Displaying 20 results from an estimated 8000 matches similar to: "MAC filter"
2007 Dec 12
1
Re: LARTC Digest, Vol 34, Issue 12
Hey Marek,
I´know that i must to works whith the INGRESS (instead of EGRESS), i´ve well
formed my kernel. My others TC rules for source IP address (not for MAC
address) does work fine...!!!, the problem is whith the MAC because is a not
"IP PROTOCOL" and for that i must to use the "u32/u16 match" to solve it,
and if i make an analogy from my others INGRESS rules applied to Src
2007 May 31
5
IFB & 802.1q
Hello
What I''m looking for is how to configure the Linux QoS module to do
global rate limitation for two (or more) 802.1q pseudo network devices.
I naturally suppose there is a possibility with IFB. I don''t want to use
IMQ because it''s not integrated to my kernel v2.6.21.1 and I didn''t find
IMQ patches for it nor for the iptables package I use (v1.3.7).
2007 Sep 15
5
htb : server trafficcontrol
Hi everyone,
I have a small problem. I have my debian server setup in my home.
I have setup htb that is working perfectly.
The only problem I have is to control the traffic server <-> internet
I have a daemon (bittorrent) and I would like to limit its download to a
certail amount. How can I do that ?
I have tried layer7 but it seems I''m doing something wrong in the htb
script.
2008 Mar 05
2
Shorewall & IFB
Hello Tom!
After i read and analyze some docs about IFB i decide that for implement
this feature in Shorewall not need more efforts (of course i may be wrong).
If we have 'ifb0' device then we must activate ingress discipline on real
device (f.e. eth2) and redirect 'egress' from it to 'ifb0'.
tc qdisc add dev eth2 ingress
tc filter add dev eth2 parent ffff: protocol ip
2007 Mar 28
4
modprobe ifb
I''m trying to set up a traffic control on ingress attaching a egress qdisc to
the ifb device. The idea is to use a RED algorithm instead of policing
the incoming traffic. After trying with tc-red and not obtaining the
expected results, I decided to try with something easier, and use htb
as bottleneck:
ifconfig ifb0 up
tc qdisc del dev $dev ingress
tc qdisc del dev ifb0 root
tc qdisc add
2007 Mar 28
7
(no subject)
Hi all,
I''m having a hell of a time getting my IFB to work. I know I''ve done
this before, so I''m missing something stupid. Can anybody tell me what
it might be?
Configs as follows:
--------
#!/bin/sh
modprobe ifb numifbs=1000
modprobe act_mirred
modprobe 8021q
brctl addbr br0
brctl setfd br0 0
brctl stp br0 off
brctl addif br0 eth1
brctl addif br0 eth2
ifconfig eth1
2007 Jun 26
2
classification of incoming traffic with tc
Hi all,
Another requirement we have is that traffic entering the DS domain be
classified then subsequently assigned a (different?) DSCP based upon its
classification.
For illustrative purposes only let''s say (for traffic entering the DS domain
on dev eth0):
- WWW traffic would be marked BE
- traffic destined for 10.10.10.10 would be marked AF11
- VoIP traffic from 20.20.20.20 would
2005 Dec 10
10
Marking packets by mac addr using tc filter u32 match?
Hi
Is there a way of marking packets by mac address instead of ip or ports
using a "tc filter u32 match"?
I read somewhere that I could use the offset -8 and -14 to grab the mac
addresses but if I use anything lower than -8, for example -9, I get an
error.
I''m modifying the wondershaper script to cap the download speed by mac
address.
Any sugestions?
2006 Aug 08
4
Info about IFB
Hi, I''m looking for info about IFB devices and how I can use it to
incomming traffic shapping.
Has IFB any web about it?
Do any body known where I can find more info about it?
I found this:
http://linux-net.osdl.org/index.php/IFB
But I can''t stand fine how to use it to allow many ifb''s devices or how
to use it with "tc actions".
Any help?
Thanks
--
2006 Jul 02
3
IFB working
How to use IFB as replacement of IMQ
There is not much documentation about it
Please explain with example
--
Failure seldom stops you. What stops you is the fear of failure.
