similar to: sanlockd, virtlock and GFS2

Hi, I'm trying to build an active/active virtualization cluster using a Ceph RBD as backing for each libvirt-managed LXC. I know live migration for LXC isn't yet possible, but I'd like to build my infrastructure as if it were. That is, I would like to be sure proper locking is in place for live migrations to someday take place. In other words, I'm building things as if I were

On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 05:47:35PM -0500, Joshua Dotson wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to build an active/active virtualization cluster using a Ceph > RBD as backing for each libvirt-managed LXC. I know live migration for LXC > isn't yet possible, but I'd like to build my infrastructure as if it were. > That is, I would like to be sure proper locking is in place for

Hi all, I have a 2 node cluster that consists of the following: * 1 drbd/gfs2 partition that holds VM images and XML * Sanlock configured with the disk lease directory on the same drbd/gfs partition Everything is working well, aside from one small issue I ran into. When testing fencing, on one particular test GFS began replaying the journal for the remaining node, and in the middle of it

On Fri, Jan 03, 2020 at 02:56:50PM +0100, Gionatan Danti wrote: > Il 03-01-2020 11:26 Daniel P. Berrangé ha scritto: > > virtlockd also uses fcntl(), however, it doesn't have to acquire locks > > on > > the file/block device directly. It can use a look-aside file for > > locking. > > For example a path under /var/lib/libvirt/lock. This means that locks on >

On Sat, Dec 28, 2019 at 02:36:27PM +0100, Gionatan Danti wrote: > Il 28-12-2019 01:39 Gionatan Danti ha scritto: > > Hi list, > > I would like to ask a clarification about how locking works. My test > > system is CentOS 7.7 with libvirt-4.5.0-23.el7_7.1.x86_64 > > > > Is was understanding that, by default, libvirt does not use any locks. > > From here [1]:

Dear All, I am trying to use VM (disk) locking on a two node Centos 7 KVM cluster. Unfortunately, I am not successful. Using virtlockd (https://libvirt.org/locking-lockd.html), I get each host to write the zero length file with a hashed filename to the shared folder specified. Regardless of which host I start a VM (domain) on, they do produce the identical filename per VM. What does not work,

Hi, I've read in the documentation that virtlockd uses SIGUSR1 to dump its state and then re-execs itself. Now I tried it and this seems to fail because virtlockd is being launched without a full path (when using the init script), thus re-exec fails with the error: error : virLockDaemonPreExecRestart:1092 : Unable to restart self: No such file or directory Changing in the init script

Il 06-01-2020 10:06 Peter Krempa ha scritto: > On Fri, Jan 03, 2020 at 14:08:03 +0000, Daniel Berrange wrote: >> As above, QEMU's locking is good enough to rely on for file based >> images. Hi Daniel, thank you for the direct confirmation. >> The flaws I mention with libvirt might actually finally be something >> we >> have fixed in 5.10.0 with QEMU 4.2.0,

On Wed, 12 Feb 2014 21:51:53 +0100 urgrue <urgrue@bulbous.org> wrote: > I'm trying to set up SAN-based shared storage in KVM, key word being > "shared" across multiple KVM servers for a) live migration and b) > clustering purposes. But it's surprisingly sparsely documented. For > starters, what type of pool should I be using? It's indeed not documented

Dear colleagues, I am facing a problem that has been troubling me for last week and a half. Please if you are able to help or offer some guidance. I have a non-prod POC environment with 2 CentOS7 fully updated hypervisors and an NFS filer that serves as a VM image storage. The overall environment works exceptionally well. However, starting a few weeks ago I have been trying to implement virtlock

[moderator note: .pngs were stripped to avoid overwhelming the mail server and list recipients with 1M of data] -------- Forwarded Message -------- Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 11:25:09 +0200 Message-ID: <20160330112509.Horde.0Oad-ZfkzdZnouXf-VkEmw1@webmailperso.univ-brest.fr> From: villeneu@kassis.univ-brest.fr To: Franky Van Liedekerke <liedekef@telenet.be> Cc: libvirt-users@redhat.com

Hi Eric, Here is my try to write a quick upstart script for virtlockd. It should be named /etc/init/virtlockd.conf, then : ln -s /lib/init/upstart-job /etc/init.d/virtlockd It seems to work for me : # virtlockd - Locking daemon for libvirt description "virtlockd" start on filesystem and runlevel [2345] stop on starting rc RUNLEVEL=[016] pre-start script test -x

Hi list, I would like to ask a clarification about how locking works. My test system is CentOS 7.7 with libvirt-4.5.0-23.el7_7.1.x86_64 Is was understanding that, by default, libvirt does not use any locks. From here [1]: "The out of the box configuration, however, currently uses the nop lock manager plugin". As "lock_manager" is commented in my qemu.conf file, I was

Hello, I configured libvirtd with the sanlock lock manager plugin: # rpm -qa | egrep "libvirt-0|sanlock-[01]" libvirt-lock-sanlock-0.9.4-23.el6_2.4.x86_64 sanlock-1.8-2.el6.x86_64 libvirt-0.9.4-23.el6_2.4.x86_64 # egrep -v "^#|^$" /etc/libvirt/qemu-sanlock.conf auto_disk_leases = 1 disk_lease_dir = "/var/lib/libvirt/sanlock" host_id = 4 # mount | grep sanlock

Hi all, Trying to test libvirt 1.1.3 with virtlockd locking my qcow2 images on a NFS storage between two kvm hosts. ./configure ... --with-init-script=upstart Libvirtd upstart script is actually well generated but I can't see nothing about virtlockd... or am I blind ? :) Nevertheless, running virtlockd -d && service libvirtd restart works fine. Am I wrong thinking that editing

I'm trying to set up SAN-based shared storage in KVM, key word being "shared" across multiple KVM servers for a) live migration and b) clustering purposes. But it's surprisingly sparsely documented. For starters, what type of pool should I be using?

On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 09:08:58AM -0700, Eric Blake wrote: > On 11/07/2013 09:04 AM, NEVEU Stephane wrote: > > Eric, > > [please don't top-post on technical lists] > > > > > Well, in case where several servers may start the same virtual machines after a reboot for exemple. > > http://lists.ceph.com/pipermail/ceph-users-ceph.com/2013-August/003887.html

Il 03-01-2020 11:26 Daniel P. Berrangé ha scritto: > virtlockd also uses fcntl(), however, it doesn't have to acquire locks > on > the file/block device directly. It can use a look-aside file for > locking. > For example a path under /var/lib/libvirt/lock. This means that locks > on > block devices for /dev/sda1 would be held as >

Eric, Well, in case where several servers may start the same virtual machines after a reboot for exemple. http://lists.ceph.com/pipermail/ceph-users-ceph.com/2013-August/003887.html I've seen this hook here : http://www.wogri.at/en/linux/ceph-libvirt-locking/ But it's a hook... Yes, I may try to write a patch. My coding skills are surely not as good as yours but I 'd be glad to make

Il 28-12-2019 01:39 Gionatan Danti ha scritto: > Hi list, > I would like to ask a clarification about how locking works. My test > system is CentOS 7.7 with libvirt-4.5.0-23.el7_7.1.x86_64 > > Is was understanding that, by default, libvirt does not use any locks. > From here [1]: "The out of the box configuration, however, currently > uses the nop lock manager