similar to: Manhattan Plot

Dear R users, When I run the following code, R crashes: require(cclust) x <- matrix(c(0,0,0,1.5,1,-1), ncol=2, byrow=TRUE) cclust(x, centers=x[2:3,], dist="manhattan", method="kmeans") While this works: cclust(x, centers=x[2:3,], dist="euclidean", method="kmeans") I'm posting this here because I am not sure if it is a bug. I've been searching

To whom it may concern: My name is Jillian Weinfeld. I am currently and undergraduate student at New York University and working at Mount Sinai School of Medicine doing research with epilepsy patients. At the moment I am creating a manhattan plot with my data set. After reading many forums and such, I have appropriately plotted my data, however, I wanted to see how I can change the colors of the

Hello, I am trying to create a simple Manhattan plot for a small list of 200 SNPs spread out in the genome in different genes. I have tried different functions (using ggplot2 and a function created by Stephen Turner, mhtplot etc.)-none of them work smoothly. Does anyone have a simple way to create the plot (not for all 22 chromosomes)- with the x axis showing the genes name and not the

Hi I've successfully installed Duke Nukem Manhattan Project, but when I try to start it, it prompts for the CD, although the CD is in the drive and the drive is set up properly in Wine settings. It seems people have run the game successfully on wine, so perhaps someone's got a clue about this issue. Thanks for any help!

Greetings, I am reaching out to this mailing list with the following job opportunity. It is with a high-volume, heavy-traffic web property based in Manhattan. The job description is below. If interested please send an updated resume to nathan.madsen@algomod.com Regards, Nathan Madsen Algomod Technologies Corporation 116 John Street New York, NY 10038 Job # :

Hello Martin Maechler and All, A simple question (I hope): How can I compute the "sum of the dissimilarities" that appears in the pam command (from the cluster package) ? Is it the "manhattan" distance (such as the one implemented by "dist") ? I am asking since I am running clustering on a dataset. I found 7 medoids with the pam command, and from it I have the

Dear All, I'm dealing with a case, where 'manhattan' distance of each of 100 vectors is calculated from 10000 other vectors. For achieving this, following 4 scenarios are tested: 1) scenario 1: > x<-read.table("query.vec") > v<-read.table("query.vec2") > d<-matrix(nrow=nrow(v),ncol=nrow(x)) > for (i in 1:nrow(v)){ + d[i,]<-

Hello all. I wish to run k-means with "manhattan" distance. Since this is not supported by the function "kmeans", I turned to the "pam" function in the "fpc" package. Yet, when I tried to have the algorithm run with different starting points, I found that pam ignores and keep on starting the algorithm from the same starting-points (medoids). For my

Hello, everybody. We are working on a tool for mutation testing. The work is still in progress and far away from being done. However, we have got some results already. And we would like to share them with you. But, let me give you a brief introduction first. ### Mutation Testing In a nutshell, Mutation Testing is a way to evaluate a quality of a test suite. The approach suggests introducing a

Hello Everyone, I have what I think is a complex text parsing task. I've provided some sample data below. There's a relatively simple version of the coding that needs to be done and a more complex version. If someone could help me out with either version, I'd greatly appreciate it. Here are my sample data. haveData <- structure(list(profile_key = structure(c(1L, 1L, 2L, 2L, 2L,

Hello All, Can anyone tell help me understand why the function below doesn't work and how I can fix it? Below are some sample data, some code that works on individual rows of the data, and my attempt to translate that code into a function. My hope is to get the function working and then to apply it to the larger data frame using ddply() from the plyr package or possibly some other approach.

Hi, I'm plotting 4 graphs on one page (2x2 matrix) but I cant seem to get the title for the whole page right. I'm doing: op <- par(mfrow = c(2,2), pty="s") hist(var$V2, breaks="FD",main="Euclidean Metric", xlab="Sum of 3NN ... hist(var$V2, breaks="FD",main="Manhattan Metric", xlab="Sum of 3NN ... hist(var$V2,

Hi Johannes, Silly as me. I just figured out how to correctly use 'alias' metadata. I should define them in IR like below: !3 = !{!3} !4 = !{!4} !5 = !{!5, !3} !6 = !{!6, !4} And then use !5 and !6. The below usage is wrong: !3 = !{!3} !4 = !{!4} Then use !3 and !4 in IR. BR, Terry On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 12:12 AM Johannes Doerfert < johannesdoerfert at gmail.com> wrote:

On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Guo, Xiaoyi <Xiaoyi.Guo at amd.com> wrote: > I mean something like a target-specific fence machine instruction which > forces ordering of all loads/stores. I want to clarify the meaning of > “noalias” in this case. Is the fence machine instruction considered > “touching” all memory and thus breaks the “noalias” contract? > A fence

On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 7:28 PM, Guo, Xiaoyi <Xiaoyi.Guo at amd.com> wrote: > So fence only forces ordering of atomic instructions.**** > > ** ** > > Let me change my question then.**** > > ** ** > > If I have a target-specific intrinsic which forces ordering of ordinary > load/store instructions. Then should it also force ordering of load/stores > to

On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 6:17 PM, Guo, Xiaoyi <Xiaoyi.Guo at amd.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I have the following test case: > > define void @foo(<2 x float>* noalias nocapture %out, <2 x float>* > noalias nocapture %data0) nounwind { > entry: > %val1 = load <2 x float>* %data0, align 8 > store <2 x float> %val1, <2 x float>* %out,

I mean something like a target-specific fence machine instruction which forces ordering of all loads/stores. I want to clarify the meaning of "noalias" in this case. Is the fence machine instruction considered "touching" all memory and thus breaks the "noalias" contract? Xiaoyi From: Eli Friedman [mailto:eli.friedman at gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2013 8:08

In a multi-threaded environment, in order to ensure the memory ordering expressed by the memory fence, certain memory operations should not be moved across the fence, right? From: Eli Friedman [mailto:eli.friedman at gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2013 11:18 AM To: Guo, Xiaoyi Cc: LLVM Dev Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] A question w.r.t fence instruction vs. noalias pointer On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at

On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Guo, Xiaoyi <Xiaoyi.Guo at amd.com> wrote: > In a multi-threaded environment, in order to ensure the memory ordering > expressed by the memory fence, certain memory operations should not be > moved across the fence, right?**** > > ** > Yes, but operations on noalias pointers don't fall into that category. For noalias pointers, while

Hi, All, Our team within the Software and Services Group at Intel is looking for compiler engineers to join us. Currently two positions are available, see attached links. If you are interested, you can apply online or email me at xiangyang.guo at intel.com. Thanks. --Xiangyang (Mark) Guo