similar to: BTRFS fsck ?

Hello, few days ago I returned from FreeBSD where I was using ZFS/GPT disks in raid-1 array back to (Arch)Linux and installed syslinux as bootloader for booting from single MBR disk. Now, after I finished with migration of my /home data, I'd like to deploy both of my 1TB disks using ext4 (btrfs is not stable enough) under LVM2 using raid-1 array & GPT by having all my partitions (/boot,

If this message comes through, then the Syslinux mailing list is functional again...

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4573 Summary: Hide/protect filtering of xattrs by name Product: rsync Version: 3.0.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: hashproduct+rsync@gmail.com

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4561 ------- Comment #1 from matt@mattmccutchen.net 2007-11-04 14:51 CST ------- Created an attachment (id=2960) --> (https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=2960&action=view) Implementation of --tweak options Here, finally, is an implementation of the --tweak options! Now that bug 5051 and the omission of mtimes from unchanged_attrs

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7120 Summary: Variable bandwidth limit .. bwlimit Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: pmdumuid at gmail.com

Hi there, I am newbie and recently started using btrfs. Now facing a weird problem. FWIW, I am on archlinux, kenel v3.8.0, having Btrfs v0.20-rc1. After an abnormal reboot, getting these errors while boot: systemd.fsck[289]: checking extents systemd.fsck[289]: checking fs roots systemd.fsck[289]: checking root refs systemd.fsck[289]: found 23728128 bytes used err is 0 systemd.fsck[289]: total

Hi, I thought that I would attempt a quick little patch that will make btrfsck into a No-op when called as fsck.btrfsck. The reasoning is that the FAQ states that it is recommended and safe to do so, and the current 12.04 version of Ubuntu just symlinks fsck.btrfsck to btrfsck instead of /bin/true. PS - Apologies if I mess this git send-email up! Dan McGrath (1): btrfs-progs: No-op when

Hi folks! Been using btrfs for quite a while now, worked great until now. Got power-loss on my machine and now i have the "parent transid verify failed on X wanted X found X" problem. So I can''t get it to mount. My btrfs is spread over sda (2tb), sdc(2tb), sdd(1tb). Is this something that an offline fsck could fix ? If so is the fsck-util being developed ? Is there a way to

Hi, I'm reading the tinc documentation [1], chapter 4 Configuration. I notice an apparent contradiction, and I wonder which part is correct. [1] http://tinc-vpn.org/documentation/tinc_4.html In part 4.3 "How connections work" this is stated: "If it [tinc] sees one or more ?ConnectTo? values pointing to other tinc daemons in that file, it will try to connect to those other

Add the new API btrfs-fsck to check the btrfs filesystem. Btrfs is currently under heavy development, and not suitable for any uses other than benchmarking and review. But it'll be useful in the near future. Signed-off-by: Wanlong Gao <gaowanlong at cn.fujitsu.com> --- daemon/btrfs.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++ generator/generator_actions.ml | 11 +++++++++++

Hi, How do I disable the imap listener in dovecot 2.0-beta-3? I only want to enable the imaps listener. In previous dovecot versions I could specify: prototols = imaps But in dovecot 2.0 this is no longer possible (imap and imaps are now both enabled with "protocols = imap"). I already made ssl a requirement with: ssl = required This is in the global section. I commented out the

You know, I was thinking: wouldn't it be nice to have RFC 4468 (Message Submission BURL Extension) support in dovecot? Maybe we should ask the guys from Apple to contribute some support for it, I have a gut feeling they would gladly do so ;) Kind regards -- Erik.

Hi, Are there init-scripts available for tinc? Kind regards, Erik.

Hi, I just set up tinc between two hosts (for now). All seems to work fine, but now I run in to a routing issue: I gave both of my vpn routers an IP in the 172.16.100.0/24 range, and used the Subnet-directive to inform tinc of this. This works fine, I can ping both hosts from both sides of the vpn. Ofcourse both vpn routers give access to other subnets, but they don't know the IP-ranges

Hi, In the past (2 months ago) : I have two AD Domain under Samba 4.1 : A and B. I war able to  connect a share in A from B. Now (after upgrade) : I have a W2016 domain (B) and a Samba 4.6 domain (A) but I can't connect a share in A from B. The user from B which try to connect the share in A has the same login in the two domains. So since the upgrade I don't have the same behavior

Hello, We have followed the migration from samba4.2 to samba4.6 from "http://samba.2283325.n4.nabble.com/Debian-Jessie-samba-4-5-8-2-4-5-10-4-6-5-available-td4719912.html" (van-belle) But we must put in smb.conf this instruction : "server role check:inhibit = yes". if not, nmbd fails to start. Why ? Regard

Heyho! (This is using btrfs from Debian''s 2.6.32 2.6.32-3-kirkwood kernel (-9 package; btrfs tools is v0.19-16-g075587c) A few observations about btrfsck: a btrfsck run on a 2T volume (4 disks) on a QNAP appliance (512M ram) got killed by Mr. OOM Killer. Initially, I was quite surprised. I''m only moderately surprised now since it might well be that I forgot to enable

I have accidently damaged the first block(s) of a btrfs partition and can''t mount it anymore. I can see that my data is still intact by running a command like: cat /dev/sda5 | hexdump -C | more Do any (experimental) tools exist which would allow me to recover the files? Thank you -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a

Hello. I am continuing my tests of BtrFS under a practical workload. Recently an incorrect poweroff (or maybe a small bug in BtrFS) caused a small data loss. The actual damage was non-existent. I used old branch, so maybe the relevant code is already improved. 1. Why btrfsck says "bad block" on that partition? What does it mean? My fist reaction was to use badblocks. It found no

Hello, I''m running a SLES10 SP1 Server as a Dom0 and as DomU. I have allocated 1024 Mb RAM to the DomU and one virtual processor (physical processor is a dual core Intel Xeon 3.4 Ghz). A warning is regularly displayed on the standard output : INIT: Id "x0" respawning too fast: disabled for 5 minutes Any idea where that come from ? Thanks in advance. Hervé Marcy