similar to: simple captive portal& shorewall

Hello, Forgive the cross-posting, but googling showed results from these two lists. I'm looking to set up a WiFi gateway with two nics, and iptables. The catch is i have to use a captive portal as well to ensure all traffic goes to a single destination. I've read about several packages, but haven't seen any docs that say how to integrate everything. If anyone has this setup

Can anyone recommend a captive portal solution that is compatible Shorewall? I know they are not completely secure but I have use for it. Thanks! Matt Burleigh Senior Systems Engineer 703-236-0800 ext 790 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with

Hi All, Does anyone know of a good captive portal that I can get working with shorewall? I am trying to find one that will authenticate users and if a user does not have an account they can create one and pay for service temporarily. Like a hot spot. I''ve been looking a Wifidog but I''m not sure how to get it working with shorewall and also it just creates free accounts, so I

Hi All, I'm trying to set up a Captive Portal using a Centos6 box. I've been experimenting with WiFiDog but it looks like development has faltered and I'm chasing my tail getting all the bits of PHP together for it to run. Some bits I've got look like Alpha code. What I'm trying to accomplish is a a simple firewall type system for a public WiFi, that redirects users to a

Hi, I have released a new snapshot of GnuPG, I hope this is one of the last ones before 1.0.2 ;-) This is still a BETA VERSION and not intended for general use. ftp://ftp.gnupg.org/pub/gcrypt/devel/gnupg-1.0.1e.tar.gz (1600k) The usual diff file is also available, but this time there is only a detached signature for this diff file, because I noticed to late that the --not-dash-escaped option

. "Saluton", Sorry by my poor english, I speak Portuguese. I does a captive portal using: - shorewall - dhcpd - thttpd (in port 8080) - maradns With Shorewall I use dinamic zones. The initial zone in shorewall is configured to redirects access to internal thttpd port 8080, that shows a login.cgi page. With thttpd I rewrite original url. The apache rewrite is very cool, but thttpd

Dear Friends Greetings, i have a question for you, i am sure someone can help. The pfsense captive portal is up and running. Time countdown vouchers are working without issue, such as 30m, 45m, 1h & so on. However, I'd like to set up a download quota of 200MB per voucher. but then you need to login with a username and password, instead of vouchers. but I haven't found a way to

hi! i've got a problem with samba 2.2.6 to access files. samba is running on a hpux 11.11. the server is not integrated in a domain. when i try to access files directly via explorer etc. no problem at all. when i try to access files via a nutcracker-shell from a pc that is in a domain (but the samba-share connected as user which exists on hpux) i get the following error in the log:

Hi I'm experiencing trouble with a Samba 3.0.7 installation and Windows 2000 Professional clients that lose their network drives after some time. The Samba server is acting as a Domain Controller for a single subnet with about 10 clients (W2k Pro with Service Pack 2-4). At some (random) time after the login the clients all have the same problem: the network drive mappings die (sometimes a

Hi! Jim is right. There is a bug in all GnuPG versions up to 1.0.3: If you have more than one cleartext signature in a file (or pipe that to gpg), gpg does not compare each signature but flags each document as good or bad depending on the first document in the file. This is a very serious bug in gpg's verification function. I have made a snapshot version which corrects this bug available

We have a client that has a single Wildcard TDM400P with 3 FXO ports on Asterisk 1.0.7. Occasionally the system seems to loose its mind and starts originating calls from that Zap channels that don't exist. The receptionist picks up the phone and nobody is there. This can happen repeatedly over and over again within a few minutes. As far as we can tell these are definitely not real calls as

I've played around with the lightly documented Asterisk voicemail feature whereby a caller can press "*" during the playback of the OGM and be returned to the "a" extension in the context of the voicemail box. No matter what, Asterisk does nothing when you press "*". It does not interrupt the OGM and it certainly does not return to the "a" context.

On June 26, 2015 7:10:29 PM Andrew Beverley <andy at andybev.com> wrote: > > in the "plugin" section: > > sieve=/home/vmail/sieve/%d/%u/.dovecot.sieve > > sieve_dir=/home/vmail/sieve/%d/%u/sieve change last sieve to .sieve so it does not colledge with other dirs atleast to remember if maildir does not start with a dot, i do this to prevent sive scripts

On Tue, 2005-05-31 at 13:38 -0400, Jared Mauch wrote: > On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 12:30:07PM -0500, John Lange wrote: > > I am not a Cisco person; so the question is, is it possible to have one > > of the following: > > > > 1) Have the Cisco authenticate (register) as a SIP client to the > > Asterisk server. This allows me to place the Cisco in its own context. >

My apologies for the cross-posting. If you are a business or individual providing Voice over IP services in Canada then we encourage you to read this email carefully otherwise please disregard. ----- As you are most likely aware, the CRTC has undertaken the roll of regulating VoIP services in Canada and is currently conducting hearings with the goal of putting in place regulatory requirements

We are using a Cisco router with a T1 card plugged into a PRI provided by a local telco (Allstream). This Cisco accepts calls and sends them to a couple of servers running Asterisk depending on which number was dialled. But there is a problem. When a call comes in to the Cisco from the PSTN it sends it to the Asterisk server something like this: FROM: 204XXXXXXX@<CISCO IP> TO:

Hi, I have recently installed shorewall with a very simple rules configuration, ---------------------------------- #SECTION RELATED SECTION NEW Ping/ACCEPT all $FW Trcrt/ACCEPT all $FW SSH/ACCEPT all $FW ACCEPT net $FW tcp http #LAST LINE -- ADD YOUR ENTRIES BEFORE THIS ONE -- DO NOT REMOVE ----------------------------------------- and I have no

On 16/12/15 20:40, Таболин Юрий wrote: > 16.12.2015 22:47, Rowland penny пишет: >> On 16/12/15 19:35, Rowland penny wrote: >>> On 16/12/15 19:02, Таболин Юрий wrote: >>>> Hi all. >>>> >>>> I have samba 4.2.3 on freebsd 10.1 server. There are three DC and >>>> about 350 PC on domain. I wrote earlier that samba4 ldap

On 16/12/15 19:35, Rowland penny wrote: > On 16/12/15 19:02, Таболин Юрий wrote: >> Hi all. >> >> I have samba 4.2.3 on freebsd 10.1 server. There are three DC and >> about 350 PC on domain. I wrote earlier that samba4 ldap performance >> is not enough for me. Now I want to try a server in the middle with >> openldap pcache - ldap cache proxy function. But

On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Таболин Юрий <tabolin at speechpro.com> wrote: > 16.12.2015 22:47, Rowland penny пишет: > >> On 16/12/15 19:35, Rowland penny wrote: >> >>> On 16/12/15 19:02, Таболин Юрий wrote: >>> >>>> Hi all. >>>> >>>> I have samba 4.2.3 on freebsd 10.1 server. There are three DC and about