similar to: ip alias and masq

I want to use lastest version of Shorewall in my fresh debian squeeze instalation, so I follow http://www.shorewall.net/Install.htm#Debian but, modify preferences file was not enough for me, I have to modify/add some other files in /etc/apt/ directory: 1.) include testing repo to source.list 2.) add APT::Default-Release "stable"; to apt.conf and pinning all other packages to stable

I remember to see something about that in shorewall.net some time ago, but I could not find it today ... The case : Debian Etch, Shorewall 3.2.6, squid3 and Apache 2 . The first 3 where already running fine for some time ... Now I need to setup an Apache server to allow some web mannagement, things like PHPsysinfo, phppgadmin, just for internal net, no web access . but port 80 is redirected to

Hi I have a routing problem with the OpenVPN service running directly on the firewall itself. I have two DSL connections, one with a static IP (and my default route), the other with a dynamic IP. The first is called ISBD in the configs, the second is called SAIX. Connecting to the OpenVPN via ISBD works well, the packets route perfectly. Connecting via SAIX does not. In the attached status.txt,

Hi to all For is just az concept question : There are a need to change something in Squid3 config when it are running in the same box as shorewall with 2 ISP ? I''ve been thinking in do this at home, as a proof of concept for future implememtations ... I allways use Roberto''s Debian package to implement Shorewall . Fábio Rabelo

I'm trying to get Samba on a Mac OS X box running as a PDC with an LDAP backend. I've read through all of the major walkthroughs I can find, and we've actually already got it running very nicely as a file server; people are currently authenticating against a different PDC and then mapping drives from the Samba box in question. However, I'd like it to be the PDC eventually, but

I had a problem similar to my current one a week or so ago, and I was encouraged to upgrade from Samba 2.2.9 to 3.0.7, which I did. Now that I've completed that nightmare, the problem I initially set out to fix is still there, just different. Namely: I am trying to set up Samba 3.0.7 on a SuSE 9.1 box as an LDAP PDC whose only job will be authentication. Our LDAP server is on a separate

My guinea pig laptop has only a / partition, and a small /boot partition. I installed the ext3 kernel succesfully (I think). Now, how do I get / converted to ext3? I'm thinking: * Use mkbootdisk on a floppy, to create a boot disk with the ext3 kernel. * Boot off the floppy. * Follow the instructions to convert / to ext3. * Change the filesystem type in /etc/fstab to ext3. * Reboot.

All, So I got passed my initial hurdles with merb 0.4. And all seems to work very nicely. Thank you all for your help ! One thing though, why should I have to bounce the merb server when I change my controller or associated classes ? Am I missing something ? I am having flash back to my java days where I now have to reflect on what changed and bounce the server accordingly...

Dear all, I get a problem with masq, why it doesn''t work for connect to internet? my masq configuration /etc/shorewall/masq eth0 10.2.0.0/16 202.158.1.99 but if my masq file without 202.158.1.99 it work! /etc/shorewall/masq eth0 10.2.0.0/16 and the ip nat will be same with ip address eth0. FYI: IP number (202.158.1.99) just valid IP but doesn''t have interface

I just noticed after upgrade from Asterisk 1.4.39 to 1.8.8 my caller ID is not working WARNING[1671]: chan_sip.c:13956 check_auth: username mismatch, have <11>, digest has <pstn-1270> NOTICE[1671]: chan_sip.c:22048 handle_request_invite: Failed to authenticate device "KMIEC Z" <sip:7804715665 at 10.0.0.110>;tag=1c976040515 -- Joseph

I''m planning a multi isp setup and cafully read the documentation. One thing that bothers me is the masq file. The example uses a single ip address on each public interface. I have multiple addresses on both public interfaces (16 on one and 64 on the other). I''m a bit confused about what to put in the masq file in this situation. Any insights would be appreciated. Ronald --

Hello, on my old system I''m using ipchains. Can anyone help me with converting rule /sbin/ipchains -A forward -j MASQ -s source_addr -d destination_addr 443 -p tcp to shorewall. I know that I can write eth0 source_addr to /etc/shorewall/masq file but I can''t found where I can specify the destination address. The reason for this is to allow one user (computer) access only to

I am wanting to verify that I am properly using the MASQ for a series of hosts. I have 2 providers, and my providers file has the contents: #NAME NUMBER MARK DUPLICATE INTERFACE GATEWAY OPTIONS COPY l3 1 100 main eth0.100 1.18.139.1 track,loose,fallback eth1 ws 2 200 main eth0.101 1.155.136.193

Hi, after kernel upgrade to 2.4.23 my existing configuration of shorewal 1.4.8 will not start / it fail on DNAT and/or masq with message: "iptables: Invalid argument" / I founded some similar problems description - see links bellow, but there is no solution how to get work shorewall with DNAT and masq with 2.4.23 kernel. http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0312.0/0268.html

In /etc/shorewall/masq I have: eth0 eth1 eth0 vmnet1 eth0 vmnet8 ------------- eth0 is my default route to the Linksys router connected to the cable modem. eth1 is my connection to 192.168.1 subnet and it is the gateway for all other machines on this subnet. My routing table is: # netstat -nr Kernel IP routing table Destination

hi, in the masq file''s documentation, there is a sentence: "If you have a static IP on that interface, listing it here makes processing of output packets a little less expensive for the firewall." this realy means that SNAT to the primary address is less expensive than a MASQ rules in the netfilter? is this documented anywhere in iptables/netfilter? thanks. -- Levente

Andrzej, On 7/14/19 8:02 AM, Andrzej Warzynski wrote: > This is still very early stages, but you can be my guinea pig: > > https://github.com/banach-space/llvm-tutor > > It's a tutorial that I've been preparing recently and am hoping to > present somewhere at some point :-) I believe that it already covers 1), > 2) and 3). I haven't had the time to work on 4).

Hi everybody. I''m sorry to bother you because I''m probably doing something wrong, but I have already read the documentation and I have been using shorewall for quite a long time. I recently installed 3.2.3 from source (but there was the same problem with 3.0.7 from apt-get ... -t unstable) The thing is, that I can''t get masq working. Maybe this is because

All, A couple of new build platforms have come into the picture since the last FXRuby release and I''m trying to make sure they''re supported. That is to say, I want to be able to provide precompiled binary gems so that users on those platforms don''t have to build everything from source. I think I''m there, but I could use your help testing if you have

Florian, On 7/10/19 2:17 PM, Florian Hahn wrote: > http://www.cs.cornell.edu/~asampson/blog/llvm.html describes how to > create an out-of-source pass (see 'Let’s Write a Pass’). I think it > is for LLVM 3.8 though. Thanks for pointing that out. I had actually recently stumbled across that page (and the GitHub repository it references, https://github.com/sampsyo/llvm-pass-skeleton)