similar to: ssh ethernet tunnel performance problem

On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 05:19:17PM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 10:27:08AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 05:09:27PM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > > > Linux supports running the RPMsg protocol over the VirtIO transport > > > protocol, but currently there is only support for VirtIO clients and >

On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 05:19:17PM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 10:27:08AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 05:09:27PM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > > > Linux supports running the RPMsg protocol over the VirtIO transport > > > protocol, but currently there is only support for VirtIO clients and >

Hi Michael, Thanks for your review. On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 03:23:37PM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 08:05:36PM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > > v3: > > - address several checkpatch warnings > > - address comments from Mathieu Poirier > > > > v2: > > - update patch #5 with a correct vhost_dev_init() prototype > > -

Hi Michael, Thanks for your review. On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 03:23:37PM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 08:05:36PM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > > v3: > > - address several checkpatch warnings > > - address comments from Mathieu Poirier > > > > v2: > > - update patch #5 with a correct vhost_dev_init() prototype > > -

Hi Michael, On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 08:26:53AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 05:09:23PM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Now that virtio-rpmsg endianness fixes have been merged we can > > proceed with the next step. > > OK my attempts to resolve conflicts just created a mess. You just need to apply my previous

Hi Michael, On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 08:26:53AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 05:09:23PM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Now that virtio-rpmsg endianness fixes have been merged we can > > proceed with the next step. > > OK my attempts to resolve conflicts just created a mess. You just need to apply my previous

Hi Arnaud, On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 05:21:02PM +0200, Arnaud POULIQUEN wrote: > Hi Guennadi, > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Guennadi Liakhovetski <guennadi.liakhovetski at linux.intel.com> > > Sent: jeudi 17 septembre 2020 07:47 > > To: Arnaud POULIQUEN <arnaud.pouliquen at st.com> > > Cc: kvm at vger.kernel.org; linux-remoteproc at

Hi Arnaud, On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 05:21:02PM +0200, Arnaud POULIQUEN wrote: > Hi Guennadi, > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Guennadi Liakhovetski <guennadi.liakhovetski at linux.intel.com> > > Sent: jeudi 17 septembre 2020 07:47 > > To: Arnaud POULIQUEN <arnaud.pouliquen at st.com> > > Cc: kvm at vger.kernel.org; linux-remoteproc at

On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 05:09:27PM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > Linux supports running the RPMsg protocol over the VirtIO transport > protocol, but currently there is only support for VirtIO clients and > no support for a VirtIO server. This patch adds a vhost-based RPMsg > server implementation. > > Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <guennadi.liakhovetski at

On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 05:09:27PM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > Linux supports running the RPMsg protocol over the VirtIO transport > protocol, but currently there is only support for VirtIO clients and > no support for a VirtIO server. This patch adds a vhost-based RPMsg > server implementation. > > Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <guennadi.liakhovetski at

Hi Michael, ...back from holidays and still unsure what your preferred solution for the message layout would be: On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 02:32:43PM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > Hi Michael, > > Thanks for a review. > > On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 09:44:15AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 05:19:17PM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:

Hi Arnaud, On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 09:47:45AM +0200, Arnaud POULIQUEN wrote: > Hi Guennadi, > > On 9/18/20 7:44 AM, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > > Hi Arnaud, > > > > On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 05:21:02PM +0200, Arnaud POULIQUEN wrote: > >> Hi Guennadi, > >> > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: Guennadi Liakhovetski

Hi Arnaud, On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 09:47:45AM +0200, Arnaud POULIQUEN wrote: > Hi Guennadi, > > On 9/18/20 7:44 AM, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > > Hi Arnaud, > > > > On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 05:21:02PM +0200, Arnaud POULIQUEN wrote: > >> Hi Guennadi, > >> > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: Guennadi Liakhovetski

Update: I looked through VirtIO 1.0 and 1.1 specs, data format their, including byte order, is defined on a per-device type basis. RPMsg is indeed included in the spec as device type 7, but that's the only mention of it in both versions. It seems RPMsg over VirtIO isn't standardised yet. Also it looks like newer interface definitions specify using "guest native endianness"

Update: I looked through VirtIO 1.0 and 1.1 specs, data format their, including byte order, is defined on a per-device type basis. RPMsg is indeed included in the spec as device type 7, but that's the only mention of it in both versions. It seems RPMsg over VirtIO isn't standardised yet. Also it looks like newer interface definitions specify using "guest native endianness"

Hi Arnaud, On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 02:13:23PM +0200, Arnaud POULIQUEN wrote: > Hi Guennadi, > > On 9/1/20 5:11 PM, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Next update: > > > > v6: > > - rename include/linux/virtio_rpmsg.h -> include/linux/rpmsg/virtio.h > > > > v5: > > - don't hard-code message layout > > >

Hi Arnaud, On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 02:13:23PM +0200, Arnaud POULIQUEN wrote: > Hi Guennadi, > > On 9/1/20 5:11 PM, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Next update: > > > > v6: > > - rename include/linux/virtio_rpmsg.h -> include/linux/rpmsg/virtio.h > > > > v5: > > - don't hard-code message layout > > >

On Mon, Jun 08, 2020 at 05:19:06AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Mon, Jun 08, 2020 at 11:11:00AM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > > Update: I looked through VirtIO 1.0 and 1.1 specs, data format their, > > including byte order, is defined on a per-device type basis. RPMsg is > > indeed included in the spec as device type 7, but that's the only > >

On Mon, Jun 08, 2020 at 05:19:06AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Mon, Jun 08, 2020 at 11:11:00AM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > > Update: I looked through VirtIO 1.0 and 1.1 specs, data format their, > > including byte order, is defined on a per-device type basis. RPMsg is > > indeed included in the spec as device type 7, but that's the only > >

Hi Jason, On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 02:01:53PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > On 2020/5/28 ??2:05, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > > v3: > > - address several checkpatch warnings > > - address comments from Mathieu Poirier > > > > v2: > > - update patch #5 with a correct vhost_dev_init() prototype > > - drop patch #6 - it depends on a different patch,