similar to: Kernel BUG: __tree_mod_log_rewind

Hello, I'm doing a comparative analysis of mammal brain and body size data. I'm following Charlie Nunn and Natalie Cooper's instructions for "Running PGLS in R using caper". I run into the following error when I create my comparative dataset, combining my phylogenetic tree (mammaltree) and taxon measures (mammaldata): "Error in phy$node.label[which(newNb > 0) -

Hi there, > > I am using the function pgls in the CAPER package, everything seems to run > fine except for one of my variables. > When using this variable as continuous the anova works without problem, > but if using the same variable as factor (in fact, this is what it is), the > program returns this answer: > > Error in terms.formula(formula, data = data) : >

When replaying a log tree with qgroups enabled, tree_mod_log_rewind does a sanity-check of the number of items against the maximum possible number. It calculates that number with the nodesize of fs_root. Unfortunately fs_root is not yet set at this stage. So instead use the nodesize from tree_root, which is already initialized. Signed-off-by: Arne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net> ---

Dear R experts, I hope this is the right list for my question. As a newcomer in R, I am testing the R CAPER package, applying a simple regression on a phylogeny tree with three binary traits: (t1, t2, t3). My goal is to test the sensitivity to a correlation between t1 and t3. But if a correlation of 100% is considered (i.e. t3 = t1). The pgls method of CAPER seems to crash: You can find there

If there''s an ongoing transaction when the uuid scan kthread attempts to create one, the kthread will block, waiting for that transaction to finish while it''s keeping locks on the tree root, and in turn the existing transaction is waiting for those locks to be free. The stack trace reported by the kernel follows. [36700.671601] INFO: task btrfs-uuid:15480 blocked for more than

## I clicked the send-button too quickly, before changing the title of the message etc... Sorry.## I am running following phylogenetic analyses with the caper package: data=read.table(file="data.txt",header=T,sep="\t") tree = read.nexus("Tree.nex") primate = comparative.data(phy=tree, data=data,              names.col=Species, vcv=TRUE, na.omit=FALSE,

The freeze rwsem is taken by sb_start_intwrite() and dropped during the commit_ or end_transaction(). In the async case, that happens in a worker thread. Tell lockdep the calling thread is releasing ownership of the rwsem and the async thread is picking it up. Josef and I worked out a more complicated solution that made the async commit thread join and potentially get a later transaction, but

This idea is from ext4. By this patch, we can make the dio write parallel, and improve the performance. We needn''t worry about the race between dio write and truncate, because the truncate need wait untill all the dio write end. And we also needn''t worry about the race between dio write and punch hole, because we have extent lock to protect our operation. I ran fio to test the

Hello, (this is a recap of yesterday''s discussion on BTRFS IRC, also to save relevant pastes before pastebins expire) I have my /home on btrfs; a cronjob makes one snapshot every 30 minutes; these snapshots are kept for 24-48 hours, then deleted in batches. This is a 16K Leaf/Node BTRFS on top of mdadm RAID1. As system uptime approached 2 weeks, I started noticing that the free space

still digging at this: [2003/01/20 14:26:38, 2] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:ldapsam_connect_system(421) ldap_connect_system: succesful connection to the LDAP server [2003/01/20 14:26:38, 4] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:ldapsam_open(472) The LDAP server is succesful connected [2003/01/20 14:26:38, 4] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:ldapsam_getsampwnam(1573) We don't find this user [Administrator] count=0 [2003/01/20

Following up on this -- on my system, I have 69 packages installed that appear to provide something like a confint() method: h <- help.search("confint", agrep = FALSE) p <- sort(unique(h$matches$Package)) length(p) ## [1] 69 p [1] "bamlss" "bbmle" "binom" "brglm2" [5] "broom"

Hi I am hitting this Warning reproducible, the workload is a ceph osd, kernel ist 3.1.0-rc5. Best Regards, martin [ 5472.099766] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 5472.099833] WARNING: at fs/btrfs/inode.c:2193 btrfs_orphan_commit_root+0xb0/0xc0 [btrfs]() [ 5472.099838] Hardware name: MS-96B3 [ 5472.099842] Modules linked in: radeon ttm drm_kms_helper drm i2c_algo_bit psmouse sp5100_tco

? Tue, 21 May 2024 08:00:11 +0000 Dario Strbenac via R-devel <r-devel at r-project.org> ?????: > Would a less resource-intensive value, such as 1, be a safer default > CPU value for confint? Which confint() method do you have in mind? There is at least four of them by default in R, and many additional classes could make use of stats:::confint.default by implementing vcov(). >

System was booted with PCI graphics card first in VGA text mode. Loading nouveau from there on causes the following BUG, after what kernel produces trace over trace until overflowing its stack. (trace captured via netconsole) [ 154.323717] wmi: Mapper loaded [ 154.735793] nouveau 0000:02:00.0: enabling device (0004 -> 0006) [ 154.743189] ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNK5] enabled at IRQ 16 [

Hi all, Last week we had 2 times an "uncorrectable ecc memory error" crash on our server on the same memory module. After removing the faulty module and restarting the server, everything was working again. However, yesterday we had a soft lockup and had to restart the server again. No warning or ecc error this time. Everything is working now, but we want to avoid this in the future

Hi, everyone I have some questions with the OCFS2 when using it as vm-store. With Ubuntu 1204, kernel version is 3.2.40, and ocfs2-tools version is 1.6.4. As the network configure change, there are some issues as the log below. Why is there the information of "Node 255 (he) is the Recovery Master for the dead node 255" in the syslog? Why the host ZHJD-VM6 is blocked until it reboot

Hi, everyone I have some questions with the OCFS2 when using it as vm-store. With Ubuntu 1204, kernel version is 3.2.40, and ocfs2-tools version is 1.6.4. As the network configure change, there are some issues as the log below. Why is there the information of "Node 255 (he) is the Recovery Master for the dead node 255" in the syslog? Why the host ZHJD-VM6 is blocked until it reboot

I have 2 new boxes that I cannot use yet because of problems supporting these newer chipsets in 5.1. Does anyone know when the CD version of 5.0 x86-64 that has support for these chipsets be available on any on a Centos mirror? Has the support for these chipsets been added to yum yet? Here are my latest results with these chipsets and Centos 5.1 1. Asus P5K, E6850, P35 Chipset: Does not

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31644 Summary: Nouveau driver with "Gigabyte nVidia 9600GT" - black screen Product: xorg Version: unspecified Platform: x86-64 (AMD64) OS/Version: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau

I tried to unmount a btrfs filesystem located in a external usb hard drive. This belonged to a raid1 data and metadata filesystem mounted in degraded mode. Unfortunately, I couldn''t save the image of filesystem but I could see this error in kern.log: Aug 4 02:23:55 rohan kernel: [ 3747.840027] usb 1-3: new high-speed USB device number 8 using ehci_hcd Aug 4 02:23:55 rohan kernel: [