similar to: Re: shorewall-4.0.2 & openvz

Hello, I run Shorewall 2.0.3a backport on a debian woody box (with 2.4.18 homemade kernel). When I start shorewall I got the following errors. Oct 30 11:13:12 fwr modprobe: modprobe: Can''t locate module ipt_conntrack Oct 30 11:13:17 fwr modprobe: modprobe: Can''t locate module ipt_pkttype Oct 30 11:13:18 fwr modprobe: modprobe: Can''t locate module ipt_pkttype Oct 30

hi all, i want to try htb3 with imq downloaded & patched imq & htb3 with kernel-2.4.18 on rh7.2 but got STUCK on step 1 :( this are what i did can anyone guide me what went wrong on the first step itself !! [root@cab1 root]# modprobe imq numdevs=1 modprobe: Can''t locate module imq [root@cab1 root]# [root@cab1 root]# tc qdisc add dev imq0 handle 1: root htb default 1 Cannot find

I''m trying to setup Shorewall 2.0.8 with the one-interface settings on my LFS (kernel 2.6.5) system. I''ve read the troubleshooting guide, recompiled my kernel with just about every netfilter/iptables module I could find, but I''m still getting this error: # tail /tmp/trace + prefix=Shorewall:smurfs:DROP: + ''['' 22 -gt 29 '']'' +

Hi all.. I have found some problems on smbfs module in 2.4.18 kernel. I compiled it by myself (not the very first kernel compilation in my life ;-)) and then I have got it. Looks like it touch smbfs module as when I recompile 2.4.18 modules with smbfs sources changed to sources of smbfs from 2.4.17 problem disappears!! My mainboard is Abit BE6 with Pentium III 450 MHz. I am using SuSE 7.3 with

On Sat, Dec 24, 2005 at 11:03:36PM +0300, Andrey J. Melnikoff (TEMHOTA) wrote: > Hello. Hi Andrey, > Please, CC me, i'm not subscribed. > > Kernel 2.6.15-rc6 OOPS: > > kernel: general protection fault: 0000 [#1] > kernel: SMP > kernel: Modules linked in: ipt_REDIRECT ipt_LOG ipt_TOS ipt_TCPMSS ipt_tos > ip_nat_ftp ipt_tcpmss iptable_nat ip_nat iptable_mangle

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=529 Summary: OOPS in nf_conntrack_ipv6 with fragmented UDPv6 Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.6.x Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P2 Component: nf_conntrack AssignedTo:

Hi, on a system RedHat 8.0, only on this, not on other various RedHat8.0, I have see the follow strange error in /var/log/{messages,boot.log} ..... After the boot all it seems to work, the modules is loads.... I have already tried to install other versions of kernel but the problem is always the same one :-(( Someone has some idea of what is happening? Thanks... Dario Lesca

Hi all, I?m using dovecot successfully since some years. My current setup is postfix and dovecot on one vserver. This works great so far. ??????????? +--------------------+ eMail in??? | VSERVER1?????????? | +---------->+ MX 1 (Master)????? | ??????????? | POSTFIX MTA??????? | ??????????? | DOVECOT ALL Folders| ??????????? +-----^--------------+?????????? ????????????????? |

I just installed stock shorewall-3.4.2 and shorewall-perl-3.9.0 under Cygwin on this Windows XP system. I downloaded the two-interface sample and modified shorewall.conf by adding "SHOREWALL_COMPILER=perl". I copied a capabilities file from my desktop and: teastep@EASTEPNC6000 ~/Configs/test $ shorewall check . Checking... Checking /home/teastep/Configs/test/zones... Checking

I just installed stock shorewall-3.4.2 and shorewall-perl-3.9.0 under Cygwin on this Windows XP system. I downloaded the two-interface sample and modified shorewall.conf by adding "SHOREWALL_COMPILER=perl". I copied a capabilities file from my desktop and: teastep@EASTEPNC6000 ~/Configs/test $ shorewall check . Checking... Checking /home/teastep/Configs/test/zones... Checking

