similar to: Fw: Routing Question

Guys Given the replies and interests lately on the WRR scheduler, and the shameless promotion of Route Hat (only kidding), my question is simple. Is there an alternative for the 2.6.x kernels? >From what I gather WRR is only available for the 2.4 kernels... Regards -- Kenneth Kalmer kenneth.kalmer@gmail.com http://opensourcery.blogspot.com

Thanks, annoying but only course of action I guess ... (c; > -----Original Message----- > From: WipeOut [mailto:wipe_out@lycos.co.uk] > Sent: 29 September 2003 10:36 > To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] RE: Asterisk list a SPAMer > (uol.com.br), I think not ... > > > Just add a filter to your mail client to delete all mail from >

Accepted: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2014 12:10:36 +0200 Source: blktap-dkms Binary: blktap-dkms Architecture: source amd64 Version: 2.0.93-0.2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Xen Team <pkg-xen-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org> Changed-By: Evgeni Golov <evgeni at debian.org> Description: blktap-dkms - Xen

All, [version: dovecot-0.99.11-4.EL4.src.rpm] We recently experienced an issue that prevented all new IMAP logins from occurring. Although it appears that it was due to running out of available system file descriptors, I'm still not sure what the true root cause was as I can't replicate the same error in our test environment. The system file descriptor max was set at (per `cat

HI I use dovecot-1.0.r17 on FreeBSD scat.setcom 6.2-RELEASE. Recently authentification stop working. May 10 02:56:02 scat dovecot: auth(default): passwd(test,127.0.0.1): unknown user May 10 02:56:02 scat dovecot: auth(default): client out: OK 1 user=test User= &:/home/test:/tmp/email/bin/nonexistance= May 10 02:56:02 scat dovecot: auth(default): master in: REQUEST 23 43856 1

I''ve been meaning to test this setup somewhere for a while, but never got the right app/(real) traffic/hardware to do it with. So maybe somebody can try it out and let us know if this works... It''s for applications running the same code/data on a cluster of machines, so this doesn''t apply to the majority of low-traffic sites out there. The goal is to avoid having to

I have an adit 600 with one fxo card connected to a Digium single span T1 card. CallerID, disconnect supervision work perfect, however the users complain that they have some sound quality issues, after testing it I realized that whenever one is in a phone call they get like silence between the sounds coming from the other party, almost like a cell phone, in other words if there is no sound coming

Hi. I am trying to configure Samba in Domain security mode. I am on a Sun box running Solaris 9 and Samba 3.0.23. A computer account for this Unix Box is configured in the AD Domain (FAFIDDOM) but I am having issues running net rpc join. I am not planning to use winbind as the samba shares that I want to create are going to be used by ClearCase (Rational Configuration Management Tool). ClearCase

Hi ! I am connecting to Adit 600 thru a T100P card I have configured 1-16 FXS channels and 17-24 FXO. Everything looks fine on Asterisk side I get a tone on all FXS channels, but when I try to dialout thru one of the FXO channels 17-24 it doesn't connect to the POTS line and echoes back my voice. I use fxsls and fxols for the T1 channels and ls on Adit side. Whats wrong here ? here is my Adit

Hello all, I have a new Carrier Access Adit 600 and am having a problem dialing out and receiving incoming calls. After the initial ring, the calling party will here nothing. There is a silence, but the SIP phones that is supposed to ring will ring. The calling party will not hear the sound of the ring that * sends out on the line. Additionally, if someone picks up the receiver there is no

Hi Mr.Andrew Tridgell I did install Samba Server (Version 2.2.3a). All work perfectly. My users can work with share directories from WinNT and Win98. But ... I did all tests that you recommend, but test number 3 and test number 7 didn't work. I received message: # /usr/local/samba/bin/smbclient -L Israel-is Ld.so.1: /usr/local/samba/bin/smbclient: fatal: libreadline.so.4: open filed: No

This is intended to be a bug report with proposed patch. I am posting to this mailing list as described in NOTE in "Bug Reporting in R". Function `stats:::regularize.values()` is meant to preprocess `x` and `y` arguments to have "proper" values for later use during interpolation. If input is already "proper", I would expect it to reuse the same objects without

This is intended to be a bug report with proposed patch. I am posting to this mailing list as described in NOTE in "Bug Reporting in R". Function `stats:::regularize.values()` is meant to preprocess `x` and `y` arguments to have "proper" values for later use during interpolation. If input is already "proper", I would expect it to reuse the same objects without

Hey folks, I stumbled across the Mastershaper project ( http://www.mastershaper.org/ ) but I have a little problem: I wanted to shape the traffic coming from the router itself aswell as coming from the LAN behind the router, for that task I need IMQ, but with IMQ iptables-(layer7)-matching is not possible. Now I''ve talked with the programmer and he said the following: >The problem is

## QUESTION I am sharing a 120GB folder with lots of files via Samba on a LAN (1Gbps connection). 1) Doing an `ls -lR` on the server (on this folder) takes ~32 seconds, compared with **72 minutes** on the client. Is this difference in performance expected (due to network and protocol overhead)? 2) While the client is executing an `ls -lR`, one smbd process on the server uses about 30-40% of a

Hi, yesterday I updated my second server from Debian Squeeze to Debian Wheezy. Since todaay I get the followinig errors in my logs: Error-Log: ... Jun 26 09:08:28 mailstore dovecot: imap(user at domain.net pid:28898 session:<iuMX3Lf8fACXLrFC>): Fatal: master: service(imap): child 28898 killed with signal 11 (core dumped) ... Mail-log ... Jun 26 09:08:28 mailstore dovecot: imap-login: ID

Hi all I am using a pass trhu router and I need to QoS some clients output by its IP address. The problem is that QoS is due after NATing. Is there some clever way of doing this besides MARKing every packet with some IP hashing in POSTROUTING NAT table? Regards Ethy

I have Centos 5.7 AMD64; is there a way to have Squid 3 with SSLBump feature in Centos 5.7? I appreciate any help on that?

Hi Graham, I created a bug report with a reproducer for the failures I’ve got: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35288 I have also found that LTO reverts everything the partial inliner has done. Maybe the partial inliner should not be used at the first LTO phase (compilation). I hope I’ll have a chance to look at the code size regressions this week. Thanks, Evgeny Astigeevich From:

Hi folks...!!! I´ve a problem that i did not solve it. i want to limit the DOWNLOAD to my hosts (upstream traffic for the firewall) using IMQ, If i classify by PORT (source or destination) all seems to be fine, but...BUT...if i want to restrict by IP addresss (internal IP address) i can´t do it, because my hosts go to Internet toward the firewall using NAT, so after NAT my IP address in