similar to: Fwd: PFIFO to contain more pkts than allowed by TCP peer?

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 9000 matches similar to: "Fwd: PFIFO to contain more pkts than allowed by TCP peer?"

2001 Jun 26
1
prio fighting
Hi, I have done this setup to give the machine 192.168.1.4 (masqueraded over dialup) the highest priority: #! /bin/bash WHAT="add" iptables -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -s 192.168.1.1 -t mangle -j MARK --set-mark 1 iptables -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -s 192.168.1.4 -t mangle -j MARK --set-mark 4 tc qdisc $WHAT dev ppp0 root handle 1: prio bands 3 priomap 0 1 2 tc qdisc $WHAT dev ppp0 parent 1:1
2002 Dec 04
3
HTB/IMQ troubles (probably)
Hello, I use HTB with linux-2.4.20-ac1 and iptables-1.2.7a (pathced for IMQ). I configured one HTB qdisc on an IMQ device. This qdisc has some classes (about 5) and all of the classes has qdisc pfifo. I sometimes got out from my linux (while I was working) and I found in logs: Dec 4 11:49:27 core kernel: HTB init, kernel part version 3.7 Dec 4 11:49:28 core kernel: HTB: quantum of class
2006 Sep 10
1
HTB and tc filter
Help me  ... I try use the tc filter, but seems he doesn''t work, I already reconfigured my kernel ( 2.4.32 ) with all options related a QOS enabled ( like modules ) and nothing happens. I get the tc tool from HTB source package, well  this is my set : eth0 is my internal NIC. tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 12 tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate
2006 Sep 10
1
help with HTB and tc
Help me  ... I try use the tc filter, but seems he doesn''t work, I already reconfigured my kernel ( 2.4.32 ) with all options related a QOS enabled ( like modules ) and nothing happens. I get the tc tool from HTB source package, well  this is my set : eth0 is my internal NIC. tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 12 tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate
2007 May 26
1
Problem with the tc statistcis
I had a linux wireless router. I would like to monitor the queue lengh of the wireless interface. By default, the wifi0 interface is with pfifo_fast qdisc which does not report backlog packet. I replaced pfifo_fast with pfifo: ''tc qdisc replace dev wifi0 root pfifo'' Then I use iperf to send UDP pkts faster than the interface can handle but when I read the qdisc, the result is
2002 Dec 09
3
HTB problems
Hello, I have HTB on IMQ device. My rate does not work as I configured. I configured 1920kbit/s and I can download only about 290kbit/s (while it should be the whole bandwidth). My script: /sbin/modprobe imq numdevs=1 /usr/local/sbin/tc qdisc del dev imq0 root 2> /dev/null > /dev/null /usr/local/sbin/tc qdisc del dev imq0 ingress 2> /dev/null > /dev/null /sbin/ifconfig imq0 down
2001 Dec 28
1
need help in shaping traffic
hi all, my system with kernel 2.4.16 & 2.4.17( RH-7.2) has netfilter-1.2.4, iproute-ss010803, squid, dns with 4 ether cards.i am trying a simple situation where i want to shape traffic all the interfaces. at present iam using netfilter to allow a few ips, using transparent squid & iproute to limit bandwidth. i feel i must give more bandwidth for my local servers for my office &
2003 Jun 12
11
htb problem
Hi, I have some interesting problem with htb , I set up root class and sub-classess: $TC qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb $TC class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 1990kbit ceil 2000kbit $TC class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate 190kbit ceil 200kbit $TC class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:11 htb rate 1400kbit ceil 1600kbit $TC class add dev eth0 parent 1:1
2005 Jul 08
5
HTB Rate and Prio
Hi, I wanted to implement some QOS on my Linux Box with HTB, but after some time spend on the configuration and tests, I still don''t manage to have some correct results. Here are the details : -ROOT 2000 kbits -HIGHPRIO SUBCLASS 50 kbits prio 0 -SUBCLASS1 750 kbits prio 1 -SERVICE1 250 kbits prio 1
2006 Jun 01
6
For leaf classes is best PFIFO or SFQ?
