Displaying 20 results from an estimated 5000 matches similar to: "xfstests build and other questions/issues"
2013 Jul 01
1
[PATCH v2] xfstests: btrfs/316: cross-subvolume sparse copy
This testscript creates reflinks to files on different subvolumes,
overwrites the original files and reflinks, and moves reflinked files
between subvolumes.
Originally submitted as testcase 302, changes are made based on comments
from Eric: http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2013-03/msg00231.html
Two new common/rc functions used in this script (_require_cp_reflink and
_verify_reflink) have been
2013 Jun 10
1
btrfs-cleaner Blocked on xfstests 068
I''m running into a problem with the btrfs-cleaner thread becoming
blocked on xfstests 068.
The test locks up indefinitely without completing (normally it
finished in about 45 seconds on my test box).
I''ve replicated the issue on 3.10.0_rc5 and the for-linus branch of 3.9.0.
I ran a git bisect on the 3.9.0 for-linus branch, and tracked my issue
to the following commit:
commit
2003 Jan 03
1
Util for pop3 to dovecot?
What I want to do is pop my email off of a Pop3 server
and give it to dovecot for imap serving. Does anyone
know of a utility that will allow me to do this? I looked
at fetchmail but it seems to want to talk to an SMTP
server.
Thanks,
Brad
--
Brad Figg - brad at tpi.com 503.601.0235 ext. 105
TriplePoint, Inc. - http://www.tpi.com
2013 Jul 02
6
[PATCH v3] xfstests: btrfs/316: cross-subvolume sparse copy
This testscript creates reflinks to files on different subvolumes, overwrites the original files and reflinks, and moves reflinked files between subvolumes.
Originally submitted as testcase 302, changes are made based on comments from Eric: http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2013-03/msg00231.html
Two new common/rc functions used in this script (_require_cp_reflink and _verify_reflink) have been
2013 Jul 02
2
[PATCH] xfstests: make the scratch device for generic/256 slightly larger
This is similar to a previous fix I sent. 1 gig makes us do mixed file block
groups for btrfs, so these enospc tests will usually fail because we don''t have
space for metadata, which is the case for this test. So jack the size up to
1.5gig so that btrfs can do its normal thing and pass the test. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
---
tests/generic/256 |
2013 Jun 19
0
[PATCH] xfstests: add 'check -btrfs' support
Currently we can specify the testing filesytems like ''check -xfs'', but
btrfs is not support in this kind of command option. Add the option
''check -btrfs'' support.
Signed-off-by: Wang Sheng-Hui <shhuiw@gmail.com>
---
check | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/check b/check
index ff8fbcf..9c40615 100755
--- a/check
+++ b/check
@@
2013 Apr 21
4
[PATCH] xfstests: remove recursive include in filter.btrfs
Not sure how this happened, but filter.btrfs including
itself leads to immense sadness for any file that includes it.
(I got a segfault when I tried to run 307)
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
---
diff --git a/common/filter.btrfs b/common/filter.btrfs
index b1aa733..99d04a6 100644
--- a/common/filter.btrfs
+++ b/common/filter.btrfs
@@ -1,7 +1,5 @@
# Filters for btrfs
2003 Jan 06
1
Assert in imap-bodystructure.c
First let me thank you for my initial newby question about poping
from a pop3 server and delivering into my Dovecot maildir folders.
Now I'm getting an assertion in imap-bodystructure.c and one of
my imap folders is now inaccessable. I think the two are related.
Whenever I select the folder from my email client (kmail) I get
two log entries in the dovecot log of the format:
2003 Jan 23
3
e2fsck too old / ext3 HTREE errors
hi,
i have a tricky situation here and and don't know where to start with
the solution.
i happened to set up a linux system, but i had to install the base
system on another machine. i used e2fsprogs 1.30-WIP (30-Sep-2002) for
this.
now the machine is up and running, but i have to use e2fsprogs 1.27
(8-Mar-2002). it's a debian system and i wanted to stay sane & stable,
hence using
2013 May 20
1
[PATCH] xfstests: btrfs 308: regression test for btrfs send
I''m not sure how the numbering is supposed to work now that we''ve split
everything out so I''m just going with the next number in the directory. This is
a regression test for btrfs send, we had a problem where we''d try to send a file
that had been deleted in the source snapshot. This is just to make sure we
don''t have the same problem in the future.
2007 Feb 26
2
fs quota - what I am doing wrong?
