similar to: data validation

>Comment By: Luis Lavena (luislavena) > Date: 2007-05-04 23:37 > describe "An Asset" do > before(:each) do > @asset = Asset.new > end > > it { @asset.should have_one(:attachment) } > it { @asset.should have_present(:something) } > end Food for thought on these. I like have_one a lot. It speaks to me as a Rails developer and I think it speaks to

I''m using Sequel as my ORM and Test::Unit as my testing framework and have the following model: class Item < Sequel::Model validates do presence_of( :name, :uuid, :vendor_id, :vendor_reference, :amount, :currency_code ) uniqueness_of( :uuid ) end def initialize( *args ) super( *args ) self.uuid = UUID.random_create.to_s end end As you can see I overwrite

Hi, Correct me if I am wrong but there doesn''t seem to be an easy way to add validation outside the pre-built ones (validates_presence_of, validates_lenght_of, etc.). Ideally there should be something like: Class Person < ActiveRecord::Base validates :my_method, :on => create, :message => ''was not valid'' def my_method(param) false unless

I need validates_lenght_of validates lenght of UTF-8 strings and not just byte counting. Is there easier way than create my own validation method just validates_jlenght_of? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Hi Trying to get rcov going (has been working), but with the following context and specs it fails. context ''/account POST with invalid attendee'' do controller_name :account setup do Attendee.stub!(:create!).and_raise(ActiveRecord::RecordInvalid.new( Attendee.new)) end specify ''should raise on create'' do Attendee.should_receive(:create!).with({

I''m building a login system, and I want users to be able to update their password, first name and last name after signing up. So, when signing up password can''t be nil, and it must be between 6..20 characters long. However, on update, the user can choose to leave the password field empty (but fill in other stuff, like first name) and then I want the User model to not update

Hi, I''m looking at developing a reasonably complex web application, where most of the complexity actually lays in the database and the queries I need run on it. Some "classes" or models need to consist of an assembly of several tables. It would be trivial enough for me to code these queries in SQL, but as far as I understand Rails is trying to hide the database as

I''m trying to use stories to drive some high-level design. I''ve got some branching scenarios where I want to follow a scenario, to establish a base situation, and then have different scenarios which ''branch'' out from that state, possibly several levels deep. I asked a bit about this a few days ago, and David pointed out the rather undocumented GivenScenario

Hi, I''m a bit stuck with mocking a unit test of a join model with regards to a validates_uniqueness_of clause. I have class Book < AR:B has_many :clippings various validates_presence_of etc end class Clip < AR:B has_many :clippings various validates_presence_of etc end class Clipping < AR:B belongs_to :book belongs_to :clip validates_uniqueness_of :clip_id,

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > block 827061 with 828253 828367 828586 828309 828307 828513 812166 828412 828298 828277 Bug #827061 [release.debian.org] transition: openssl 827061 was blocked by: 828555 828359 828618 827076 828422 828459 828532 828330 828535 828313 828324 828547 828265 844311 835790 828533 828416 828394 828500 828255 828494 828395 828355 828443 828338

Package: xen Version: 4.6.0-1 Severity: important User: debian-gcc at lists.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-6 gcc-6-misleading-indentation This package fails to build with GCC 6. GCC 6 has not been released yet, but it's expected that GCC 6 will become the default compiler for stretch. Note that only the first error is reported; there might be more. You can find a snapshot of GCC 6 in

I''ve been running edge_rails on ruby 1.8.2 for a while pretty successfully. Today, I decided to unfreeze_rails, install the new gem for 1.1 and then while I was at it, upgrade to Ruby 1.8.4. I did the whole configure, make, make test, make install. When I fired up rails, I started getting all sorts of errors:

Just sharing an experience with you all -- hopefully you take better precautions than I do. :-) I have a few sites built with Rails 0.8.3 that were ugpraded to 1.0. The newer sites are on edge rails. So when I heard 1.1 had come out, I unfroze my new apps, and installed the new gem for Rails 1.1. The sites that was operating on edge rails worked just fine. However, the sites that were working

I''ve gotten eager associations to work before, but for some reason this isn''t working out for me this time. I''ve been scratching my head but can''t quite figure out the nuances of what works and what doesn''t work. I''ve got 3 models: profile, widget_configuration and widgets profile.rb -- has_many :widget_configurations

Hi, I have 3 tables with HABTM relation. USERS -> QUOTE_TO_USER <- QUOTES Table QUOTE_TO_USER has 3 attributes: quote_id, user_id, component. I have a form where I can tie multiple users to QUOTE. This is easy one, thru "user_ids" (@quote[:user_ids] = @params[:quote][:user_ids]). In this form I have all users and I just check those I want to tie to this quote, however

Hi! I have two, not too related questions: - the probably simpler one: if anyone can help me out using a Cisco 7905G with chan_sccp? I did already managed to get it working with a SIP image, I'd just like to see it work with this one as well. It's probably something I screw up with the configuration, as the phone registers, only I don't get any lines with it, although I have it