similar to: Cannot connect to the internet

Hello, I''ve read the FAQ and searched the mailing list but have been unable to resolve my issue with networking in DomUs. The following things I CAN do: +SSH from within DomU to Dom0 +SSH from within DomU to all other DomUs on the same machine +SSH to other machines from within Dom0 +SSH from within DomU to other machines +SSH from other machines to Dom0 (and use the xm commands to

Hello everybody, Here again with a Xenbr0 bridge problem I''m a Gentoo user, xen-sources-2.6.34 and I always used the bridge from eth0 to xenbr0. Here''s what I get at boot time: * Bringing up interface eth0 * null [...] * Starting Xen control daemon ... And the bridge doesn''t come up. The normal behaviour should be that the Xenbr0 bridge comes up automatically, but

I have a centos 4 i386 machine that works like a router (iptables filter, NAT) with two NIC''s. One NIC is connected to my ISP (100 Mbit FTTH), I get a DHCP assigned public IP that changes "sometimes". Most incoming ports are blocked by my ISP. In order to get a fixed IP and open ports, I have to set up a PPTP tunnel to the ISP. The default gw and the NAT''ing goes to

Having a problem with the 3 interface setup. I can get DMZ hosts, and FW to see internet, but anything on LOC interface is unable to get out. My first post to the list didn''t have the information needed, sorry for that, but thank you for pointing me to more resources. I''ve looked at the problem myself some more, but am still stuck. Shorewall Version: 2.2.1 ip addr show 1:

Question about bridge configuration on the host and virtual machine side. I am not able to correctly configure xen so that the virtual machine can access the network. Any suggestions would really be appreciated. Gary _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

Hi everybody, I have been using Shorewall for quite a while now but I recently stumbled over a new setup that stopped me cold. I don''t know how to proceed: I have an ordinary GNU/Linux box (2.6.11) connected to a nonpublic network with one interface eth0 which gets an IP through DHCP like 172.17.x.y. Traffic is not routed to the Internet in this subnet. In order to connect to the

Hi All, I am facing an issue regarding communicating a value from outside to a Guest OS (linux, solaris and windows) launched on Xen Server. I did went through this thread, but It was not completely clear. http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-users/2006-07/msg00473.html My question is - Is there a way in Xen, through which I can communicate a value from outside to a Guest OS (linux,

I am installed Xen 3.0 on a Fedora Core 4(2.6.12-1.1454_FC4xen0) machine. This machine is currently running one host domain: [root@]# xm list Name Id Mem(MB) CPU VCPU(s) State Time(s) Domain-0 0 128 0 1 r---- 49.1 fc4-vm1 1 63 0 1 -b--- 18.5 Following is the network configuration for Domain-0: eth0 Link

Hi! I have a problem with my new Xen setup. I have installed Debian etch with netinstall and I''m using 2.6.18-6-xen-amd64 kernel in my dom0 and 3.0.3-0-4 version xen hypervisor. I''m using four network cards on my system and using three of them as xen bridges and dom0 is using the fourth one only for it''s own. So basicly both of my virtual servers use a network card

Hi, I am trying to get L2TP roadwarrior VPN working from http://www.shorewall.net/IPSEC-2.6.html#RW-L2TP but i am making a mistake somewhere, appreciate a fresh set of eyes to help. I have the following interfaces: ppp0 - interneteth0 - local networkrem - client openvpnl2tp - ppp for lt2p clients I am getting the following error logged when trying to connect into the server with L2TP from a remote

Greetings, I have two vms, one is a router and the other one is a client, for some reason, the client vm is unable get ip via dhcp from the router vm. here are outputs: vm1.xml: <interface type='bridge'> <mac address='52:54:00:54:78:be'/> <source bridge='virbr0'/> <model type='virtio'/> <address

I installed 64-bit xen 3.1.0 (from xensource.com tarballs) on three new machines today, using a configuration setup that I''ve used successfully many times before. However, I encountered a new problem. These are Dell Poweredge 1950 servers, by the way. >From lspci 04:00.0 Ethernet controller: Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme II BCM5708 Gigabit Ethernet (rev 12) 08:00.0 Ethernet

Hi, I tried this post on the Xen list first with no answer. I have 4 machines and 3 of which (all different) have no network access when booted into Xen. I tried using Fedora Core 8 and it produced the same results. Is it normal for the virbr0 interface to take an arbitrary IP? How does it decide what to use? An ifconfig when booted into Xen shows the following: eth0 Link encap:Ethernet

Hi, When is start one vpn i get the following result: tinc10703003005 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr C2:F7:7B:75:47:1A inet addr:192.168.3.20 Bcast:192.168.3.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 inet6 addr: fe80::c0f7:7bff:fe75:471a/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX

hi, i''ve tried again Debian testing, with xen 3.1 binary. it works fine but i can''t have the networt working: i''ve have an ethernet card with static IP: 172.20.2.160 gateway: 172.20.2.1 uname -r :2.6.18-xen without xen, the network works fine. here''s my output: eth0 Lien encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:0F:FE:6B:57:32 inet adr:172.20.2.160

TEQL and Subnet problem I have a network topology shown below, and I am trying to use TEQL. My problem is: When I ping to P3.teql0 from P2 ("[P2]# ping 16.119.144.66"), the traffic can never go from P2.eth1, and all traffic only goes to P1.eth0. What P2.eth1 (16.119.144.33) did is broadcasting an ARP asking for the MAC address of 16.119.144.66, although I have specified the route to

I have shifted some VM's to a new server running Quantal and have had a world of trouble. The first one was caused by issues with an apparently compiled in path in their apparmor version which forced VM pools to be in /srv or similar rather than where I wanted them. For now this was not a big issue, and thankfully the server where it would be a big time problem (there are individual drives per

Hi, I''ve set up identical (what I think) machines using SLES 10 x86_64, but a new one of those is saying frequently in /var/log/messages: kernel: bond0: received packet with own address as source address A short summary of ifconfig looks like this: bond0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:14:4F:2A:12:9C inet addr:132.199.176.78 Bcast:132.199.255.255 Mask:255.255.0.0 eth0

Hi, I have a linux router with 4 ethernet cards; eth0 through eth3. Basically, all I want to do is route all traffic from eth2 to eth0, and all traffic from eth1 to eth3. I''ve looked through the LARTC how-to, specifically at chapter 4, about multiple providers. However, I am still a bit confused, and not sure how to set up my routing tables, as my scenario differs from the one in the

Hello. I''ve just started with Xen and configuring Dom0. My hardware is Core2Duo based Xeon server and I installed Debian etch for amd64 architecture. The Xen related pachages installed are the following. linux-image-2.6.17-2-xen-amd64 linux-modules-2.6.17-2-xen-amd64 xen-hypervisor-3.0.3-1-amd64 xen-tools xen-utils-3.0.3-1 xen-utils-common My problem is that when xend is