similar to: Multipath routing

Hi I''m setting up shaping using HTB and hashkey. It seems like there is a limit on the number of classid''s at 10000? How can I go higher than 10000? This is what my output say when I reach classid number 10000: ... ... /sbin/tc class add dev eth0 parent 2:6 classid 2:9998 htb prio 5 rate 768kbit ceil 768kbit burst 0 cburst 0 /sbin/tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 2:9998 handle

Hello! I was always using "default" in HTB to choose default class, but now I need to do it with filters. Tried following command: # tc filter add dev eth0 protocol ip parent 10: prio 2 flowid 10:2 Unknown filter "flowid", hence option "10:2" is unparsable It is from example in LARTC Howto. My question is then - how to make a filter matching all without eating

Hello! I am using since yesterday ESFQ instead of N HTB queues. It mostly works OK, but when somebody is using one single sesion (for example downloading file via FTP), it gets weird speed. For example it is 20 kilobytes pres second, then drops down to 9, then 20 again, and then slowly to 0 and stops. But when using download accelererator of some kind or bittorrent client which uses many

Refering to pppoe i have next problem : I asked my isp if i can buy a class of real ip`s to be routed by them. They said elegantly it can`t be done . I want opinions . I am using an ADSL connection through a Speedtouch 510 configured in bridge. About Bgp : i asked someone if i can peer 2 different locations on 2 different ip`s using private asn number and he said yes , and what i don`t

Hi I have read various info, and mailing list archives, but have not found an answer to the following. I have a few servers with configurations similar to the following: They each have multiple uplinks to the Internet, and a sample config is as follows: eth1 is 192.168.0.1, connected to 192.168.0.2 eth2 is 192.168.1.1, connected to 192.168.1.2 My default route looks like: ip route add scope

Hello! Currently I am marking packets with IPMARK, and then using following rules: 1: class add dev eth0 parent 1:4 classid 1:100a htb rate $rate ceil $ceil quantum 1600 2: qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:100a handle 100a:0 sfq perturb 10 3: filter add dev eth0 protocol ip parent 1:0 pref 30 handle 4106 fw classid 1:100a 4: class add dev eth1 parent 1:2 classid 1:100a htb rate $rate ceil $ceil

Hello! I think 36th line of ipt_MARK which is (*pskb)->nfcache |= NFC_ALTERED; Should be removed. At least looking at that patch: http://lists.netfilter.org/pipermail/netfilter-devel/2005-July/020382.html -- Michał Margula, alchemyx@uznam.net.pl, http://alchemyx.uznam.net.pl/ "W życiu piękne są tylko chwile" [Ryszard Riedel]

Hello, I just setup a few virtual systems, and I came into some limitations using XEN. I''d like to share these, just to know if the limitations are in the system or in the user :) I am using a standard Debian 4.0 (etch) GNU/Linux distribiution. The system is an Intel Core 2 duo with virtualization inside. I use the amd64 flavour. Thus my kernel is

Hello, does anybody know if quagga for CentOS 5.3 is compiled with -enable-multipath? I want to implement ECMP over 2 ISP. Thanks, Cristi Carstea

Hello All, Does anyone happen to be running Quagga on CentOS 5 with SELinux in enforcing mode? Have you had to create SELinux policies or did it "just work" out of the box? (I'll get around to building this out on CentOS 6 as well.) I'm simply trying to write my config (for the zebra daemon) and it can't be written... Looks like this bug from Fedora 8 in 2008 [0] remains

I was wondering if anyone is running Quagga on Xen? What is throughput/latency like? Was looking for about a gig of mixed packet size BGP throughput. Hardware is Opteron 4 Way Quad cores, was thinking paravirt with a couple of dedicated cores and maybe the addition of Solarflare 10GB Direct IO NICs might give the required performance level but I am unsure. The other option is multi-queue Intel

Hi, I''ve setup quagga on a shorewall firewall server. The only purpose for this is to use BGP to connect to a "peering platform" supplied by our data centre supplier. There are some very large ISP''s (and other various providers including google) on this peering platform and connecting to it will speed up access to/from our services and hosted servers. The physical

Hey, I have a very trivial parsedfile based type - http://pastie.org/311146 - that works fine when deployed and run under puppetd -t. However, when being run by the daemonized puppet, it results in this error: Mon Nov 10 03:50:48 +0000 2008 //Node[ams-proxy-2]/quagga/Quagga::Daemon[zebra]/Quagga_service[zebra] (err): Failed to retrieve current state of resource: No ability to determine if

Hi folks, At work, we're considering the idea to replace the presente router with a stardard box with CentOS as a SO and GNU Zebra as a routing software. The line is a 4Mbps SDSL. ?What do you think about Zebra and what are your experiencies with it? Any feedback will be so appreciated. TIA.

Hi Everyone, I have a routing situation where Tinc looks like it could come in extremely useful, but I have a query I hope someone can cast an eye on, as I'm unsure whether Tinc can help me here. I currently have a Quagga OSPF linux router which connects LAN A to LAN B over the quickest available of two routes (both routes at both ends connect to Quagga boxes to prevent collisions). One of

Hi Michael, when I was looking for information on tinc in combination with IPv6, I also found your new tutorial at that time (earlier this month). Somehow a couple of things are less clear to me in the newer tutorial (maybe the nice network topology image is missing). OK, you added the unique local addresses to the setup. But I dont't get it how the routing is done in your setup. You

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi list, yesterday I sent this eMail to quagga mailing list, however I didn't receive an answer yet. Unfortunately, I really need this stuff running or have to switch to another strategy achieving the goals. Maybe one of you has some experience on this topic and can shed some light on it -- I really appreciate it. -

Hi, > Can you manually do on the xen interfaces what the scripts would? How about > doing it on some other interface configured in a similar way? Toying with the vif-route script, I might have found a workaround for this issue. If I disable the ifconfig and ip route commands from vif-route script, and bring up vif interface by hand later on, everything seems to work. In other works,

I'm looking for an open source router solution, and someone from the list recently recommended zebra (www.zebra.org). I haven't yet identified all my needs, but I'm guessing that it will do all my routing needs for a, say, class C set of IP addresses, particularly if I ever have to do anything BGP-related. Anyone have any pointers before I delve in? Or possibly a recommendation for

I''m getting an error when shorewall is trying to add the default routes for my multi-isp configuration. I''ve attached a shorewall dump... If anyone can give some input I''d appreciate it. RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument ERROR: Command "ip -4 route replace default scope global table 254 nexthop via 67.110.119.245 dev eth3 weight 1 nexthop via 66.29.181.113