similar to: Issues with 3.6.6 as a PDC for Windows 7

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "Issues with 3.6.6 as a PDC for Windows 7"

2023 Mar 03
1
[PATCH v2 5/6] spec: Introduce NBD_FLAG_BLOCK_STATUS_PAYLOAD
On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 12:05:44PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 04:46:54PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: > > #### Simple reply message > > > > @@ -1232,6 +1235,19 @@ The field has the following format: > > will be faster than a regular write). Clients MUST NOT set the > > `NBD_CMD_FLAG_FAST_ZERO` request flag unless this transmission
2001 Sep 19
6
Winbind authentication
Hi everyone, First of all, could you please CC me, I am not (yet) subscribed to this list. Now my problem: I created a test setup at my office that uses winbind to authenticate linux users to a Windows NT server (they log in with DOMAIN+username), as described in the winbindd manpage. I followed their setup completely. (at my work I am using RedHat 7.1 and the winbindd daemon found in the
2019 Aug 23
1
Re: [PATCH 1/1] protocol: Add NBD_CMD_FLAG_FAST_ZERO
On 8/23/19 1:48 PM, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 09:34:26AM -0500, Eric Blake wrote: >> +- bit 4, `NBD_CMD_FLAG_FAST_ZERO`; valid during >> + `NBD_CMD_WRITE_ZEROES`. If set, but the server cannot perform the >> + write zeroes any faster than it would for an equivalent >> + `NBD_CMD_WRITE`, > > One way of fulfilling the letter of this
2016 Sep 26
0
Re: [Nbd] Testing NBD server implementations for correctness
On 26.09.2016 20:37, Alex Bligh wrote: >> On 26 Sep 2016, at 19:15, Wouter Verhelst <w@uter.be> wrote: >> >> TLDR: nbdkit is correct, nbd-tester-client is not, patches welcome. > I have pushed a fix. Thank you, you beat me to it by a few minutes. Will test ASAP. Regards, Carl-Daniel
2020 Feb 12
0
Re: Cross-project NBD extension proposal: NBD_INFO_INIT_STATE
On 2/12/20 1:27 AM, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 10:52:55PM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >> But anyway ... could a flag indicating that the whole image is sparse >> be useful, either as well as NBD_INIT_SPARSE or instead of it? You >> could use it to avoid an initial disk trim, which is something that >> mke2fs does: > >
2016 Sep 26
0
Re: [Nbd] Testing NBD server implementations for correctness
> On 26 Sep 2016, at 19:15, Wouter Verhelst <w@uter.be> wrote: > > TLDR: nbdkit is correct, nbd-tester-client is not, patches welcome. I have pushed a fix. -- Alex Bligh
2023 Mar 03
1
[PATCH v2 3/6] spec: Add NBD_OPT_EXTENDED_HEADERS
On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 11:49:18AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 04:46:52PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: > [...] > > @@ -1370,9 +1475,10 @@ of the newstyle negotiation. > > Return a list of `NBD_REP_META_CONTEXT` replies, one per context, > > followed by an `NBD_REP_ACK` or an error. > > > > - This option SHOULD NOT be
2020 Feb 12
1
Re: Cross-project NBD extension proposal: NBD_INFO_INIT_STATE
On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 06:09:11AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: > On 2/12/20 1:27 AM, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > >Hi, > > > >On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 10:52:55PM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > >>But anyway ... could a flag indicating that the whole image is sparse > >>be useful, either as well as NBD_INIT_SPARSE or instead of it? You > >>could use it to
2008 Nov 20
4
[Bug 18636] New: nouveau git does not run on NV34M
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18636 Summary: nouveau git does not run on NV34M Product: xorg Version: git Platform: PowerPC OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau AssignedTo: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org ReportedBy: wouter
2023 Mar 05
2
[PATCH v2 1/6] spec: Recommend cap on NBD_REPLY_TYPE_BLOCK_STATUS length
On Fri, Mar 03, 2023 at 04:17:40PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: > On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 10:32:01PM +0300, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote: > > s-o-b line missed. > > I'm not sure if the NBD project has a strict policy on including one, > but I don't mind adding it. I've never required it, mostly because it's something that I myself always forget, too, so,
2023 Mar 03
1
[PATCH v2 2/6] spec: Tweak description of maximum block size
On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 05:21:37PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > Hi Eric, > > Busy days, busy times. Sorry about the insane delays here. No problem; I've been tackling other things in the meantime too, so this extension has taken far longer than I planned for more reasons than just slow review time. > > On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 04:46:51PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: > >
2016 Sep 26
2
Re: [Nbd] Testing NBD server implementations for correctness
Hi, On 26.09.2016 09:53, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 03:22:52AM +0200, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: >> Running nbd-tester-client against nbdkit with oldstyle negotiation was fun. >> I managed to segfault nbdkit Side note: I'm going to try and get a backtrace from the nbdkit segfault and submit a bug report there. >> and noticed that
2005 Dec 21
1
how to sort records??
hey, ยต i have these records in my database, in a many-to-many relationship clients_users 1;66 2;66 3;66 5;66 6;66 7;66 8;66 14;66 15;66 16;66 17;66 18;66 19;66 20;66 21;66 22;66 clients 1;VME Complex Foster 2;VME Res. Canada 3;Twodecode 5;Index 6;Verleye bvba 7;Venus bvba 8;All Building Services nv 14;Vitro-Service sa 15;Vitro-Clean 16;Vecom nv 17;Ultra lean bvba 18;Solar Cleaning Services nv
2023 Mar 05
1
[PATCH] docs: Prefer 'cookie' over 'handle'
On Sat, Mar 04, 2023 at 10:03:46PM +0200, Nir Soffer wrote: > On Sat, Mar 4, 2023 at 12:15?AM Eric Blake <eblake at redhat.com> wrote: > > Makes no difference to implementations (other than older code > > still using 'handle' may be slightly harder to tie back to the spec). > > To avoid confusion with older code that carefully used "handle" to match
2003 Jun 16
3
crash on LIST command
Hello, I'm experiencing a reproducable crash in the imap daemon of dovecot 0.99.9.1 when running the next commands (sniffed from a sylpheed session): [cocaine:~] telnet ice 143 Trying 192.168.196.1... Connected to ice. Escape character is '^]'. * OK dovecot ready. 1 NOOP 1 OK NOOP completed. 2 LOGIN wouter password 2 OK Logged in. 3 NAMESPACE 3 BAD Error in IMAP command: Unknown
2004 Jul 12
1
dovecot-1.0-test27 crash on FETCH
Hello, I've got a crash with -test27 on a FETCH, just after logging in. Attached are the mailbox (1 message only), logs, sniffed session, testcase and core dump backtrace. If the dovecot.conf is needed, just ask (it's pretty much the default configuration). Maybe this has just been fixed in -test28, in which case you can just delete this email. :) Btw, it's rather irrelevant, but
2001 Dec 10
1
Font problem with delphi application
Hi all, I am having a problem with a small Delphi address database application. When attempting to display the address details from one of a list of addresses, an empty text area is displayed instead of a text area containing address details. Screenshots of the app in windows and wine can be found here: http://www.blub.net/~wouter/wine/windows.png http://www.blub.net/~wouter/wine/wine.png The
2012 Mar 12
0
Dovecot LDA breaking .qmail forwarding?
Good morning all, I've a problem, I'm using the Dovecot LDA in my .qmail file: |/var/qmail/bin/preline -f /usr/local/libexec/dovecot/deliver -d $EXT@$USER However when I add a forward, such as: |/var/qmail/bin/preline -f /usr/local/libexec/dovecot/deliver -d $EXT@$USER <mailto:&wouter at vdschagt.com> &wouter at vdschagt.com The mail isn't forwarded
2004 Dec 27
0
Ingress question with sub classes
Hi, I wanted to configure the following : 1. VPN + some other special connections (TCP 82,8282,23,22 and ICMP) to have priority over the rest 2. special upstream for our updating system on port 4000 3. within the VPN tunnels citrix traffic ( TCP 1494, 2598) + icmp has priority I need this for both incoming and outgoing traffic as it is the bandwith managment config on a central system from
2016 Sep 26
2
Re: [Nbd] Testing NBD server implementations for correctness
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 11:43:42AM +0100, Alex Bligh wrote: > > > On 26 Sep 2016, at 10:21, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net> wrote: > > > > Wow, that was quick! Thank you. > > > > I stumbled upon another problem: Apparently nbd-tester-client and nbdkit > > disagree on what constitutes a valid flush request. > >