similar to: Shorewall time element rules never works ?

Hi all, I upgraded ocfs from 1.2 to 1.4 after the update I launched tunefs.ocfs2 to enable the new ocfs2 features (sparse files and unwritten extents). tunefs.ocfs2 is now running since 2 days (12T partition) and I need my system back to production, can I safety abort tunefs.ocfs2? thanks Nicola

This is a rollup of two fixes: a) A fix for obscure [re]start errors involving the /etc/shorewall/masq file. b) A change which allow ''maclist'' with Atheros WiFi cards. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net

Hi Tom, After two weeks of nightmares I decided ask You (and anyone reading this mail). Context is as follows: I try to update system on my central router from kernel 2.6.29.6 and Shorewall 4.2.6 (old) to kernel 2.6.31.6 and Shorewall 4.4.4.2 (new). This is LiveCD image boot (Devil-Linux distribution compiled by me), so config is this same. I have established ten OpenVPN tunnels and two

I want to use lastest version of Shorewall in my fresh debian squeeze instalation, so I follow http://www.shorewall.net/Install.htm#Debian but, modify preferences file was not enough for me, I have to modify/add some other files in /etc/apt/ directory: 1.) include testing repo to source.list 2.) add APT::Default-Release "stable"; to apt.conf and pinning all other packages to stable

Hi all, Im new to shorewell, can anyone guide me whether I can use shorewell for my work. I have a requirement in our work: Each system shall have two Ethernet card interfaces(system means hardware devices, servers, clients in other words any device or host used in the project). The IP address of each interface will be of different networks, subnets and gateways completely. Bcoz if one of

Hello, I have 2 ISP uplinks (zones: inet1 and inet2), each with a fixed IP on the outside and a routed subnet (/25 and /26) on the inside. So, behind the firewall i have 2 networksegments (lan1 and lan2) with public IP-addresses. The segments are completely isolated from eachother: hosts in zone "lan1" connect only to "inet1" and hosts in zone "lan2" only connect

16.10.2023 15:50, Ingo Asche via samba wrote: > Hi Michael, > > short question: will the Bullseye-Backports getting 4.17.12, too? > > I saw, Bookworm is already updated... Since oldstable-bpo archive in debian is always subject to manual backports-policy processing (all uploads are processed manually), I don't push stuff to oldstable-bpo often. On the other hand, this

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 An Ubuntu 10.04 server running Shorewall 4.4.6.1 hosts three KVM virtual servers on the default libvrt virbr0 bridge at the default vnet+ bridge ports. The bridge and ports are on a separate private subnet (192.168.122.0/24). Each bridge port and the bridge itself are in the dmz, there are two physical interfaces and private local subnets in loc, and

Hi All, I''m using shorewall 4.0.15-1 on debian 5.0.5 and It works fine. I want to start using rules based on users. This is supported in the shorewall-rules file, However it seems that each rule can only be associated with one user or group. Does this mean that I cannot have a rule apply to several users which belong to several groups? Will creating duplicate rules for each user

hello before asking my question I come My name is Santiago and I''m from Spain but I''m in Colombia I followed this guide: https://www.doas.montanalinux.org/proxmox-ve-with-shorewall.html but when I run shorewall check, this error occurs: Checking... Initializing... Determining Zones... IPv4 Zones: net loc Firewall Zone: fw Validating interfaces file... ERROR: Invalid

Hello, My name is Felipe I succesfuly installed Shorewall 4.4.20.3 in Ubuntu 10.04, This installation is for controlling the access into the local Network, My question is if it is possible to make a conecction WAN to LAN using Terminal Name?? i have been searching in goolge but i didnt find an answer!!!! For example we have IP Public into shorewall with 2 interfaces, and in the LAN we have 3

Hello, This is using version 4.4.11.3 (Debian). The following error occurs: ERROR: Duplicate Host Group (eth1:10.128.23.34/16) in zone loc : The configuration is a test config. Commented lines removed to keep it clear: # cat zones fw firewall loc ipv4 # cat interfaces loc eth1 - # cat hosts loc eth1:10.128.23.34/16 # cat policy all all ACCEPT

I am attempting to use the Knock.pm from http://www.shorewall.net/ManualChains.html I am not having much luck making the DNAT- knock work for some reason. Anyone else using this on 4.4.4 that can verify if this still works as documented? Thanks ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Return on Information: Google Enterprise Search pays you back Get the

There are massive attacks on specific port, I want to trap and log just the ip source to this port. Is there anyway to do so with shorewall? Thanks. Willy Mularto sangprabv@gmail.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev

Hi List, I have a new install of CentOS 6.2 and shorewall 4.5.1-2. I usually have no issues with shorewall until now. When I execute < #shorewall start > I get the following error. root@poweredge > /etc/shorewall# shorewall start Compiling... Can''t locate Shorewall/Compiler.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /usr/share/shorewall /usr/local/lib/perl5 /usr/local/share/perl5

Hi, I am building a firewall that will have two groups of subnets behind it which I''ll provision via vlans. The upstream provider will be supplying a router with a single interface with two subnets routed into it, one is a private connection to the corporate WAN and the other is a public (Internet) block. One group of subnets behind the firewall will be SNAT''d out through a

Hi, i am using squid as a transparent proxy. i have added this 3 lines to my rules file ACCEPT $FW net tcp www ACCEPT loc $FW tcp 8080 REDIRECT loc 8080 tcp www - !192.168.100.2 i want to limit the number of connection that are made from every pc on the network to the proxy server. if i change the 2nd rule to ACCEPT loc $FW tcp 8080

I''m playing around with VLAN''s and I have a VLAN capable (layer 2) smart switch. I see a steady stream of martians in the logfile if I have the routefilter option set on the loc zone interfaces in /etc/shorewall/interfaces. I have two interfaces in the loc zone, eth1 and vlan2 respectively. vlan2 is an 802.1q trunk going towards the switch. Is this the expected behavior in

Hi. I''m migrating to shorewall(6) mgmt of my various firewalls. Simple configs have been easy with the great docs. I''ve got a slightly more convoluted config, and have gotten ''lost'' in config''ing a SNAT/DNAT/NAT + DMZ + Xen Host/Guest set up with Static IP/29. Having some challenges wrapping my head around the ''best'' Shorewall

Hi, I have recently installed shorewall with a very simple rules configuration, ---------------------------------- #SECTION RELATED SECTION NEW Ping/ACCEPT all $FW Trcrt/ACCEPT all $FW SSH/ACCEPT all $FW ACCEPT net $FW tcp http #LAST LINE -- ADD YOUR ENTRIES BEFORE THIS ONE -- DO NOT REMOVE ----------------------------------------- and I have no