similar to: ip neigh show and NUD_NOARP state - is it possible ?

--kXdP64Ggrk/fb43R Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello everyone, I''m using Shorewall 1.2.12-1 on Debian 3.0, with the 2.4.17 kernel. I am seeing some interesting log entries, and after reading the documentation at Google and netfilter.org I have a couple questions. To begin, here are the entries I am

Sorry this is the right message. Hi all, in my school I have: - two Netopia router for ADSL (perform NAT), - one linux box with 3 ethernet card I want to make a load balancing on the two ADSL line. I have configured the system as follow: The LAN interface, of the two ADSL router, have address (A) 192.168.0.254 (B) 192.168.2.254 The 3 ethernet card, on the linux box, have address: -eth2

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=896 Summary: You can not add the follow kinds of sets: mark, integer, string, lladdr Product: nftables Version: unspecified Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: nft

Add raw network backend option which uses a packet socket to provide raw networking access. Once the socket is opened it's bound to a provided host interface, such that packets received on the interface are delivered to the VM and packets sent by the VM are sent to the interface. This is functionally similar to the existing pcap network backend, with the same advantages and problems.

Add raw network backend option which uses a packet socket to provide raw networking access. Once the socket is opened it's bound to a provided host interface, such that packets received on the interface are delivered to the VM and packets sent by the VM are sent to the interface. This is functionally similar to the existing pcap network backend, with the same advantages and problems.

This adds support for vhost-net virtio kernel backend. To enable (assuming device eth2): 1. enable promisc mode or program guest mac in device eth2 2. disable tso, gso, lro on the card 3. add vhost=eth0 to -net flag 4. run with CAP_NET_ADMIN priviledge (e.g. root) This patch is RFC, but works without issues for me. It still needs to be split up, tested and benchmarked properly, but posting it

This adds support for vhost-net virtio kernel backend. To enable (assuming device eth2): 1. enable promisc mode or program guest mac in device eth2 2. disable tso, gso, lro on the card 3. add vhost=eth0 to -net flag 4. run with CAP_NET_ADMIN priviledge (e.g. root) This patch is RFC, but works without issues for me. It still needs to be split up, tested and benchmarked properly, but posting it

This adds support for vhost-net virtio kernel backend. To enable (assuming device eth2): 1. enable promisc mode or program guest mac in device eth2 2. disable tso, gso, lro on the card 3. add vhost=eth0 to -net flag 4. run with CAP_NET_ADMIN priviledge (e.g. root) This patch is RFC, but works without issues for me. It still needs to be split up, tested and benchmarked properly, but posting it

This adds support for vhost-net virtio kernel backend. To enable (assuming device eth2): 1. enable promisc mode or program guest mac in device eth2 2. disable tso, gso, lro on the card 3. add vhost=eth0 to -net flag 4. run with CAP_NET_ADMIN priviledge (e.g. root) This patch is RFC, but works without issues for me. It still needs to be split up, tested and benchmarked properly, but posting it

This adds support for vhost-net virtio kernel backend. To enable (assuming device eth2): 1. enable promisc mode or program guest mac in device eth2 2. disable tso, gso, lro, jumbo frames on the card (disabling lro + jumbo frames should be sufficient, haven't tested this) 3. add vhost=eth2 to -net flag 4. run with CAP_NET_ADMIN priviledge (e.g. root) This patch is RFC, but works without

This adds support for vhost-net virtio kernel backend. To enable (assuming device eth2): 1. enable promisc mode or program guest mac in device eth2 2. disable tso, gso, lro, jumbo frames on the card (disabling lro + jumbo frames should be sufficient, haven't tested this) 3. add vhost=eth2 to -net flag 4. run with CAP_NET_ADMIN priviledge (e.g. root) This patch is RFC, but works without

Hello all, I need a virtual firewall/router solution. I''m thinking of a netscreen 1000 but I want to know if it can be done in Linux. Here is my idea: 1 Linux box 2 GigE interfaces 1 interface setup with a public IP address ($PUBIP) 1 interface setup with 802.1q VLAN trunking with 100 vlans assigned ($VLAN1-$VLAN100) a /25 subnet routed to $PUBIP from my core routers All $VLAN

Hi: I am add a ARP entry and then delete it, but it is still in the neighbour table. here is the ip neigh list result: 192.168.0.101 dev default nud failed the entry is labeled as failed. why not deleted? Regards yinzhaohui

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 19/01/16 12:34, J Martin Rushton wrote: > Not new: I can remember seeing DEC engineers cleaning up the > contacts on memory boards for a VAX 11/782 with a pencil eraser > c.1985. It's still a pretty standard first fix to reseat a card or > connector. I used to do that as well. The contacts would come out nice and shiny when you

I want only to ignore the arp request for alias ip ,at the same time I don't want disable the arp function of the interface ? How do ? thanks! --------------------------------- DO YOU YAHOO!? ÑÅ»¢Ãâ·ÑGÓÊÏ䣭ÖйúµÚÒ»¾øÎÞÀ¬»øÓʼþɧÈų¬´óÓÊÏä From vova at fbsd.ru Fri Jul 1 13:12:10 2005 From: vova at fbsd.ru (Vladimir Grebenschikov) Date: Fri Jul 1 13:12:12 2005 Subject: how to ignore

OK please try the following patch [PATCH] neighbour: fix a race in neigh_destroy() There is a race in neighbour code, because neigh_destroy() uses skb_queue_purge(&neigh->arp_queue) without holding neighbour lock, while other parts of the code assume neighbour rwlock is what protects arp_queue Convert all skb_queue_purge() calls to the __skb_queue_purge() variant Use

Hello, Is there a way to route p2p traffic on a separate ISP connection, just as you would choose a separate connection for http traffic? I tried all sorts of setups based on: http://www.braindump.dk/en/wiki/?wikipage=PolicyRouting but with no luck. Please help :) (ipp2p is up and running) _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl

On 04/10/14 21:13, The Cop wrote: > > On 10/4/2014 8:46 PM, Bhasker C V wrote: >> On 04/10/14 15:36, The Cop wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I am trying to assign an IPv6 address to one of my guests. I followed the >>> following guide, unsuccessfully: >>> >

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 10/4/2014 8:46 PM, Bhasker C V wrote: > On 04/10/14 15:36, The Cop wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I am trying to assign an IPv6 address to one of my guests. I followed the >> following guide, unsuccessfully: >> https://www.berrange.com/posts/2011/06/16/providing-ipv6-connectivity-to-virtual-guests-with-libvirt-and-kvm/

hi, i want to use my firewall that i build with firewall-builder, but it doesn''t work with the new Xen 3.0.2 xen-2.6.16 kernel. The script hangs on that line: /sbin/ip -4 neigh flush dev eth0 i really don''t know, what can be the problem. are there any hints? cu denny -- Sicherheit verständlich http://www.sides.de GnuPG Key