similar to: Shorewall (Openswan) IPSEC VPN MASQ Problem

I second Eero's comment, use a new IPSec daemon. Openswan was forked and became Libreswan. Paul, now a RH employee, was a main developer for the Openswan project before he and others created the Libreswan fork. https://libreswan.org/ EL6 has Openswan EL7 has Libreswan Racoon isn't all that fun to work with. If you have the option, ditch it and EL5 and move to a newer platform

Centos 5 is still soon end of life. Using it as ipsec gateway is .. Eero 21.3.2016 7.25 ip. "Mike - st257" <silvertip257 at gmail.com> kirjoitti: > On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 1:17 PM, Mike - st257 <silvertip257 at gmail.com> > wrote: > > > I second Eero's comment, use a new IPSec daemon. > > > > Openswan was forked and became Libreswan. Paul, now

Err. Sounds like security nightmare. 21.3.2016 7.47 ip. "Glenn Pierce" <glennpierce at gmail.com> kirjoitti: > Will ask my boss :) We are hosted on memset so not so easy to update > > Thanks > > On 21 March 2016 at 17:36, Eero Volotinen <eero.volotinen at iki.fi> wrote: > > Centos 5 is still soon end of life. Using it as ipsec gateway is .. > >

Hi all, I finally got my IPSec tunnel from my Fedora firewall system (running Shorewall 4.0.6) to a remote Draytek Router up-and-running, but I''m having difficulties directing traffic through the tunnel. From the output of "racoon -F -f racoon.conf" and the connection status page of the Draytek I can tell the tunnel is UP, but ping and traceroute requests to several hosts

# ipsec verify ... If you encounter network related SElinux errors, especially when using KLIPS, try disabling SElinux ... Well, it is not running KLIPS but netkey, anyways I feel not comfortable about disabling selinux on a ipsec router. I am not sure how to handle possible probems in this case, too. If I decide not to disable selinux, and I run into problems, should I a) report it to redhat

I''m getting an error when shorewall is trying to add the default routes for my multi-isp configuration. I''ve attached a shorewall dump... If anyone can give some input I''d appreciate it. RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument ERROR: Command "ip -4 route replace default scope global table 254 nexthop via 67.110.119.245 dev eth3 weight 1 nexthop via 66.29.181.113

OK - I figured out what it is but maybe someone can give an explanation here. If I use he multiple zones configuration I have to do in addition Hosts v3005 vlan3005:0.0.0.0/0 And of course this seems to be very logic since this means all ip´s on the internet. But I am still confused a lot why this is the first time I have to do it after using Shorewall over years without to be forced to say

Hi I hope someone can answer something I'm sure is quite basic. I am following the instructions at https://www.centos.org/docs/5/html/Deployment_Guide-en-US/ch-vpn.html On setting up a VPN The part I am having trouble with is when it show the /etc/racoon/racoon.conf file. But it doesn't say whay you have to do with this file. When I bring up my connection ifup bicester I get RTNETLINK

Hi, Does anyone have experience using IPSEC on CentOS in order to connect to vendor IPSEC-based VPN products (specifically Checkpoint FW1) ? Is the included IPSEC implementation sufficient, or do people have to rely on OpenSWAN or FreeSWAN ? I'd be testing tomorrow and I'm interested with experiences others have had and things to look out for. Thanks in advance, -- dag wieers, dag

Hi everyone! First of all, sorry about my bad English and the e-mails extension. I need some help to implement a VPN connection using shorewall and openswan as IPSec Tunnel. My network map: CLIENT VPN APPLIANCE --> +++INTERNET+++ --> FIREWALL --> OPENSWAN SERVER (DMZ) I have two VPN connections with two different subnets to the other end. The two of then are correctly established.

Hello, now I have spent many hours to configure openswan for VPN connections without any success. My goal: VPN Server CentOS 6 with public IPv4 VPN Client (= road warrier) from private site with NAT router or from mobile cell with Linux, Windows 7, Mac, iPhone or Android Is there any how to in the net? When I read file:///usr/share/doc/openswan-doc-2.6.32/config.html then I belive, there is

Hi, is there anybody running centos3 (el3) with a standard kernel 2.4.32 or newer, because it seems openswan versions > 2.21 don''t run with centos3(el3) anymore. But we need the newer openswan versions. Problem arise when I try to build the ipsec.o module: /usr/src/openswan-2.4.4/linux/net/ipsec/ipsec_init.c /usr/src/openswan-2.4.4/linux/net/ipsec/ipsec_init.c: In function

I looked in the yum repositories for CentOS 7 and I noticed that there are no packages for any of the major open source IPSec VPN apps - Openswan, strongSwan, etc. I'm pretty sure CentOS 6 had Openswan packages. What is the current consensus w.r.t. building an IPSec VPN "server" (concentrator, whatever) on CentOS 7, that will do site-to-site connections with Cisco hardware at

Does anyone else noticed problems after updating openswan to openswan-2.6.32-27.2.el6_5.i686 ? In our case a connection to Cisco VPN 3000 Series would no longer work. I can see in the log an ASSERTION FAILED error and the connection would remain in Pending phase 2. Mar 7 16:24:40 firewall pluto[7647]: "ciscovpntest" #2: discarding duplicate packet; already STATE_MAIN_I1 Mar 7

On 2015-04-14 11:25, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 04/14/2015 11:07 AM, Florin Andrei wrote: >> I looked in the yum repositories for CentOS 7 and I noticed that there >> are no packages for any of the major open source IPSec VPN apps - >> Openswan, strongSwan, etc. I'm pretty sure CentOS 6 had Openswan >> packages. > > libreswan replaced openswan, and is

I am trying to get a debian system with openswan 2.2 shorewall 2.1.11 + debian kernel 2.6.8 working together. I have read the documentation (IPSEC using Linux Kernel 2.6) and before I go and compile my own modules I would like to know if the standard debian kernel already has the Netfilter+ipsec patches and the policy match patches installed. Does anyone know? thanks Jim

Hello, I'm trying to get Openswan running in a CentOS 4.3 environment. I want to modify as little as possible so that the machine can be kept up to date easily. I'd rather not compile a special kernel, but if that's the only solution, no problem (I don't need NAT traversal). It's running kernel 2.6.9-34.0.2.EL. Installed the kerneldevel RPM (and kernel src rpm as well). I

Hello, I'm having a bit of trouble connecting our current CentOS Openswan server with a Vyos server via IPSec. I've posted this on the VyOS forums, but haven't had many helpful responses, so I thought I would ask here. http://forum.vyos.net/showthread.php?tid=26504&pid=29703#pid29703 Basically our Openswan configuration is as follows: conn VYOS keyingtries=0

Centos 5 is also a bit old os. Is it possible to use newer version? (like centos 7 or centos 6?) Eero 2016-02-09 19:52 GMT+02:00 Gordon Messmer <gordon.messmer at gmail.com>: > On 02/09/2016 07:04 AM, John Cenile wrote: > >> does anyone have any suggestions on what the problem might be? >> > > Not off the top of my head, but if I were you, I'd enable debugging

On 2015-04-14 11:44, Eero Volotinen wrote: > 2015-04-14 21:40 GMT+03:00 Florin Andrei <florin at andrei.myip.org>: >> >> http://serverfault.com/a/655752/24406 >> >> If that is accurate, the documentation, and the clustering / load >> balancing might tilt the balance in the direction of strongSwan. >> >> > Well, both packages can do ipsec to