similar to: [Bug 514] Making DNAT --to-destination resolve service named of port

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=514 Summary: Making DNAT --to-destination resolve service named of port Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.6.x Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: ip_tables (kernel)

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=514 Phil Oester <netfilter at linuxace.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|laforge at netfilter.org |netfilter-buglog at lists.netf | |ilter.org -- Configure

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1428 Bug ID: 1428 Summary: Unable to dnat to port without defining destination address in inet table Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component:

On September 5, Tom wrote: > In Shorewall 4.2, you can leave the ''loc:'' out of the DNAT- rule. I tried that just now (shorewall-perl 4.2.1), and I got an error: Checking... WARNING: Destination zone (172.29.0.29) ignored : /etc/shorewall/rules (line 38) ERROR: Unknown Host (0.0.0.0/0) : /etc/shorewall/rules (line 38) where 172.29.0.29 is the destination address on

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=850 Summary: DNAT applied even after deleting the IP Tables DNAT Rule Product: iptables Version: 1.4.x Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 Component: iptables AssignedTo: netfilter-buglog at

Hi all, net : internet zone dmz : DMZ zone Lan : local network zone in 1.4.6c this rule : DNAT all lan:10.0.0.1 tcp http - 192.0.0.1 does generate the following iptables rules in nat table : Chain OUTPOUT DNAT tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 192.0.0.1 tcp dpt:http to:10.0.0.1 Chain net_dnat DNAT tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 192.0.0.1 tcp dpt:http to:10.0.0.1 Chain dmz_dnat

I have been trying to get DNAT to work and I actually have succeeded too, however, not how I thought it would work when reading through the documentation. 1. No matter what I do I cannot get DNAT to work unless I have an entry in eiter the nat or the proxyarp file. Is that really how it''s supposed to be? I can''t find anything about it in the documentation. 2. Also, in the

Hi, The private adresses (192.168.254.0/255.255.255.0) of my network are sent dynamically by dhcp on my network. The dhcp server is on the firewall which address is 192.168.254.1/255.255.255.255 (this address is static). I''ve got a rsync server on this network which is on a separe server. His address is 192.168.254.200/255.255.255.255 (this address is static). I want that the users

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=471 Summary: UDP stream DNAT problem Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.6.x Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: NAT AssignedTo: laforge@netfilter.org ReportedBy:

Hi, i''m a shorewall users and i have the following problem: I have one class C range of IP''s and i have three zones (net, dmz , loc) I need create one rule to dnat one valid ip address (but not in use in one computer) to one invalid host in my loc zone. How i do? I try this: DNAT net:200.200.200.200 dmz:200.193.137.38 tcp 137,138,139,445 -

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1423 Bug ID: 1423 Summary: iptables-translate silently discards --ctstate DNAT Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: iptables over nftable

Hi, after kernel upgrade to 2.4.23 my existing configuration of shorewal 1.4.8 will not start / it fail on DNAT and/or masq with message: "iptables: Invalid argument" / I founded some similar problems description - see links bellow, but there is no solution how to get work shorewall with DNAT and masq with 2.4.23 kernel. http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0312.0/0268.html

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=452 Summary: DNAT to internal network don't work with source routing and 2 uplinks Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.6.x Platform: i386 OS/Version: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

I need to access externally (via Internet) one device in internal network which has no default gateway configured. As the device doesn''t have default gateway, the response to SYN (ie, SYN/ACK) don''t come back to Internet. What I need is a setup to make this connection appears to come from firewall''s internal IP address instead of the public IP of originating requester

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1056 Bug ID: 1056 Summary: nft: Syntax error with dnat as ct state Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: nft Assignee: pablo at netfilter.org

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1160 Bug ID: 1160 Summary: dnat ip address not shown in nft list output when using port value Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Fedora Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: nft

Howdy, I have a strange issue, first some back story, I failed to upgrade from Debian 6.0 to 7.0 and had to do a fresh install of 7.0 I had a few PV''s and a Windows 7 VM on this system. they still work for the most part for the router I have the following issue that I am not able to reproduce on the other PV''s root@router:/home/kd5lct# iptables --list libkmod: ERROR

I have a pretty straightforward shorewall (v 2.0.12) setup in my Phoenix office. IP addresses on the firewall eth0 172.16.10.249 eth1 12.47.198.100 eth1:1 12.47.198.108 eth1:2 12.47.198.101 eth2 172.16.11.249 interfaces: loc eth0 detect net eth1 detect blacklist dmz eth2 detect vpn1 tun1 192.168.124.255 zones net Net

Hi All, I use rather old Shorewall 3.2.6 and I know it''s no longer supported. I haven''t been updating the software because it works as intended until now. The problem is a simple DNAT rule. I actually have around 8 DNAT rules and they all work just fine. Here is what I want to achieve. I have a SMTP server in my LAN (lets say address 192.168.1.10). The SMTP daemon listens on

Hi This is an odd question. But here it is. I have two hosts both with two nicks physically in two different countries. One host I have DNAT set up on such that all traffic is forwarded to the second host. iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -d 0.0.0.0 -j DNAT --to-destination second_host_ip But what I am trying to imagine is how can I get the second host to un-DNAT the traffic from the