similar to: HTB tree is too deep

I''ve got a linux router pushing 600-1000 pppoe connections through it. I''m getting a screen error "Neighbor Table Overflow" after this box has been up for between 1 week and 1 month. When this is happening, routing slows to a crawl if at all. Then dies. I''ve added: # Added to stop "neighbor table overflow" messages in the kernel

What is the maximum value for "prio"? It seems that for htb its maximum is 7. Is that right? R. -- ___________________________________________________________________ It''s so simple to be wise. Just think of something stupid to say and say the opposite. +------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Richard Lucassen, Utrecht

Hi everybody, I''ve got a little problem when adding HTB support to my SUSE 8.1 by patching its kernel 2.4.19. After i patch kernel getting some errors, the HTB kernel option shows up but when i make modules it finds something wrong with the sch_htb.o module. Could somebody give me a hand on this? Thanks in advance. I get this information when patching (patch -p1 <

The HTB qdisc has a compile time option, HTB_HYSTERESIS, that trades accuracy of traffic classification for CPU time. These patches change hysteresis to be a runtime option under the control of "tc". The effects of HYSTERESIS on HTB''s accuracy are significant (see chapter 7, section 7.3.1, pp 69-70 in Jesper Brouer''s thesis: http://www.adsl-optimizer.dk/thesis/ ),

The HTB qdisc has a compile time option, HTB_HYSTERESIS, that trades accuracy of traffic classification for CPU time. These patches change hysteresis to be a runtime option under the control of "tc". The effects of HYSTERESIS on HTB''s accuracy are significant (see chapter 7, section 7.3.1, pp 69-70 in Jesper Brouer''s thesis: http://www.adsl-optimizer.dk/thesis/ ),

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, I''m using HTB to shape my outgoing traffic over a ADSL-link with PPPoE with a nominal bandwidth of 128kbit/s. My goal is to favour small packets like ACKs and interactive services like ssh; in other words, I want to achieve low lantency. If there are some big packets going over the wire, everything works fine. But if there are

The HTB scheduler code is a mess, this patch set does some basic house cleaning. The first four should cause no code change, but the last two need more testing. -- Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org> "And in the Packet there writ down that doome" - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to

Hi. I wrote in a reply to a mail on here recently that you can''t set mpu (minimum packet unit) on HTB as you can on CBQ. I''ve just noticed that there is a patch on devik''s site which does mpu and overhead. http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/qos/htb/ For dsl users mpu is, for practical purposes going to be 106 - overhead is still variable though, depending on packet size.

Hello good day to all ... this is my setup 1 Linux Wireless Access Point, connected are 4 wireless gateway in which i needed to apply shaping ... ok here is the weird part... clients on each gateway download files from the Acess Point ... a 500 mb file through ftp on gateway 1 which is up to 64 kbps ... the result is from 60-64 kbps speed which is fine ... on gateway 2 which is 128 kbps ... the

OK, here it is. Near perfect bandwidth calculation for ADSL users. Patch iproute2 with the HTB stuff and then this: It''s still a hack (as far as I can tell) because we are patching the rates tables, and hence I think it is only loosly coupled with the actual calculation of bytes in each bucket. However, it works very nicely for me! I have only been lightly testing with

>>eth1 & eth2 are both connected to the EN5861 router. I''ve done that >>because I couldn''t work out any other way to use the static IP address >>that out ISP have given us. >> > >Aha, this is a config question. You can just add as many ip addresses to each physical card as you like. I forget the exact syntax, but check man pages for

Hello, i have a htb setup where the root and (nearly) all child classes has a ceil rate with max up from my adsl line. But the root class don''t reach the ceil value but some childs are get a huge backlog. My setup: (tc -d class show dev ppp0) [cleaned a bit] ******************************************************** class htb 1:1 root rate 576000bit ceil 576000bit burst 30Kb/8 cburst

Hi, New to traffic shaping I would like to make some tests. It''s for a production server (fw), using 2.4.27 kernel. Something is not clear to me about HTB... is the last stable version included in the 2.4.27 kernel and iproute2 (iproute2-2.6.8-040823.tar.bz2) ? Are there special patches to apply ? EC. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list /

>> No I am using the EN5861, just that we have two ADSL lines and only >> one >> EN5861 and rather than buying another I''d like to use linux to do the >> same job as the en5861, if you know what I mean. > >You can, but since you have two ADSL lines, you''ll need two ADSL devices of some kind, whether it''s a pair of 5861s, or a 5861 and an

Hey, fellow LART controlllers, I''d like to ask if someome has a real esfq experience with HTB class hierarchy and esfq qdiscs. Lets say that I want to unite the connections to 10 client PCs with u32 or fw filters (doesn''t matter which one in fact) into one HTB class with esfq qdisc at the end. Did anyone tried it, and more important, did it worked the way it is supposed to? As

HTB and imq was used to control traffic. AC="tc class add dev eth0 parent" $AC 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 100kbps burst 2k $AC 1:2 classid 1:10 htb rate 50kbps ceil 100kbps burst 2k prio 1 $AC 1:2 classid 1:11 htb rate 50kbps ceil 100kbps burst 2k prio 1 please tell me the range of "prio" _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? 新鲜到底,娱乐到家 -

Hi all, I patch my kernel (2.6.17) and my tc (iproute2-2.6.18-061002) utilitie for an accurate packet scheduling on an ATM link. I configure my HTB hierarchy on the upload of the link and try with differents flows. It works correctly but in some of case I lose about 50% of my bandwith. I use the overhead (42) configuration for my link (PPPoE, VC/LLC) indicate in the documentation. My question

Hi everyone, I have just updated samba from 4.11.6 to 4.12.0, compiled by the sources. Everything was fine and AD server is ok , but when I call samba-tool this error always appear: ldb: unable to dlopen /usr/lib64/samba/ldb/local_password.so : /usr/lib64/samba/libsamdb-common-samba4.so: version `SAMBA_4.11.6' not found (required by /usr/lib64/samba/ldb/local_password.so) ldb: unable to

Hi! I?m installing samba 3.6.19 at debian wheezy server with PDC option, all the desktops over the lan, are Windows 7, I read over the internet the problem that DNS is incorrect and the desktop cannot join to domain, I?m facing this problem right now. I have applied the registry entries to the desktop as says in https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Registry_changes_for_NT4-style_domains but the

I finally managed to compile ogg123 under MacOS X, after creating a PB project for it. Rillian, do you want to include the PB project in cvs? (it needs a LOT of polishing, though). ---------- Ogg123 from PACKAGE VERSION by Kenneth Arnold <kcarnold@arnoldnet.net> and others Usage: ogg123 [<options>] <input file> ... -h, --help this help -V, --version display