Hello all, It''s my first letter on this list, and, my English is not very well. Please take me indulgence for grammar/syntax and over erorrs :)) I have trouble for acl''s of ip range. But, acl for one host (with ip adress) work fine. Please help me for make work acl/find erorr in acl. Becouse I''m new shorewall user, I maked test configuration on Virtual Mashine

I said: > # MSS CLAMPING > # Your kernel must have CONFIG_IP_NF_TARGET_TCPMSS set. > > I''ve activated the option, but to no result watsoever. > Checked my kernel config, and it states that CONFIG_IP_NF_TARGET_TCPMSS is a > loadable module, that should be loaded on demand. > Simon said: > Did you try adding it to /etc/shorewall/modules ? Actually, no I

Hello, My hoster updated its kernel packages... It contained some old problems that should have been fixed. My servers have now a wonderful 2.6.21.5 kernel + grsec running. Both are running Debian 4.0 (stable release). mx:/etc/shorewall# iptables --version iptables v1.3.6 mx:/etc/shorewall# uname -a Linux mx.network-hosting.com 2.6.21.5-grsec-xxxx-grs-ipv4-32 #1 SMP Fri Jul 27 17:18:23 CEST

Trying to use it with Sven Smart RM2000 (seems to be an OEM clone of Sysgration Smart RM UPS: http://www.sysgration.com/product.asp?KID=7). I have just compiled the latest svn trunk. Unfortunately it does not work with that UPS: dbely at vserver1:~/nut-svn$ sudo /usr/local/ups/bin/megatec_usb -u root -a myups Network UPS Tools 2.1.0 - Megatec protocol driver 1.5.3 [megatec_usb] Carlos Rodrigues

Hello, shorewall6 seem to have problems duplicating the main routing table. shorewall6 tries to add the fe80::/64 route of every ipv6 configured interface to routing table 1. The first route applies but the other ones not. If i try to add the routes manually to routing table 1 i have to add the first fe80::/64 route and append not add the other ones. does not work: ip -6 route add table 1

Hello, loading conntrack resolve my problem ... layer 7 have got a dependency with conntrack but doesn''t load it automaticaly... so module is loaded but no packets match with l7-protocols ... reported as a bug http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1596065&group_id=80085&atid=558668 regards ArcosCom Linux User a écrit : > With: >

Hi all, I have been trying to reproduce an analysis from Douglas Montgomery?s book on design and analysis of experiments. Table 6.10 of example 6.2 on page 246, gives a table as follows: > NPK <- expand.grid(A=mp,B=mp,C=mp,D=mp) > Rate <- c(45,71,48,65,68,60,80,65,43,100,45,104,75,86,70,96) > filtration <- cbind(NPK,Rate) > filtration A B C D Rate 1 - - - - 45 2

Hi, We have 2 offices interconnected with a VPN. This is the policy file in both of the Firewalls: fw loc ACCEPT loc fw ACCEPT #fw net DROP info fw net ACCEPT loc net DROP info loc vpn ACCEPT vpn loc

Hello I''ve setuped a QOS bridge under debian 3.1 using 2.6.18.3 kernel + iptables 1.3.6 I''ve patched the kernel an Iptables with esfq+layer7 without problems. This simple script doesn''t log nothing ... And I''m sure to have eMule traffic (I''ve checked with tcpdump ) If I remove " -m layer7 --l7proto edonkey \" line I can see

Hello list, I discover strange behaviour of shaping traffic that i setup from Shorewall-4.0.2. I know that this is not Shorewall problem but may be somebody from list can help me or explain this situation. I have follow interfaces in 'tcdevices' files: #INTERFACE IN-BANDWITH OUT-BANDWIDTH # $EXT_IF 500kbit 248kbit $INT1_IF 500mbit