similar to: Samba 3.0.8pre2 Available for Download

Hallo, in 3.0.8pre2 the smbstatus command always shows connections _and_ shares even if using the switches '-p' for showing processes only or '-S' for showing shares only or '-B' for showing locks only: test2 # smbstatus --help Usage: [OPTION...] -p, --processes Show processes only -v, --verbose Be verbose -L, --locks

Hi list! (Thanks to Uli Iske for providing new schema file for nds.) I updated edirectory schema with new files on 3.0.8pre2. After that I could not change password for accounts just get -613 syntax violation. Before this (schema from 3.0.7) everything was working. I reverted attributes sambaLMPassword, sambaNTPassword, sambaPasswordHistory to versions without size limits, ike they were

I have a samba 3.0.8pre2 server in a "standalone server" mode which is replacing %D with the server's netbios name instead of workgroup. I tested this with a root preexec script and connecting to that share from a remote client in the same workgroup. Is this expected? Would %D only be replaced with the domain/workgroup name if the server were a PDC, BDC or domain member server?

What should be the filesystem permissions for the profile share? Something like 0700 user:group for the directory? I'm getting permission denied errors from winxp pro sp2 and samba 3.0.8pre2. Does it have something to do with "profile acls"?

Hello, I'm using samba as a Domain Controller, and i have the following question: It is possible to change an object's (file/dir) GROUP from Windows Explorer on a Samba server? I tried editing/changing via Security tab the unix-mapped Special Permission trio ($user, $group, Everybody) but it fails when I tried to save with the "Unable to save permission changes on <object>.

Greetings, I have been playing with 3.0.8rc2 on a test machine to get ready to upgrade my samba 2 PDC to Samba 3. I ran across an issue with mapping the domain admin group to a local UNIX group on the server and I wanted to know if the behavior I saw was normal or not. The Samba server is a Sun ultra 1 running Solaris 9, user and group information is kept in plain old

Hi, anybody knows, what the last entry in this log mean?: [2004/11/07 16:51:50, 3] smbd/reply.c:rename_internals(3777) rename_internals: case_sensitive = 0, case_preserve = 1, short case preserve = 1, directory = ./Neu Textdatei.txt, newname = ./???.txt, last_component_dest = ???.txt, is_8_3 = 0 [2004/11/07 16:51:50, 3] smbd/dosmode.c:unix_mode(111) unix_mode(./Neu Textdatei.txt) returning

Hi @all, backing up and verifying _printing_ databases uses 20-96% cpu and takes a long time (there are only few entries and smbd and nmbd were not running): for i in /var/lock/samba/?*.tdb /var/lock/samba/printing/?*.tdb /etc/?*.tdb do date echo $i.samba.bak rm -f $i.samba.bak tdbbackup -s .samba.bak $i

Greetings, I've a need to run 2 instances on one box. I've spent the better part of 2 days looking for docs and howto's and reading the FM. However, I think I'm making too much out of it, thinking that there is more to it than there really is. the first instance is to serve the users, the second instance is for the backup system. I'm running fedora core 2 with samba

Integrating SAMBA\WINBIND on AIX 4.3.3 with Microsoft Active Directory. Overview: This document is a roadmap on how you can integrate SAMBA with your Active Directory environment. This configuration will allow your Samba server to appear as a member of Active Directory. It will also allow your telnet sessions to use Active Directory for authentication. AIX Setup: Verify your system has

Hi all, I've noticed that since I started storing drivers in [print$] the printer name (as visible to Windows) changes to the driver name. I really want to suppress this behavior as I named the printers for clarity about where/what they are. Is there any way to suppress it? Using CUPS to share out the printers. Thanks, Misty

I've read the HOWTO and seen a zillion articles about moving from an NT PDC to a Samba PDC. Am having trouble tying this in to making the new Samba PDC act in the same file server capacity as the NT machine did. i.e., looking for info on copying the directories & files while preserving user & group permissions. Can someone point me to a guide(s) on this whole process? Also, in what

(those numbers are correct for 3.0.8pre2) 9.3.1 NetBIOS over TCP/IP it is _very_ good to mention here "netbios-node-type", but name resolution order described there (1..6) is not correct. actual order can depend on such things as: 1) netbios-node-type 2) "Enable LMHOSTS lookup" parameter --------------------------------------------------- 10.4.4 ldapsam "The NT

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 For anyone building Samba from source: I goofed a couple of small details in the 3.0.8 release. (a) the docs are the ones from 3.0.8pre2. The latest docs ~ build can be downloaded from ~ http://samba.org/~samba-bugs/docs/samba-docs-latest.tar.bz2 ~ Just unpack this archives and move the contents into ~ samba-3.0.8/docs/ (b) for some

Hi, samba 3.0.9 cannot expand %f anymore: Sending a netbios message to the samba server himself test2 # echo test | /usr/bin/smbclient -U 'eisfair Samba Server on TEST2' -M TEST2 -I 192.168.0.6 Connected. Type your message, ending it with a Control-D sent 6 bytes From smb.conf: message command = /bin/mail -s 'message from %f' root < %s; rm %s And this is the mail (see

Greetings, I have an advanced config question that I'm hoping the Samba Gods can help me with in regards to feasibility and execution. I'll give the concept of what I want to do, followed by the details of my present config. I have a functioning samba 3.0.8pre2 server that is multihomed. The 100Mb line is attached to our main network. the 1Gb line is attached to a private 1Gb lan