Hi everyone,
on my server, i have quota set on /home partition (ext3). mount says:
root at zen:/var/log# mount |grep quo
/dev/sda8 on /home type ext3 (rw,noatime,usrquota)
/dev/sda7 on /tmp type ext3 (rw,noatime,usrquota,data=writeback)
System is debian/stable (distribution 2.6.8-3-686-smp kernel), quotas
are working:
root at zen:/var/log# quota ax
Disk quotas for user ax (uid 506):
2013 Oct 28
0
[PATCH] xfstests: add generic/320 to test fsync() on directories V2
Btrfs had some issues with fsync()''ing directories and fsync()''ing after
renames. These three new tests cover the 3 different issues we were seeing.
This breaks out the dmflakey stuff into a common helper to be shared between
generic/311 and generic/320. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
---
V1->V2: moved this out into its own test instead of
2013 May 03
3
[PATCH] xfstests: unmount scratch mnt in test 307
So if you have a mount command that doesn''t use /etc/mtab then it will spit out
a different device for the mounted device. So say we have
SCRATCH_DEV_POOL="/dev/sda /dev/sdb /dev/sdc"
we will turn this into
SCRATCH_DEV="/dev/sda"
SCRATCH_DEV_POOL="/dev/sdb /dev/sdc"
and then when you mkfs this you do _scratch_mkfs $SCRATCH_DEV_POOL which turns
into this
2014 Mar 13
1
Advanced Fat32 mount in /etc/fstab
Hi, my name is Steven.
I am trying to figure out the mount command to put into /etc/fstab;
Basically I want a FAT32 partition mounted,
but I want specific user/group ownership for a normal
user of the mountpoint and all directorys/files in it.
I currently have this in /etc/fstab:
/dev/sda8 /home/steven/sda8 vfat locale=en_US.utf8,windows_names,uid=500,gid=501,umask=0022,noatime 0 0
but i get
2013 Aug 16
2
[PATCH] xfstests: update filters and output of btrfs/006
The btrfs-progs tools changed the output:
- 100GiB instead of 100GB
- The number of spaces was changed
Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de>
---
common/filter | 2 +-
common/filter.btrfs | 3 ++-
tests/btrfs/006 | 6 +++---
tests/btrfs/006.out | 36 ++++++++++++++++++------------------
4 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git
2008 Feb 27
0
Error: Had a bootloader specified, but no disks are bootable
Hi,
I copied my root filesystem from one box to a harddisk partition /dev/sda8.
I started fdisk /dev/sda and added a bootable flag to partition 8.
Then I mounted /dev/sda8, chrooted into it, and ran a grub-install hd0.
Then I unmounted it, and tried to start the PVM host, but it ends short
after the try to start for the following reason:
xm create /etc/xen/vm/VM3 -c
Using config file
2014 Nov 11
0
kernel BUG at drivers/block/virtio_blk.c:172!
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 11:42 PM, Dongsu Park
<dongsu.park at profitbricks.com> wrote:
> Hi Ming,
>
> On 11.11.2014 08:56, Ming Lei wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 7:31 AM, Jens Axboe <axboe at kernel.dk> wrote:
>> > Known, I'm afraid, Ming is looking into it.
>
> Actually I had also tried to reproduce this bug, without success.
> But today I
2023 Jan 25
2
[PATCH 00/12] acl: remove remaining posix acl handlers
Hey everyone,
after we finished the introduction of the new posix acl api last cycle
we still left the generic POSIX ACL xattr handler around for two
reasons. First, because a few filesystems relied on the ->list() method
of the generic POSIX ACL xattr handlers in their ->listxattr() inode
operation. Second, during inode initalization in inode_init_always() the
registered xattr handlers in
2009 Mar 05
1
Strange Win Disk Size Info
Hi all,
I run Samba 3.0.28a-1ubuntu4.7 on a Ubuntu 8.04/x86_64 Xeon box. On
one huge XFS file system, I have several shares, which have XFS project
quotas applied. Looking at the file system info in Win (both 2k and
xp), I see a *very* strange size display (see screen shot).
Linux tells me about the folder hosting the share:
root@mybox:~# df -k
Filesystem 1K-blocks Used
2008 May 30
0
any idea what these messages mean?
I get these messages in my log file and have no idea what they are or
what they mean. Samba works fine on this system and others.
It only takes up useless space in the log file.
May 24 07:55:03 us12253 daemon:err|error smbd[1169060]: Initializing
DMAPI: AIX DMAPI(02/1997) 1.1
May 24 07:55:12 us12253 daemon:err|error smbd[1078876]: [2008/05/24
07:55:12, 0] smbd/dmapi.c:init_dmapi_service(71)
May