similar to: modMCMC runs in FME package

Dear all, I used modFit of the package FME to fit a set of ODE to a ste of eperiemntal data. The summary of this fit give me the following error > summary(Fit) Residual standard error: 984.1 on 452 degrees of freedom Error in cov2cor(x$cov.unscaled) : 'V' is not a square numeric matrix In addition: Warning message: In summary.modFit(Fit) : Cannot estimate covariance; system is

Dear All wonder if you could provide some insights on the following: currently I have this code which produces the expected results: require(deSolve) pars <- list(k = 0.08,v=15) intimes <- c(0,0.5,12) input <- c(800,0,0) forc <- approxfun(intimes, input, method="constant", rule=2) derivs <- function(t, state, pars) { inp <- forc(t) dy1 <- - pars$k * state[1]

> On 22 Jan 2020, at 20.59, ratatouille <ratatouille at bitclusive.de> wrote: > > Hello! > > Since experiments on my testserver two days ago > /var/spool/postfix/private/dovecot-lmtp > is not created anymore. > > This the setting in /etc/dovecot/conf.d/10-master.conf > > service lmtp { > unix_listener /var/spool/postfix/private/dovecot-lmtp { >

Een ingesloten tekst met niet-gespecificeerde tekenset is gescrubt ... Naam: niet beschikbaar URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/attachments/20080918/ed87aa31/attachment.pl>

I am attempting to calibrate a forest growth model using FME. I have several spatially separate plots with time series growth data for each(eg, height, basal area, etc.). Thus 2 independent variables: time and plot. Is there a way that I can calculate a model cost that takes into account these different plots? I notice in the documentation for the modCost function that there is a note

* Apologies for multiple posting * I attached to my previous e-mail a .r file, and it was not permitted by the rules of the mailing lis. Again, please receive my sincere apologies for this. I re-send again the e-mail with .txt attachemnt in the hope someone an help me to solve my problem. I'm trying to fit a set an ODE to an experimental time series. In the attachment you find the R code I

Questions about the port of Xen to ARM with virt extensions are best posted to xen-devel, the xen-arm list focuses on the PV port. Adding xen-devel since it seems you are mainly asking about the w/-virt-extensions port. On Fri, 2012-05-18 at 12:38 +0100, Krishna Pavan wrote: > Please inform the status of Xen-ARM for Cortex-A8 CPU''s on FME from > ARM. AFAIK no one has tried the

Dear R users, I'm trying to fit a set an ODE to an experimental time series. In the attachment you find the R code I wrote using modFit and modCost of FME package and the file of the time series. When I run summary(Fit) I obtain this error message, and the values of the parameters are equal to the initial guesses I gave to them. The problem is not due to the fact that I have only one

Dear List, Wonder if you have some thoughts on the following question using lsoda in desolve: I have the following data and function: require(deSolve) times <- c(0:24) tin  <- 0.5 D <- 400 V    <- 26.3 k <-0.056 k12  <- 0.197118 k21  <- 0.022665 yini <- c(dy1 = 0,dy2 = 0)  events <- data.frame(var = "dy1",time = c(10,15),value = c(200,100),method =

Hello! Since experiments on my testserver two days ago /var/spool/postfix/private/dovecot-lmtp is not created anymore. This the setting in /etc/dovecot/conf.d/10-master.conf service lmtp { unix_listener /var/spool/postfix/private/dovecot-lmtp { group = postfix mode = 0600 user = postfix } } I searched nearly the whole system for lmtp but can't find the reason why. What can

Hi, I was wondering why the results from lm and dynlm are not the same for what I think is the same model. I have just modified example 4.2 from the Pfaff book, please see below for the code and results. Can anyone tell my what I am doing wrongly? Many thanks, Werner set.seed(123456) e1 <- rnorm(100) e2 <- rnorm(100) y1 <- ts(cumsum(e1)) y2 <- ts(0.6*y1 + e2) lr.reg <- lm(y2

disable bogus touchpad device model, which cause annoying dmesg on 2.6 kernel Signed-off-by: Edwin Zhai <edwin.zhai@intel.com> diff -r 7c951e3eb5ab -r 14d3890843d0 tools/ioemu/hw/pckbd.c --- a/tools/ioemu/hw/pckbd.c Wed Oct 19 11:53:00 2005 +0100 +++ b/tools/ioemu/hw/pckbd.c Thu Oct 20 18:28:18 2005 +0800 @@ -29,6 +29,9 @@ /* debug PC keyboard : only mouse */ //#define DEBUG_MOUSE +/*

Hello Sean and Tobias, Sean, Thank you. Could you describe Nick's ideas in few words or give me links to your discussion, so I could adapt my ideas to it. Tobias, Your patch fails on several modules in my benchmark (73 of ~1800 tests). I have sent one as attachment. See statistics files for more details, all the .ll files you could simply find in test-suite object directory (after

Full_Name: Albrecht Gebhardt Version: 0.99.0 OS: alpha, osf4.0 Submission from: (NULL) (143.205.180.40) DEC cc doesn't like c++ style comments // like this one Please use standard cc comments or #if 0 ... #endif A quite large patch follows (I hope it will pass mailing with not too much wrapped lines): --- ./src/main/g_her_glyph.c.dec-cc.patch Mon Feb 7 14:48:10 2000 +++

Hi Stepan, Sorry for the delay. It's great that you are working on MergeFunctions as well and I agree, we should definitely try to combine our efforts to improve MergeFunctions. Just to give you some context, the pass (with the similar function merging patch) is already being used in a production setting. From my point of view, it would be better if we focus on improving its capability