Hi to all, i''m following this guide (http://www.opalsoft.net/qos/DS-28.htm), is very detailed, but i''m a bit confused about queuing disciplinse of leaf classes. In this guide the author uses PFIFO (see the scheme that i attached at message) in this way: # tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:21 handle 210: pfifo lmit 10 # tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:22 handle 220: pfifo lmit 10 #
2005 Oct 06
1
HTB problem running on VLAN, not working
Hello. I''m running linux box with Slackware 9.1 and compiled kernel 2.4.31 with "yes" to VLANs and "yes" to all QoS. On this box i have more ethernet interfaces: eth0 eth1 eth2 and so as more vlan interfaces: eth0.100 eth1.3 eth1.4 This is entrace(uplink) router to our whole network and my goal is to shape users on this machine. I want for this purpose use HTB so
2003 Jun 21
3
pfifo scheduler
Hello ppl, I''m playing with the pfifo scheduler, its simple, and i cannot understand what''s wrong. So, i have test machine, with one interface eth0, and i want to send no more than 3 packets/sec out of that interface, so i do: tc qdisc add dev eth0 root pfifo limit 3 And i get pfifo scheduler on eth0 with limit of 3, but it sends as many packets per second as it wants, without
2013 Jun 01
3
[Bug 65251] New: nouveau E[ PFIFO][0000:01:00.0] CACHE_ERROR - Ch 6/0 Mthd 0x0060 Data 0x8000000f
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65251 Priority: medium Bug ID: 65251 Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Summary: nouveau E[ PFIFO][0000:01:00.0] CACHE_ERROR - Ch 6/0 Mthd 0x0060 Data 0x8000000f Severity: normal Classification: Unclassified OS: Linux (All) Reporter:
2006 Mar 13
3
hfsc and dropped packets
Hi, I''m trying to get a handle on hfsc. Here is my configuration: root@jmnrouter:/jmn# tc class show dev vlan1 class hfsc 1: root class hfsc 1:1 parent 1: ls m1 0bit d 0us m2 225000bit ul m1 0bit d 0us m2 225000bit class hfsc 1:10 parent 1:1 rt m1 191000bit d 25.0ms m2 135000bit ls m1 0bit d 0us m2 135000bit ul m1 0bit d 0us m2 225000bit class hfsc 1:20 parent 1:1 rt m1 22008bit d
2013 Dec 22
5
[Bug 72978] New: nouveau E[ PFIFO][0000:01:00.0] CACHE_ERROR
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72978 Priority: medium Bug ID: 72978 Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Summary: nouveau E[ PFIFO][0000:01:00.0] CACHE_ERROR QA Contact: xorg-team at lists.x.org Severity: normal Classification: Unclassified OS: All Reporter: mikhail.v.gavrilov at
2007 Apr 14
2
Samba -> WinXP: slow transfers, partial solution
Hello All, I'm running Samba 3.0.24 as PDC and file server on Gentoo Linux, AMD64, 2.6.19 kernel, 100MBit/s network, and experience quite slow file transfers from Samba to WinXP SP2 clients: the speed is varying, but is about 1-2Mb/s at best. I spent quite some time investigating the issue, here are the intermediate results: 1) This happens only when transferring _from_ _Samba_ to
2007 Apr 17
1
SCP v. SFTP
I was comparing some traces from SCP and SFTP when transferring the same file 200MB file between the same host pairs. Even when I put SFTP in batch mode I noticed that I saw 403208 bytes from the receiver in comparison to 3368 bytes with SCP. I've attached the relevant output from tcptrace below (the b->a column is the return side of the trace). Mostly I'm just curious as to what
2003 Jul 05
13
HTB doesn''t respect rate values
Hi, machine: AMD K6 200 MHz Linux distribution: Mandrake 8.1 kernel: compiled 2.4.21 applied this: #define PSCHED_CLOCK_SOURCE PSCHED_CPU in file linux/include/net/pkt_sched.h bevore compiled the kernel (described on http://www.docum.org/stef.coene/qos/faq/cache/40.html) bandwitch on eth0: 128kbit The most simple configuration - 122kbit guaranted for WWW (sport 80) and
2012 Aug 03
25
[Bug 53101] New: Fedora 17 "PFIFO - playlist update failed" on boot
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53101 Bug #: 53101 Summary: Fedora 17 "PFIFO - playlist update failed" on boot Classification: Unclassified Product: xorg Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component:
2006 Apr 05
7
Tocken Bucket with priority?
Hi. I''m trying to get a traffic shaper like this: ------ VoIP pkts --> | |_| ------ \ | ---O -> ------ / Data pkts --> | ------ In this shaper voip packets are in a different queue than any other kind of packet. I want a data packet to be