similar to: Unnumbered GRE tunnel

Hi Guys, Running the following with a Sangoma A101D PRI card: *Asterisk 1.4.21.2* *LibPRI version: 1.4.10* No inbound or outbound calls can be made. In fact Asterisk CLI doesn't show any activity. Problem goes away on restart of the system or maybe asterisk. I see post about upgrading Libpri to 1.4.10.2 and then I see posts that even that didn't work. Anyone can weigh in this please?

Entering a comment in WordPress, one of my users stumbled upon an interesting problem with PHP Markdown: 1. You write a numbered paragraph. You write a second, unnumbered paragraph to elaborate. 1. You another numbered paragraph, and the numbering resets to 1, even if you number the paragraph 2. I understand what's going on here, with PHP Markdown interpreting each of the two numbers as

Hi: When should we use "unnumbered priorities"(n) in extensions.What is the different between these 2 forms of extensions.conf? and ,Are both true? extensions.conf: form1: [Conferencerooms] exten => 333,1,Answer exten => 333,n,meetme(8000|cim) exten => 333,n,playback(vm-goodbye) exten => 333,n,hangup form2: [Conferencerooms] exten => 333,1,Answer exten =>

Hi Guys, Anyone might know why this error keeps showing up and inbound/outbound is not working on a Bell PRI with Sangoma A101D? -- Got SABME from network peer. Sending Unnumbered Acknowledgement No calls can be made inbound/outbound. Keeps repeating. No alarms ON and no changes been made to the system. Stopped all a sudden. Asterisk CLI doesn't show anything with full verbose for both

Hi all, I have succesfully joined together three LANs using OpenVPN over Linux (Debian) gateways at the 'exit' of each one of these LANs. The VPN seems to be OK, as I can ping network hosts from one LAN to another using their private IP addresses with no problem at all. However network browsing through the VPN is not working. The network diagram for my setup is at

I have a setup with two Internet providers. One circuit (net0 == eth1) is used primarily for employees and tunnels to other sites. The other (net1 == eth2) is for the production machines that customers access. Everythung works in teh sense that packets get to where they are sent (mostly) but I recently I had a sniffer on the system and noticed a problem I cannot solve. traffic coming in

Hi, I'm trying a VPN via ssh between Linux (Suse 10.3, 5.0) and OpenBSD (4.2, 4.7). But it doesn't work... On Linux: sudo ssh -v -f -w 0:1 $OPENBSD true sudo /sbin/ifconfig tun0 10.1.1.1 10.1.1.2 sudo /sbin/route add -net 192.168.17.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 dev tun0 On OBSD: sudo ifconfig tun1 10.1.1.2 10.1.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 sudo /sbin/route add 10.0.3.0/24 10.1.1.1 And add a

If an ssh server receives a tun/tap tunnel request and sets up the tunnel concerned, as far as I can see there is currently no way for the server to configure the tunnel in a manner dependent upon (e.g) the key used to set up the ssh session. Whilst an id based on the key can be passed to the ssh child process, where the tunnel is dynamically allocated, its tunnel name is lost. This patch

Hi all, I have finally got tinc working, but it?s only between server/client. Client can receive broadcast packets from server ethernet, and pings between them is fine. If I ping tinc client(192.168.88.166) from any machine in my server lan, 192.168.88.0/24, all packets timed out, and nothing received by the client. Any ideas? Thanks! Regards, Quan Zhou +------------------------+ |pub

Hello all, Yesterday I noticed that my system was "leaking" traffic towards the 10/8 network, I have shorewall installed on multiple machines ranging from single interface devices to ones with 10+ interfaces. I tested all the boxes and they are showing the same behavior. All systems are CentOS 3.4, 2.4.21-27.0.2.ELsmp. Shorewall version: 2.2.1 For the host mentioned is a single

Hi folks, I have three network cards on my Slackware box and eth0 and eth1 are for two Internet connections. They have imq0 and imq1. All traffic shaping works fine. Internal eth2 does no traffic shaping. But recently I have put two OpenVPN tunnels (tun devices) and both work via eth0. So my question is - how to shape the traffic on these tun0 and tun1 devices? Thanks Remus

Dear list, I am having a problem with openvpn. I have the following arrangement, running two instances of openvpn on "home fw". I want to protect my WLAN in back of the home fw and that works fine. I can see "Peer connection initiated with 192.168.1.3:5000" in daemon.log on homefw. Nothing gets initiated with officefw, nor can I ping the other end of the tunnel at officefw.

Friends-- I'm stumped! Cannot get mount.cifs to work over a tun connection. How would you trouble-shoot this? 1. It cannot be openvpn causing the problem: I can ping across the connection both directions on all machines. 2. It cannot be samba causing the problem: I can mount.cifs the smb shares on the lan (using the identical credentials file) without any issue. 3. Have iptables

We''ve just upgraded to a new firewall machine, and a new version of Shorewall. We''re now on 2.04; previous version was 1.3.9b (!). So I''m pretty sure whatever problems we''re having are related to the big version jump. We''re using config files that exactly match our old (working) configuration (IOW, these are things which _were_ working on the old

[192.168.0.0/24 Lan] v [Shorewall box ''Curtain'', 192.168.0.254, DHCP to ISP, and a OpenVPN tunnel 10.4.0.2] v [Internet] v [Shorewall box ''statler'' 130.241.25.165, and an OpenVPN tunnel 10.4.0.1] Now, i have set a rule on statler ACCEPT vpn $FW tcp smtp and i have as below. root@statler:/etc/shorewall# cat zones | grep -v ^# net Net Internet

On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 02:21:08AM -0500, md at rpzdesign.com wrote: > Oops, I got it to work only after putting the WAN on port 656 so it > did not interfere with port 655 for the LAN. You should not need to have two tinc daemons just because you have a WAN and a LAN interface. By default (ie, if you don't specify BindToAddress and/or BindToInterface), tinc listens on all interfaces,

Hi all. I'm trying to bring an Amazon VM into the LAN by following this guide [0]. However, it appears that OpenSSH on either RHEL7 or CentOS7 is broken as it is not creating tap interface but tun interface. I've tried this on both CentOS5 and CentOS6 and they both work as advertised! Downgrading the OS is not an option! CentOS5/6 gives me: ****************** tap1:

Dear sir, I have to set up a mail gateway which will be explored to Internet and a secure mail server in the Intranet. I need a smart imap proxy in the mail gateway which will fetch the mail from server and present to user through either a stand alone mail client or a web mail client. All authentication is through ldap server. I have installed Dovecot 2.2 Unstable in my Ubuntu 12.04 with ssl

Hi everybody, I want to do the following setup : | | Tun1 - Link 1 | Tun1 | | Router A | teql | INTERNET Link - | | teql |router B | | Tun2 - Link 2 | Tun2 | | This should permit to agregate Link 1 and Link 2 (less the cost of the encapsulation). The two tunnels are GRE ip tunnel. It seems to work fine

On 11/06/19 11:49, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 11/06/2019 11:38, Sebastian Arcus via samba wrote: >> >> On 11/06/19 11:07, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >>> On 11/06/2019 10:34, Sebastian Arcus via samba wrote: >>>> I've just upgraded a Samba AD server to 4.10.2 a few weeks ago from >>>> 4.x (I'm afraid I'm not sure the exact