similar to: command not found error

Dear All, After installing Shorewall, on a router with 4 NIC, seems running ok. Next day, when connecting from clients, (MS) we keep getting ip conflict for non-conflicting ip addresses. Any help is appreciated. Detals of Startup: + shift + nolock= + ''['' 1 -gt 1 '']'' + trap ''my_mutex_off; exit 2'' 1 2 3 4 5 6 9 + command=start +

Hello all, Yesterday I noticed that my system was "leaking" traffic towards the 10/8 network, I have shorewall installed on multiple machines ranging from single interface devices to ones with 10+ interfaces. I tested all the boxes and they are showing the same behavior. All systems are CentOS 3.4, 2.4.21-27.0.2.ELsmp. Shorewall version: 2.2.1 For the host mentioned is a single

Hi list, thank you for Shorewall :) I''m trying to get a simple config to work but i can''t seem to work out how to gain access via ssh to the protected remote machine. But that doesn''t surprise me really as i have just spend well over an hour to find how to limit the lograte AND fill in the logburst in shorewall.conf. I have specified a logfile (not messages) in

Hi, I''m trying to enable ssh (when that works, want to add:pop3s,smtp,web) from the internet to the firewall but it does not work. I managed to DNAT ftp to a host in the loc network (192.168.0.50) successful but I don''t know why SSH: Does not work for me: ACCEPT net fw tcp 22 Works from the loc network: ACCEPT loc fw tcp 22 I have tried also with (no success): AllowSSH

This is a minor release of Shorewall. WARNING: This release introduces incompatibilities with prior releases. See http://www.shorewall.net/upgrade_issues.htm. Changes are: a) There is now a new NONE policy specifiable in /etc/shorewall/policy. This policy will cause Shorewall to assume that there will never be any traffic between the source and destination zones. b) Shorewall no longer

Let''s move this to the Shorewall Development list.... On Tuesday 10 February 2004 03:14 pm, xavier wrote: > here is a patch to allow this : > |ACCEPT<10/sec:20>:debug fw lan:$ntp_servers udp 123 - - - - ntp > > a problem with the patch is that now the logprefix is mandatory. > i''m trying to debug it, but i can''t find the flaw. Also, with

Hi everybody. I''m sorry to bother you because I''m probably doing something wrong, but I have already read the documentation and I have been using shorewall for quite a long time. I recently installed 3.2.3 from source (but there was the same problem with 3.0.7 from apt-get ... -t unstable) The thing is, that I can''t get masq working. Maybe this is because

Good day, I have gone through a couple of the HOWTO''s on how to get this to work, but I am still sitting with a very strange (for me) issue. If two clients connect via OpenVPN (bridged), they can access each other without any problems, but neither of them can access the server, nor any system behind it. I am fairly sure it is a Shorewall issue, but I am very new to Shorewall, having

Shorewall can run without openvpn, but you need it if you want to establish private networks through public structures. -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: info@kws-netzwerke.de [mailto:info@kws-netzwerke.de] Gesendet: Freitag, 30. Juni 2006 12:52 An: 'Shorewall Users' Betreff: AW: [Shorewall-users] OpenVPN question Shorewall is able to work with openvpn but it isn´t a bundle of a

Hello, I am new to non-linear growth modelling in R and I am trying to reproduce an analysis that was done (successfully) in S-Plus. I have a simple non-linear growth model, with no nesting. I have attempted to simplify the call as much as possible (by creating another grouped object, instead of using subset= and compacting the fixed and random expressions.) This is a what the grouped

Hi All, As you probably all know :-) I''m trying to do the multi-isp thing. I''ve resolved my last issue with the route_rules as suggested by Tom and Jerry suggested. Lately I have been seeing "transient" (I say transient because the problem will persist for a while and then magically clear itself up some number of minutes later) situations where my gateway will log:

I''ve just put in production a Linux firewall with 4 ethernet interfaces and 3 openvpn tun virtual interfaces. With Shorewall everything work like a charm (only a little hassle with some details, due to bad configuration, not bugs!) Great tool! Tom and other Shorewall developers, you all are great! Bye (and sorry for my bad english) -- Paolo Basenghi - Centro elaborazione dati

I think you can change the existing firewall logging code for log_rule_limit (where you have one case for for LOGRULENUMBERS and another almost identical case without) down to this slightly shorter version with no duplication (excerpt): if [ -n "$LOGRULENUMBERS" ]; then eval rulenum=\$${chain}_logrules [ -z "$rulenum" ] && rulenum=1 fi case

When I install the two-interfaces files in /etc/shorewall on my FC-5 system (with shorewall-3.2.3) and run "services shorewall restart" I get ------------------------------------------------------ cp -a interfaces masq policy routestopped rules zones /etc/shorewall/ ... [root@alfred shorewall]# service shorewall restart ... Determining Zones... ERROR: Zone fw is defined more than once

I have a server, server A, with three NICs: two to the Internet via separate ADSL modems, and one to the LAN. The two ''net'' interfaces are configured as described at http://www.shorewall.net/MultiISP.html. This has been working for a number of months. I am now testing an OpenVPN link between server A and another (currently single-ISP) server (server B). I can establish the VPN

Shorewall have OpenVPN itself or need install OpenVPN for Shorewall to run ? Thank _______________________________________ YM - 離線訊息 就算你沒有上網，你的朋友仍可以留下訊息給你，當你上網時就能立即看到，任何說話都冇走失。 http://messenger.yahoo.com.hk Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere

Hello, I want set the accounting function for web traffic, when I use shorewall show web it can''t show anything. accounting file: GROUP web:COUNT - eth1 eth0 tcp 80 80 web:COUNT - eth0 eth1 tcp 80 80 Thank ! _______________________________________ YM - 離線訊息

Hi all, (not sure that this is the right places where send this. sorry) I think that http://www.shorewall.net/Shorewall_Squid_Usage.html must be updated. The current SQUID version (2.6) don''t support anymore the ''httpd_accel'' directives. So anyone that would follow this guide for configure a transparent proxy will receive an error 400. Please modify the guide as

I have what strikes me as an odd problem with shorewall. Let me describe my setup. My desktop (alfred) is connected to the network through an ADSL modem. I am running rp-pppoe, and this works perfectly. I have a small home network, with two LANs; an Ethernet LAN (including a machine running Windows XP), and a WiFi LAN, including the laptop (william) I am using now. All the computers except for

by the way, how come the list got another "mail delivery system" email whenever i sent a post?...weird... On 8/30/06, Mail Delivery System <MAILER-DAEMON@mx3-83.sinamail.sina.com.cn> wrote: > This is the Postfix program at host mx3-83.sinamail.sina.com.cn. > > I''m sorry to have to inform you that your message could not > be delivered to one or more recipients.