guys I have install ulog and shorewall and edit the shorewall config file to use ulogd for logging, I have also compiled ulogd support into the kernel however I still cannot get shorewall to log through ulogd to file. It keeps dumping info to console. Any assistance would be appreciated. Thanks Craig

Hi List, I have just recently set up 2 mint systems with shorewall and have been using the script for a fair amount of time before that. What really ruined my day was the fact that the logging options for the chains'' Policies are in a different place than all the other logging options. I built my kernel with ulogd and spent hours looking for the config options of the policies. Now

Hello, I changed the log path in shorewall.conf, LOGFILE=/var/log/messages to LOGFILE=/var/log/shorewall, and then I touched the shorewall file in /var/log, permission root:root 600, after shorewall restart, no logging messages appear in /var/log/shorewall. so how can I fix this problem ? Thanks !! _______________________________________ YM - 離線訊息

Hello Everybody, I have configured a Linux box that does traffic shaping. Its working wonderfully fine, just as expected...Now i want to measure the bandwidth consumed by each of my hosts....But I dont want SNMP to run on all the hosts[as required by MRTG] I used iptraf on my linux box, but it only measures the bandwidth on interface basis only.... I tried installing traffic-vis, its not working

Evening all ... One of my servers just crashed with the "pmap_new_proc: u_map allocation failed" ... Looking at a ps of the vmcore file, I find: neptune# awk '{print $11}' /tmp/ps.crash | sort | uniq -c 1 (Xvfb) 1 (aac0aif) 1 (adjkerntz) 1 (analog) 1 (bufdaemon) 4412 (cron) 8 (csh) 84 (ctl_cyrusdb) 3 (ctl_deliver) 1 (emacs) 1 (find) 1

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1194 Bug ID: 1194 Summary: Kill u 2 Product: ulogd Version: 1.21 Hardware: All OS: Ubuntu Status: ASSIGNED Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: ulogd Assignee: netfilter-buglog at lists.netfilter.org Reporter: