similar to: Asterisk

Hi, Please help me understand the following applications and what are its advantages if we compare between each of them. Asterisk, FreeSWITCH, TrixBox, SER, OpenSER, sipX, CallWeaver, and YATE. Regards, Kaushal -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20120103/ffad2be6/attachment.htm>

Please note that we are available to fix the current REMOTE crash that affects Asterisk/openpbx/trixbox and crashes these systems via a malformed packet please contacts use if you need a hand to patch your systems. -- Mike Sales Manager http://www.voicemeup.com Making it happen 1.877.807.VOIP (8647) 1.514.312.7030 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Ok here is a real geek question, I building my own linux kernel for my asterisk system and came across the kernel setting for the timer frequency. I have one of 3 hardcode choices 100Hz, 250 Hz and 1000Hz. From what I understand the default Freq was changed from 100Hz in kernel 2.4 to 1000Hz (1KHz) in kernel 2.6. Timing is a BIG issue in asterisk with all the TDM and zap channel stuff.

at http://wiki.openpbx.org/tiki-index.php?page=Easy+route+to+building+OpenPBX.org there is the following adduser command: adduser --no-create-home --ingroup openpbx --disabled-password --disabled-login openpbx This does NOT seem to be the right format for Centos. So far, using man, I have come up with; adduser -M -g openpbx What else do I need?

Hi, all I am building a new server. Have installed FC 6 and put in TDM400 card. Checked out latest asteriusk code, run make install in zaptel directory. So far all is fine. Now I am trying to install the drivers. # modprobe zaptel FATAL: Module zaptel not found. Fair enough, no zaptel driver is found on the system. Is there are any known problems with FC6? I did not have much trouble running

Hi, I am looking for a very low cost way of receiving and sending T38 fax reliably. Is there any possible solution using Asterisk as the PSTN SIP gateay and Digium E1/T1 card? Is there other open source package that can help to accomplish this purpose? Regards, Mark -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Dear All, I was wondering will there be any problems or changes that I will need to do to compile the current Asterisk(1.2.7)/Zaptel(1.2.5)/Libpri(1.2.2) source from www.asterisk.org into a 64-bit binaries? I am currently using the following hardware for my new server. CPU: Pentium D 930 3.0 GHz Mobo: Intel D945PSN Motherboard RAM: 512MB 533MHz DDR-2 Drive: SATA II Seagate 160GB Card: TE406

Hi All, I have a telephony project for which I need to build a prototype to demo for management. The prototype must work on a GSM phone network. In the demo system, a call from GSM phone comes into the demo box. The demo box runs CallWeaver. Callweaver picks up the GSM call, answers it and plays a sould file, then dials out to a second GSM phone somewhere and connects them so they talk. My

Hello, What do you think of this project www.openpbx.org ? Something like ser and openser ! Kinds Regards Harry ___________________________________________________________________________ Appel audio GRATUIT partout dans le monde avec le nouveau Yahoo! Messenger T?l?chargez cette version sur http://fr.messenger.yahoo.com

1.2? 1.4? 1.6? 1.8? Thanks, - Doug Mortensen Network Consultant Impala Networks Inc CCNA, MCSA, Security+, A+ Linux+, Network+, Server+ . www.impalanetworks.com P: (505) 327-7300 F: (505) 327-7545

Hello ! I 'm trying T.38 faxig with spandsp using rxfax/txfax as fax terminal. As another endpoint I 'm using Grandstream HT 486 ATA and a fax machine. Has anybody success with the HT486 as T.38 terminal ? ATA as originator: I managed only onetimes a successfull T.38 fax session. The other times the HT486 did not initiate a re-invite with T.38 parameters. Or shall the Terminator

I understand that Asterisk 1.4 should support T.38 pass-through, but I need Asterisk (or something on the Asterisk box) to act as a T.38 endpoint. Judging from the unclaimed $12,000USD bounty, it doesn't appear that Asterisk itself can do this. http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+T.38+Bounty Does anyone have any experience with this, or are able to point to an example of this working?

Fax over T38 is failing, on the same system it worked with Callweaver. What do I need to post to be get further assistance please?

Hi list, I'm evaluating a private telephony scenario of about 20 locations - 300 phones, 50 FAX machines. Initial overview points to the installation of asterisk at three locations connected to the PSTN via ISDN PRI. All other locations, small by themselves, would get SIP phones managed by asterisk, since there is good IP connectivity between all sites. Now on to the

Hi, Do you have any example showing how to use SendFAX ? I can see several examples of ReceiveFAX but not a single one showing SendFAX. Regards -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20081127/b41ca08b/attachment.htm

Hi, I am using Asterisk for a call center on a Dual Xeon machine.. I currently have 109 active channels 53 active calls Every body is complaining about quality and cpu is around 80% idle. Is there any tuning I can do??? Besides that, Asterisk normally goes down once or twice per day... Thank you Dov -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

I just installed the Rawhide package on my CentOS 5 system. The one item that bit me is that the config file defaults to using interface "[::]" so it only listens on IPv6. (This is from a patch in the package that changes the upstream default of "*", so it only affects those using the Fedora package.) For those wanting to track the issue, here's the Bugzilla:

Is there a straightforward way to disallow the deletion of all IMAP mailboxes? I have a user who's deleted an important IMAP mailbox and I'm now recovering a recent copy from the backup. But I'd rather just blanket disallow all folder deletions. The user is using Thunderbird and this has happened more than once so I suspect Tbird is willing to let a folder get deleted too easily.

This is slightly OT in that it isn't specifically *-related, but I was wondering what the members of the * user community felt about these two subjects. I've been perusing the OpenPBX.org mail list and the current hot topic is the fact that their project has come to a grinding halt. They are concerned that they don't have enough people working on their project. They feel that * has

-----Original message----- > From:H <agents at meddatainc.com> > Sent: Monday 3rd September 2018 14:52 > To: Centos Mailing List <centos at centos.org> > Subject: [CentOS] Centos on Dell XPS15 > > Is anyone successfully running Centos 7 on a Dell XPS15? If so, which model? If not, what was the problem? > > Thank you! I only ran Fedora 28 Workstation Live from