similar to: GRE over IPSec Tunnels to a Cisco using Openswan

Hello Lartc Mailing List: Been working on something the last week and a half and ALMOST have it working.., just need a few pointers from the wizards on this mailing list to nail it. Ok, my setup is a hub and spoke arrangement, hub is Cisco 2821 with IOS 12.4. Spokes are ruggencom RX1000 routers, Debian based with the following versions installed: rx1000test:~# uname -a Linux rx1000test

Hi All: I have a strange problem that was described in a previous mail but I have stripped the problem down to the following: I have a debian based router that I have setup IPSec with GRE over top. The tunnel addresses are 192.168.2.97 locally, the other side is 192.168.2.110. The tunnel is 192.168.2.96/28. The end points are locally 192.168.1.97(eth1) and 192.168.1.1 the other side''s

Hey all, Anybody been successful running DHCPD on a GRE tunnel? When I tell DHCPD to listen on cisco1 I see this in the log Jul 23 16:21:03 atlantis dhcpd: cisco1: unknown hardware address type 778 Here is the output of ifconfig cisco1 Link encap:UNSPEC HWaddr 8B-8E-28-32-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00 inet addr:10.199.0.2 P-t-P:10.199.0.2

Hi! I read http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/2002q4/006244.html and I did that. Can anyone tell me if there is something else to do for shapeing over tunnels to work? I noticed that gre interfaces don''t have a queue attached. I''m running linux-2.6.15 and iptables-1.3.4 with no patches. Thank you in advance, Sorin.

Hi! I want to add to my previous post that: my setup looks like this internet --> linux router with NAT and tc ==> gre tunnel ==> forwarding router --> LAN At my NATting router I can "see" the forwarded LAN (192.168.2.0/24). Now let''s say that there is a LAN workstation with the IP 192.168.2.18 and I filter the traffic with tc for it. If the fowarding router has

Hi, I have two systems each with 2 two gre tunnels over ipsec. The tunnels are setup to loadbalance using ''ip route''. Using ping from one server to the other I get equal results via the two gre tunnels, but when I try a large ftp transfer the utilization of one tunnel is 90% and the other 10%. The two interfaces are both 100/full. What would be the reason for this, or would

Hi , I am trying to set up a GRE tunnel between two linux routers. The routers have a 400 MHz Processor. Linux .2 65.0.0.2 Linux LAN1 -------- Router -------- INTERNET ---- Router ---- LAN2 10.10.10.0 .1 208.1.0.1 (Simulated) .1 .1 192.168.2.0/24 /24 Scripts to Create the tunnel ip tunnel add tun0 mode gre remote 65.0.0.1 local

Hi! I have successfully set up traffic shaping at our site using your and others howtos. I have a linux firewall (gateway), two leased lines. I shape only the incoming traffix now. I use HTB+SFQ and sort the packets using iptables with the CLASSIFY patch. It works very well. eth1----ISP2-\ eth2----ISP1--LINUX--internal network eth0 My problem is, that i can not shape my VPN (PPTP)

Am 19.07.2020 um 10:20 schrieb Nils: > > Here are my configurations: > Postfix main.cf: https://pastebin.com/S17jWDQd > Postfix master.cf: https://pastebin.com/W0nynZG6 > dovecot.conf: https://pastebin.com/tMD90Znn Please provide your configurations processed by the tools postconf and doveconf. > This is what my server logs (mail.info, mail.warn) tell me: > root at

Hello, currently I'm working on my first mailserver but I can't log in to the account I made. For now my client (Mozlla Thunderbird) detects the server config (STARTTLS, Port, ...) but it is "Unable to log in at server. Probbly wrong configuration, username or passsword". I know that I added username and password correctly so there must something else be wrong. I run

Postconf: https://pastebin.com/vTVn2UMr Doveconf: https://pastebin.com/nEpZrpzB all my logs from mail.(warn,err,info,log): https://pastebin.com/ccEVUqyd my messges log: https://pastebin.com/cXaEBmcH I'm not sure if you meant this about dict_nis_init but I've done what's explained here: https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/244199/postfix-mail-logs-keep-showing-nis-domain-not-set

Hi, O/S: Fedora Core 6 When running samba-3.0.24-1 (downloaded from Samba WWW site), all is well. But when updating Samba via 'yum update' to samba-3.0.24-5.fc6, things get bad. Things are equally bad when I try the next BETA release of Samba. When things don't work, I try to mount a share from Windows, like: net use z: \\<host>\jeff and it fails. When it fails, I

Hi folks, Be gentle - first time I've posted to this list! ;-) I'll try and be complete. If I missed something, please let me know. I've googled and found some information, but nothing *quite* relevant. Running Fedora Core 6. Been using Samba for a long time, it's always been problem free. Since the Fedora upgrade to 3.0.24-4.fc6 (I know this is something specific to

Hello, I''ve set up a GRE tunnel between two Linux boxes and it''s working well, with or without IPSEC (under GRE). The problem is that when I have no traffic for some minutes, side A cannot communicate to side B any more, unless side B tries to communidate to side A. The same thing happens in the other direction. For example, side A pings side B. No reply. Keep pinging. Side B

Hey guys, i have a problem with building a multi-isp gateway using a GNU/Linux box with priority routing enalbed and after all. any ideas what should i do? maybe a step by step intro? thanks in advanced. Deslay

Hi, how does gre tunnels handle the TOS/DS field in the encapsulated packet? Is the value copied to the encapsulating ip header? thx jason _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

Hi, I have the following setup. Two linux systems with two [test] external interfaces encrypted with ipsec [transport]. Two gre tunnels that pass 10.200.0.0/24 and 10.200.1.0/24 network traffic. Testing the balanced tunnels I would setup iptraf on one and ping from the other. The results would be as expected; traffic would be split between the two interfaces. Testing with an ftp transfer of

Hi everybody, I want to do the following setup : | | Tun1 - Link 1 | Tun1 | | Router A | teql | INTERNET Link - | | teql |router B | | Tun2 - Link 2 | Tun2 | | This should permit to agregate Link 1 and Link 2 (less the cost of the encapsulation). The two tunnels are GRE ip tunnel. It seems to work fine

Hi All, As it is written in the "Linux 2.4 Advanced Routing HOWTO" GRE tunneling has some benefits compare to IP-in-IP, on of it benefits is the ability to transport multicast traffic through a GRE tunnel. I used the mrouted daemon and I know that the daemon supports tunneling but I don''t want to use its tunneling method. Assuming I have gre0 as my tunneling device I did the

Hello, I'm preparing to prepare to take the Graduate Record Exam (GRE) this fall, and I downloaded the GRE PowerPrep software from www.gre.org. Unfortunately, I have not successfully set up the software yet - when I try to get a set of practice questions, the program gives me a Windows dialog box saying "Fatal Error". Then the program stops responding to mouse clicks completely and