similar to: Accessing mail files not owned by imap login user

hey friends, I have installed sendmail or it would rather say it comes default with the centos. I am using Centos4.0 and I am trying to configure sendmail with virtual users. I have created few users for my domain. My internal domain (example.com) is different from my isp domain (example1.com). The problem I am facing is that if the user1 at example1.com sends the mail to the user2 at

Hy! I am currently configuring a new mailserver using postfix and dovecot 1.2.1. The filesystem strucutre in my spool directory is user1/ user2/ domain/info/ domain/office/ user1 and unser2 are ordinary users mailboxes, the latter two contain the virtual mailboxes for info at domain and office at domain as created by postfix. I want these virtual mailboxes (all of them are in maildir format) to

Hi, Since updating to 2.3.1 on my FreeBSD mailserver mail delivery using lda is broken if I have sieve enabled. (Before updating this was 2.2 and pigeonhole 0.4) FreeBSD 11.1-p8 amd64 Dovecot 2.3.1 Pigeonhole 0.5.1 Mailflow is OpenSMTPd as MTA, using mda delivery to rspamc which utlimately delivers using dovecot-lda. smtpd.conf deliver to mda "rspamc -h scan --mime -e

Hi Here is my environment: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.7 (Tikanga) postfix-2.9.1-1.rhel5 dovecot 1.0.7 I want to config a complete postfix-dovecot mail server. First I configured postfix to use procmail, its default LDA and dovecot for pop3 and imap. I didn't changed main.cf a lot, just myhostname and a few other properties. I didn't set home_mailbox. About dovecot.conf

Would it be sensible/"cost effective" to make dovecot-deliver generated X-Delivered-To header(s) based on command line parameter(s)? [after striping such existing headers, before consulting sieve] I need it to: a) *clearly* mark POP/IMAP account fetched by fetchmail [with fetchmail using directly dovecot-deliver in --mda option] b) cleanly implement "shared mailboxes" with

Hi, Is this expected or not? From: user1 at fuga.example.com <user1 at example.com> To: user2 at hoge.example.com <user2 at example.com> ? a uid fetch 43055 (envelope) * 1860 FETCH (UID 43055 ENVELOPE ("Thu, 30 Jul 2020 13:52:59 +0900" "test1" ((NIL NIL "user1" "fuga.example.com")) ((NIL NIL "user1" "fuga.example.com"))

I have a dataset like this (dput for this below) which represents user computer sessions: username machine start end 1 user1 D5599.domain.com 2011-01-03 09:44:18 2011-01-03 09:47:27 2 user1 D5599.domain.com 2011-01-03 09:46:29 2011-01-03 10:09:16 3 user1 D5599.domain.com 2011-01-03 14:07:36 2011-01-03 14:56:17 4 user1 D5599.domain.com

Hello, I have logging information for multiple machines, which I am trying to summarize and graph. So far, I process each host individually, but I would like to summarize the user count across multiple hosts. I want to answer the question "how many unique users logged in on a certain day across a group of machines"? I'm not quite sure how to scale the data frame and analysis to

Try as I may, I cannot get Dovecot to allow anything but blank passwords listed in a custom file I made for the purpose. It will not recognise anybody in passwd. Only using POP3 on an internal network so little danger of incursions. Once I created a password file with user names and no password, one user could login (from Outlook 2003) but another could not. Telnet test also fails to

I have a great understanding problem about acls and share-definitions. I use Samba 3.0.1pre3, compiled with acl-support, everything works fine, ACL's can be set with Windows XP File-Manager and the getfacl shows that it is OK. My Problem ist that I dont know how to define a share for acls. For example, here is my share [user1] Path=/lanman/user1 Valid users=user1,@root Force user=user1 Read

On Tue, 1 Sep, 2020 at 09:59, Timo Sirainen <timo at sirainen.com> wrote: > On 1. Sep 2020, at 6.24, TACHIBANA Masashi <tachibana at qualitia.co.jp> > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Is this expected or not? >> >> From: user1 at fuga.example.com <user1 at example.com> >> To: user2 at hoge.example.com <user2 at example.com> >>

Hello I noticed a small bug in the way my extensions.conf work: Users can choose extensions 1-4 or 9 to tell why they're calling, and I'll send an e-mail to the person(s) to whom is involved. Extension 4 is actually for personal messages for User1, and extension 9 is for everyone (User1, User2, and User3). => For some reason, when the caller chooses extension 4, both User1 and User2

Hello, I have been doing a lot of research on this subject and I'm not finding a clear answer. My company currently makes a video capture and transcoding application that runs on a Linux server. The video application mounts shares from a second Linux storage server for various users at the same time. In other words, we have: A Linux Storage Server with many accounts (for example,

Hi all, I do have a mailbox-quota problem in dovecot 2.0.19 that is beond my understanding. Could someone pls. give me a hint. - user1 max. mailbox quota is set to 1GB, the current mailbox size of user1 is 15MB - user2 max. mailbox quota is set to 10MB, the current mailbox size of user1 is 10kB - user1 shares the folder 'shared_folder' to user2 with all rights (read, write ...) -

Dear, I have a working Samba 3.5.6 running on one of my servers onto which (existing) users can successfully log on. Recently, I needed to add some projects and some users but I cannot succeed in letting these new users access the shares. The smb.conf file is very small and I had only 4 users until now. In the following smb.conf, projA_dirs is only accessed by user1, while projB_dirs is the new

Hi, I sent you an email but now when I read it again, it looks like there were some mistakes in it... Please ignore that and address only the following message: Hi, I don't know if this is the right place to ask, but I really couldn't find it anywhere on the web and if you could only provide me with a quick hint, it would be really helpful! I'm experiencing the following problem

PBX: Asterisk 1.4 Phones: PSTN phone connected to TDM400 X-Ten Lite Polycom 430 Scenario Polycom 430 = User1 User2 calls User1(Polycom 430) asks to be transfered to User3 User1 does an attended transfer using the trnsfr button on the polycom User2 is placed in music-on-hold User3s phone rings. (So far so good Right?) User3 picks up the phone to answer User2 only to

On 02/06/2017 11:48, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Mon, 6 Feb 2017 11:11:09 +0200 > Alnis Morics via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Thank you, Rowland, for the reply. >> > >> And the nss tests as per Wiki seem to pass: >> > >> >> # getent passwd Administrator >>

Hey list, I have a problem when I host 2 SIP-accounts on the same Asterisk-server. Asterisk picks out the SIP-account on alphabetic order A --> Z. In my sip.conf : register => user1:passwd1 at server/user1 register => user2:passwd2 at server/user2 [YOCAN-3starsnet] type=peer host=server username=user1 secret=passwd1 fromuser=user1 accountcode=user1_in [ITCENTER-3starsnet] type=peer

Hi, I think I found a bug in Dovecot 2.1.17 and 2.2.13. In our setup, sometimes ACLs stop working because "dovecot-acl-list" is replaced by an empty file. We found that lazy_expunge is connected to this. To reproduce, create ACLs for "user1" in a folder. Put a mail in that folder and expunge it, so that the folder will be created in the "expunged" namespace.