similar to: Shorewall + IPsec Tunnel

Hi Everyone! I''m having problems to redirect an UDP port to an external server. My firewall have 4 interfaces: NET, LOC (192.168.0.0/24), DMZ(192.168.1.0/24), CMTC(10.0.0.0/24). On CMTC interface I have a direct connection to another network using a VPN link. I need to redirect an UDP port to on server (10.1.0.2) on CMTC zone using my local IP (192.168.0.1) for gateway. I will use

Hi everyone! I''m having time out problems when using a DNAT rule. Rule: DNAT:info cmtc loc:192.168.0.158 tcp 8011 Log: Mar 17 17:50:17 gw kernel: [1583997.524924] Shorewall:cmtc_dnat:DNAT:IN=eth3 OUT= SRC=10.1.0.2 DST=10.0.0.2 LEN=60 TOS=0x10 PREC=0x00 TTL=62 ID=4279 DF PROTO=TCP SPT=32791 DPT=8011 WINDOW=5840 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0 Telnet: root@emudar:~# telnet

Hi, I was testing around with 2.2.31, and saw that it made new extra connections to the backend imap server whenever you make a new mailbox. So client does: A001 login username password A002 create subfolder Previously, dovecot would just send the create command to the backend, but now does (including connection IDs): [conn1] 9 CREATE "subfolder" [conn1] 10 EXAMINE "INBOX"

Here is some examples of using templates for TINC configurations and settings: In your startup script, BEFORE starting TINC VPN, put a number of entries to configure your VPN: sh ./templatewriter.sh LAN LOSI101 8540 255.255.255.0 0.0.0.0 10.99.0.11 10.98.0.11 ConnectTo=LOSI102 ConnectTo= ConnectTo= **PUT MORE ENTRIES HERE FOR MORE COMPLEX VPN setups ######Templatewriter.sh #!/bin/bash

Hi everyone! I need to create a rule that return back the packages sender. For example, if the IP 200.xxx.xxx.xxx tries to connect to my firewall in one specific port, the rules turns back the connection to 200.xxx.xxx.xxx. With this rule the Engineers Department will test some equipments with GSM chips. One point to observe is that we don''t know witch IP will connect to this rules.

Hi There, Due to shortage computer, I need to install Apache to my Shorewall box (192.168.1.1) But the real web server is on another box (192.168.1.2) I tried to put rule: DNAT net loc:192.168.168.1 tcp 80 But everytime www connection coming in, it will hit my shorewall Any solution? Cheer Access Yahoo!7 Mail on your mobile. Anytime. Anywhere. Show me how:

Hey First, apologies if this went out twice. I sent the original email from an odd email configuration (essentially from an alias of what I signed up as). I searched and noticed that my post did not appear and I did not get a bounce back so I was confused. I waited a few days before resending. So apologies if this goes out twice. I am not trying to spam. I was hoping someone could help me with

I''ve been digging through the various manuals and am a bit irritated with limitation on the rules system Why do I have to specify a source zone to allow a source IP range on all zones? There is no iptables requirement for anything more than a source address, so I don''t understand why all:<ip> does not just add an accept rule into the head of the INPUT chain or even simply

Hi, is there anybody running centos3 (el3) with a standard kernel 2.4.32 or newer, because it seems openswan versions > 2.21 don''t run with centos3(el3) anymore. But we need the newer openswan versions. Problem arise when I try to build the ipsec.o module: /usr/src/openswan-2.4.4/linux/net/ipsec/ipsec_init.c /usr/src/openswan-2.4.4/linux/net/ipsec/ipsec_init.c: In function

Hello, it looks like the usual way to do ipsec on centos5 won't work anymore on centos6 I installed ipsec-tools but an interface type IPsec is not recognized by the kernel ifup ipsec0 Device does not seem to be present, delaying initialization. I am not planning to use the awful OpenSwan, I Want to sue the Kame implementation which was working fine on CentOS5 any hints ? thank you

Hi, I have setup a IPSEC VPN using Openswan to connect a Draytek router to a CentOS 5.2/Shorewall 4.2.9 firewall. The VPN establishes OK but I''m getting a problem with packets from the left hand subnet getting masqueraded rather than routed down the IPSEC VPN as though they were going out onto the net. I''ve spent the last day searching Google and so far I''ve hit a

I second Eero's comment, use a new IPSec daemon. Openswan was forked and became Libreswan. Paul, now a RH employee, was a main developer for the Openswan project before he and others created the Libreswan fork. https://libreswan.org/ EL6 has Openswan EL7 has Libreswan Racoon isn't all that fun to work with. If you have the option, ditch it and EL5 and move to a newer platform

I looked in the yum repositories for CentOS 7 and I noticed that there are no packages for any of the major open source IPSec VPN apps - Openswan, strongSwan, etc. I'm pretty sure CentOS 6 had Openswan packages. What is the current consensus w.r.t. building an IPSec VPN "server" (concentrator, whatever) on CentOS 7, that will do site-to-site connections with Cisco hardware at

Hello, now I have spent many hours to configure openswan for VPN connections without any success. My goal: VPN Server CentOS 6 with public IPv4 VPN Client (= road warrier) from private site with NAT router or from mobile cell with Linux, Windows 7, Mac, iPhone or Android Is there any how to in the net? When I read file:///usr/share/doc/openswan-doc-2.6.32/config.html then I belive, there is

Hello, i need to configure a centos 6.3 - server as an l2tp/ipsec-client. I have no idea how I there previous or if this is even possible. Where one might find appropriate instructions? Google is not very helpful, without any idea. Thanks cami

Hello, I'm having a bit of trouble connecting our current CentOS Openswan server with a Vyos server via IPSec. I've posted this on the VyOS forums, but haven't had many helpful responses, so I thought I would ask here. http://forum.vyos.net/showthread.php?tid=26504&pid=29703#pid29703 Basically our Openswan configuration is as follows: conn VYOS keyingtries=0

Hello everybody. I would like to do some kind of shaping inside an ipsec tunnel implemented by Openswan and linux 2.6.18.x with xfrm (no KLIPS): for example, to limit outbound smtp traffic inside the tunnel. Question: where should I attach the qdisc to? Eth0? I''m asking this, because tcpdump only see the ESP packet on the eth0 and not the ''clear'' packet. TIA This is my

Centos 5 is still soon end of life. Using it as ipsec gateway is .. Eero 21.3.2016 7.25 ip. "Mike - st257" <silvertip257 at gmail.com> kirjoitti: > On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 1:17 PM, Mike - st257 <silvertip257 at gmail.com> > wrote: > > > I second Eero's comment, use a new IPSec daemon. > > > > Openswan was forked and became Libreswan. Paul, now

Err. Sounds like security nightmare. 21.3.2016 7.47 ip. "Glenn Pierce" <glennpierce at gmail.com> kirjoitti: > Will ask my boss :) We are hosted on memset so not so easy to update > > Thanks > > On 21 March 2016 at 17:36, Eero Volotinen <eero.volotinen at iki.fi> wrote: > > Centos 5 is still soon end of life. Using it as ipsec gateway is .. > >

Hello, I'm trying to get Openswan running in a CentOS 4.3 environment. I want to modify as little as possible so that the machine can be kept up to date easily. I'd rather not compile a special kernel, but if that's the only solution, no problem (I don't need NAT traversal). It's running kernel 2.6.9-34.0.2.EL. Installed the kerneldevel RPM (and kernel src rpm as well). I