similar to: "device delete" kills contents

Hello I have a CentOS 6.6 Server with 13 disks in a RAID 6. Some weeks ago, i upgraded it to 17 disks, two of them configured as spare. The reshape worked like normal in the beginning. But at 69% it stopped. md2 : active raid6 sdj1[0] sdg1[18](S) sdh1[2] sdi1[5] sdm1[15] sds1[12] sdr1[14] sdk1[9] sdo1[6] sdn1[13] sdl1[8] sdd1[20] sdf1[19] sdq1[16] sdb1[10] sde1[17](S) sdc1[21] 19533803520

Hello, I am installing Two Node cluster when I automount the file systems I am getting o2net_connect_expired error and it is not mounting the cluster filesystems if I mount the cluster file systems manually as mount -a it is mounting the file systems without any issues. 1.If I bring Node1 up with Node2 to down cluster file system is automounting fine without any issues. 2.I checked the

Hi, I am on SLES 10, SP1, x86_64, running the distribution rpm's of ocfs: ocfs2console-1.2.3-0.7 ocfs2-tools-1.2.3-0.7 I have a two node ocfs2 cluster configured. One node died (manual reset), and the second started immediately to have problems on accessing the file system for the following reason from the logs: Transport endpoint not connected. a mounted.ocfs2 on the still living

On 06/25/2015 01:20 PM, Chris Adams wrote: > ...It's basically a way to assemble one arbitrary set of block devices > and then divide them into another arbitrary set of block devices, but > now separate from the underlying physical structure. > Regular partitions have various limitations (one big one on Linux > being that modifying the partition table of a disk with in-use

Hi, I am trying to create a 10 drive raid6 array. OS is Centos 5.3 (64 Bit) All 10 drives are 2T in size. device sd{a,b,c,d,e,f} are on my motherboard device sd{i,j,k,l} are on a pci express areca card (relevant lspci info below) #lspci 06:0e.0 RAID bus controller: Areca Technology Corp. ARC-1210 4-Port PCI-Express to SATA RAID Controller The controller is set to JBOD the drives. All

Everyone, We just had a pretty bad crash on one of production boxes and the ext2 filesystem on the data partition of our box had some major filesystem corruption. Needless to say, I am now looking into converting the filesystem to ext3 and I have some questions regarding ext3 and Linux software RAID. I have read that previously there were some issues running ext3 on a software raid device

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97065 Bug ID: 97065 Summary: memory leak under Xwayland with old sdl1 applications Product: xorg Version: unspecified Hardware: Other OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau Assignee: nouveau

Hi, everyone, I have found the API snapshotCreateXML() can create a snapshot for a virtual machine, and the xml configuration file - snapshot.xml as folllows: <domainsnapshot> <name>snapshot01</name> <description>Snapshot of OS install and updates</description> <disks> <disk name='vda' snapshot='external'> <source

Thanks for you reply! Firstly, I'm very sorry I forgot introduce the scenarios in my experiments. Supposing a case, I have a virtual machine with two disks. One is mounted as a root partition and the other is data partition and the second disk is an iscsi lun, that is to say, not a local disk or image. Now the result wanted is that creating a snapshot for the root disk but not for the data

Thank you! But snapshot-create-as will traverse all disks of the virtual machine and create snapshots for all of them. In my case, I want to create snapshot for root disk. What's more. I understand "--diskspec" is a description of the disk. Do you mean it's used to specify a single disk to snapshot. 在 2013-06-26 09:10:31，"Gao Yongwei" <itxx00@gmail.com> 写道：

try snapshot-create-as like below: virsh snapshot-create-as vm --disk-only --diskspec "vda,snapshot=external" 2013/6/25 cmcc.dylan <dx10years@126.com> > > Hi, everyone, > I have found the API snapshotCreateXML() can create a snapshot for a > virtual machine, and the xml configuration file - snapshot.xml as folllows: > <domainsnapshot> >

Hiya, Is there any reason (and anything to worry about) if disk target IDs don''t start at 0 (zero). For some reason mine are like this (3 controllers - 1 onboard and 2 PCIe); AVAILABLE DISK SELECTIONS: 0. c8t0d0 <ATA -ST9160314AS -SDM1 cyl 19454 alt 2 hd 255 sec 63> /pci at 0,0/pci10de,cb84 at 5/disk at 0,0 1. c8t1d0 <ATA -ST9160314AS -SDM1

CentOS 6.3, x86_64. I have noticed when building a new software RAID-6 array on CentOS 6.3 that the mismatch_cnt grows monotonically while the array is building: # cat /proc/mdstat Personalities : [raid6] [raid5] [raid4] md11 : active raid6 sdg[5] sdf[4] sde[3] sdd[2] sdc[1] sdb[0] 3904890880 blocks super 1.2 level 6, 512k chunk, algorithm 2 [6/6] [UUUUUU]

Hi: I have an NFS volume that I'm trying to resize a partition on. Something about the fdisk process is corrupting something on the drive Before running fdisk, I can mount the volume find: $ mount /dev/sdo1 /home ... and the volume is mounted fine. And, $ e2fsck -f /dev/sdo1 /dev/sdo1: clean, ... But then I run fdisk to rewrite the partition table of this drive, to expand the /dev/sdo1

I've been experiencing delays access data off my file server since I upgraded to 5.3... either I hosed something, have bad hardware or very unlikely, found a bug. When reading or writing data, the stream to the hdd's stops every 5-10 min and %iowait goes through the roof. I checked the logs and they are filled with this diagnostic data that I can't readily decipher. my setup

I am unable to mount an ext3 filesystem on RHEL AS 2.1. This is not the boot or root filesystem. When I try to mount the file system, I get the following error: mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sdj1, or too many mounted file systems When I try to run e2fsck -vvfy /dev/sdj1 I get the following error: Group descriptors look bad... trying backup blocks...

>Almost certainly your drive is going bad. On Linux I'd tell you to check dmesg for drive errors, I don't know what the FreeBSD equivalent is. But I strongly recommend that you treat that drive as "going to fail any second". I'm not sure that this is the reason. I see the error regardless of the USB disks that I use. And I have a lot of USB disks,10 disks. No,I

Happened again : root at Z390-AORUS-PRO-DEST:/mnt/zroot-133/A_FILES/Backup/FreeBSD# sudo rsync -azvvP FreeBSD-141-UFS-sdc-DarkMatter.img /mnt/sdj1/OS/Backup/BSD/FreeBSD sending incremental file list delta-transmission disabled for local transfer or --whole-file FreeBSD-141-UFS-sdc-DarkMatter.img 320,072,933,376 *100%* 80.31MB/s 1:03:20 (xfr#1, to-chk=0/1) rsync: [sender] read errors mapping

My CentOS 5.4 box has a single HBA card with 2 ports connected to my Storage. 2 Luns are assigned to my HBA card. Under /dev instead of seeing 4 devices I can see 12 devices from sdb to sdm. I am using qlogic driver that is bulitin to the OS. Has any one seen this kind of situation? Paras -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

There are times when a large file is copied up to 99% and then deleted after having received the error. Other times when the error occurs earlier and only a part of it is copied. Does it make sense to calculate the checksum if in both cases in output I don't have the same information that there is in input ? Because in the first case it is totally deleted and in the second case I have only a