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
2007 Jan 16
8
egress bandwidth not limited / limited extremely inaccurately
I''m just-so-fresh to the list, so hello everyone.
I''m having a realy hard time with setting up very simple bandwidth
management. What I am trying to do is setup a 10Mbit interface to send
at only 1920kbit to most of the network (to make sure it hardly ever
tops 2mbit). I did succeed with the ingress traffic... With egress
however, I get very odd results at different speeds.
With
2006 Mar 30
5
packet marking: only a ratio, not all
Hi all!
In short:
Anybody wrote a patch for DSMARK to make it capable of marking
only a ratio (a given arg to the tc command) of the packets it gets?
Say, 20%? Or, do I have to hack into the source? Alternatives,
like a filter spitting packets to 2 different DSMARK based on this ratio?
In long:
I''m a hungarian univ student involved in a project (RMD-QoS stuff)
which needs
2007 Sep 19
7
ifb and ppp
Hello!
My goal is to setup an ingress traffic shaping on my PPPOE DSL line with ifb.
My old imq stuff used iptables marks (like ''iptables -t mangle -A
PREROUTING -p tcp --sport 22 -m length --length :500 -j MARK --set-mark 31'')
to classify the traffic and since i am lazy, i tried to to reuse them with
ifb. But no luck: iptables marks the packets well, but tc
2007 Mar 22
8
Shape own router
On 2/19/07, Salatiel Filho <salatiel.filho@gmail.com> wrote:
> Well , thanks to imq all my client machines are now shaped and
> everything is great ...
> But now i have a doubt , is there a way to shape the traffic that goes
> to the route [doing a wget from the router for example ]?
>
>
> I have a PREROUTING IMQ0 and a POSTROUTING IMQ1 , everything is
> working like
2007 Mar 13
4
Re: Standalone Shaping
On a router, there is no need for and IMQ because there is always an
egress path.
For example:
Internet -> eth1 -> iptables -> routing -> ... -> egress qdisc ->
eth0 -> LAN
LAN -> eth0 -> iptables -> routing -> .... -> egress qdisc -> eth1
-> Internet
Local Process / Proxy -> routing -> iptables -> egress qdisc ->
eth1/eth0 ->
2006 Oct 28
1
connmark on ifb interfaces
Hello
I''m trying to switch from IMQ to IFB but I have a problem with traffic marked
by ipp2p module. Looks like when traffic is redirected from ethX to ifbX it
looses information about MARK.
Here''s what I do to get ingress traffic to go to ifb interface:
$TC qdisc add dev eth1.42 ingress
$TC filter add dev eth1.42 parent ffff: protocol ip prio 10 u32 \
match u32 0 0
2006 Aug 21
1
QoS on a bridge+NAT
I have a setup where I have three NIC in a Debian box. I have eth1
conected to internet and eth0 NAT''ed to 192.168.1.1. eth1 and eth2 are
bridged together, given ip 192.168.122.2.
What I want to achieve is to perform traffic shaping on the bridge as
well as prioritizing the traffic from eth0 very low. (This is from
trental flat ...) However it seems that I am unable to perform thhe
2006 Jul 08
3
IFB vs IMQ
Is IFB realy replacement of IMQ
Please Guide
--
Failure seldom stops you. What stops you is the fear of failure.
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
2017 Sep 28
9
[PATCH net-next] vhost_net: do not stall on zerocopy depletion
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemb at google.com>
Vhost-net has a hard limit on the number of zerocopy skbs in flight.
When reached, transmission stalls. Stalls cause latency, as well as
head-of-line blocking of other flows that do not use zerocopy.
Instead of stalling, revert to copy-based transmission.
Tested by sending two udp flows from guest to host, one with payload
of
2017 Sep 28
9
[PATCH net-next] vhost_net: do not stall on zerocopy depletion
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemb at google.com>
Vhost-net has a hard limit on the number of zerocopy skbs in flight.
When reached, transmission stalls. Stalls cause latency, as well as
head-of-line blocking of other flows that do not use zerocopy.
Instead of stalling, revert to copy-based transmission.
Tested by sending two udp flows from guest to host, one with payload
of