similar to: Re: [netperf-talk] How configure my firewall to execute netperf ? I use shorewall (iptable firewall) on Debian

All is in subject. Example : root@harobed:~ # brctl show bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces root@harobed:~ # ifconfig lo Lien encap:Boucle locale inet adr:127.0.0.1 Masque:255.0.0.0 adr inet6: ::1/128 Scope:H?te UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1 RX packets:16510 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0

Hi all, the throughput measured by netperf differs from time to time. The changeset was xen-unstable.hg C/S 11760. This is observed when I executed a netperf on DomU connecting to a netserver on Dom0 in the same box. The observed throughput was between 185Mbps to 3854Mbps. I have never seen such a difference on ia64. Regards, Hiroya _______________________________________________ Xen-devel

First,sorry my poor english~ Here is this test: Virtualization performance comparison test Test environment Physical machine: Cpu 8-core 8G memory HDD: 147G xen virtual machine: cpu 2 core 4G memory 30G hard drive wmware virtual machine: cpu 2 core 4G memory 30G hard drive Optical disk array (san) Size: 7.7T Speed: 6G/sec Testing and structural I / 0 performance test Test methods Test

Wow, an old message from 2004 and I'm seeing the same problem across my network presently. http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2004-August/091252.html What is interesting is that there were not problems until about 4 weeks ago. At first I thought it might be me and my numerous passwords getting confused, but then my wofes laptop started showing the same symptoms. Both laptops have

Hi, I''m not able to get netperf working for a virtual PCI(vif) domU. However, I''m able to get it working while doing pass-through I/O. I''m not sure what is the problem. However, I am able to ping the destination machine using the vif domU. Is there any port etc. that needs to be unblocked here. Regards, Asim _______________________________________________ Xen-users

First, I apologize if this message has been received multiple times. I''m having problems subscribing to this mailing list: Hi xen-users, I am trying to decide whether I should run a game server inside a Xen domain. My primary reason for wanting to virtualize is because I want to isolate this environment from the rest of my server. I really like the idea of isolating the game server

We have Samba 3.2.4 on two SLES 10 (one is SP1, the other SP2 64bit) machines. Both are member servers in our ADS, which was over the past month given some additional DCs, new IPs for all DCs, and upgraded to Windows 2008 (from win2003). The krb5.conf and nsswitch.conf files on the two machines are identical; the smb.conf files are *nearly* identical in their common section; the filewall rules

On Fri, 29 Jun 2018 23:33:58 -0700 xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com wrote: > From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com> > > This patch improves the guest receive and transmit performance. > On the handle_tx side, we poll the sock receive queue at the > same time. handle_rx do that in the same way. > > We set the poll-us=100us and use the iperf3 to test Where/how do

Hi, I've got my samba 2.2.2 server running and working, but while trying to get winbind working, I'm running into a problem. Specifically on step 9.5.3.4 from the winbind configuration documentation: [root@NetServer samba]# smbpasswd -j BIO2RES -r DOMAIN-CONTROL -U Administrator Password: Error connecting to DOMAIN-CONTROL Unable to join domain BIO2RES. [root@NetServer samba]# echo $?

From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com> This patch improves the guest receive and transmit performance. On the handle_tx side, we poll the sock receive queue at the same time. handle_rx do that in the same way. We set the poll-us=100us and use the iperf3 to test its bandwidth, use the netperf to test throughput and mean latency. When running the tests, the vhost-net kthread of

Hi, While going through DIAGNOSIS.txt on my samba 2.2.2 server, I came across the following test results: Test 5: [root@NetServer samba]# nmblookup -B resaddr8.research.bio2.edu '*' querying * on 209.64.53.8 name_query failed to find name * This appears to be a partial failure? Test 6: Initially, I got: [root@NetServer samba]# nmblookup -d 2 '*' added interface

On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 06:18:32PM +0200, Eugenio Perez Martin wrote: > On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 5:13 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 02:37:50PM +0200, Eugenio Perez Martin wrote: > > > > +/* This function returns a value > 0 if a descriptor was found, or 0 if none were found. > > > > + * A negative

Package: xcp-xapi Version: 1.3.2-6 Severity: normal Tags: upstream Normally (in 'iso-based' XCP) is possible to attach VDI to dom0. That operation usually looks like: xe vbd-create vdi-uuid=... vm-uuid=(dom0 uuid) device=N xe vbd-plug I done those steps in xcp-xapi and got success (no error), but no xvd* device found. Here operations log: # xe vbd-create

Hi All, I want to put a ASTERISK BOX bend a Firewall. So I have given below rules. iptables -A FORWARD -p udp -d 192.168.101.30 -m multiport --dports 3478,4569,5060 -m state --state NEW -j ACCEPT iptables -A FORWARD -p udp -d 192.168.101.30 --dport 10000:20000 -m state --state NEW -j ACCEPT iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p udp -i eth0 -d 1.2.3.4 -m multiport --dports 3478,4569,5060 -j DNAT

On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 05:23:43PM +0200, Eugenio Perez Martin wrote: > On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 6:05 PM Eugenio P??rez <eperezma at redhat.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2020-06-11 at 07:30 -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 06:18:32PM +0200, Eugenio Perez Martin wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 5:13 PM Michael S. Tsirkin

On 10/08/14 10:30, Razya Ladelsky wrote: > From: Razya Ladelsky <razya at il.ibm.com> > Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 09:47:20 +0300 > Subject: [PATCH] vhost: Add polling mode > > When vhost is waiting for buffers from the guest driver (e.g., more packets to > send in vhost-net's transmit queue), it normally goes to sleep and waits for the > guest to "kick" it.

Hey, I was running some benchmarks (netserver/netperf) where the init script just launched the netserver and nothing else and was concerned to see the performance not up to par. This was an HVM guest running with PV drivers. If I compile the kernel without CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACER it is much better - but it was my understanding that the tracing code does not impact the machine unless it is

I tried netperf / netserver with Dom0 / DomU, but I could''nt get a correct NW traffic with xentop. Is there anybody could help me? At Host1''s Dom0, run netperf -H VMIP At Host2''s DomU (with VMIP named TTVM), run netserver At Host1, run xentop this way ->"xentop -n -b -d 1" At Host2, run xentop this way->"xentop -n -b -d 1" In Host2''s

Reference the repeater mode of the dummy-ups driver used in the way described by Steffen there is a characteristic which needs to be defined better. I could not find any notes on what the driver does in terms of shutdown. If as a result of LB you issue a upsdrvctl shutdown from a secondary server acting as a master for the repeated driver (which is pretending to run out of battery early) you

On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 06:11:21PM +0200, Eugenio Perez Martin wrote: > On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 5:55 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 08:07:57PM +0200, Eugenio Perez Martin wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 2:28 PM Eugenio Perez Martin > > > <eperezma at redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > >