similar to: New user with issues

Last question, I promise, I am running PopTop for PPTP on the same box as my firewall. I can connect to the box fine, but nothing will route between the VPN tunnel and the local hosts. I read the Some Hosts have Special Firewalling Requirements article and though it was what I needed, but either I don''t get it, or it doesn''t apply to me. Here is my config: Zones: #ZONE

Hi all, I have a client that has 4 subnets within his building, internet, office, business center and wireless. My plan is to use Shorewall but I have never tested it with more than 2 interfaces. Is this possible? Would there be any issues that might arise. Each subnet would have access to the internet but there will be no communications allowed between the others. Thanks in advance....

Hi, I have 2 internet nic''s with differents ISPs. eth0 = isp1 eth3 = isp2 My internal network is eth1 # /etc/interfaces net eth0 detect routefilter,norfc1918,blacklist net eth3 detect routefilter,norfc1918,blacklist loc eth1 detect # /etc/policy loc net ACCEPT net net DROP

Xen appears to kernel panic. Boot up terminates and hangs with the message "agpgart: Maximum main memory to use for agp memory: 152 M. " This is a compiled Xen-2.0 latest snapshot with agp support in the kernel. Has anyone else had similar problems with agp? Nate ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Sybase ASE Linux Express

Maybe this is a faq. but how? I pronounce it as "ZEN". in Japanese, it is same pronounce as "zen", a kind of Taoism. --- Okajima. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from

(Me Too ++: I''m running into the same issues with a non-nptl DB4 and rpm on rhel4) And making it even more interesting: http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/RHEL-4-Manual/release-notes/as-x86/ "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 will no longer include support for LinuxThreads. Therefore, applications that require LinuxThreads support must be updated before they will be able to

Hi Folks, Can i account proxyarped pc´s ?? Like know how much web traffic passthru a specific person ip using shorewall ? So i can know how much bandwidth that specific IP EAT ? Thanks alot Carlos Arnt ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward

Hi i have a small problems on one of my interface : i can''t get traffic out and don''t know why. Ither user say me that i can use Shorewall for create the counter and after get the information for mrtg. Anyone know what is the process into shorewall 2.0.X ? i don''t want monitor by specified port, but all ports Thanks for your help

Hello I''ve got a problem with my shorewall. It still wont route the ICQ file-transfers through the fw box. I''ve put those 2 lines into the rules-file DNAT net loc:192.168.0.1 tcp 3001:3020 DNAT net loc:192.168.0.1 udp 3001:3020 and set up my client to use 3001:3020 for file transfers, but i cant get anything

Hello. I''ve downloaded and burned the Xen DemoCD 1.2. It boots fine, and generally seems to work well. However, when I try to create a domain via xc_dom_create.py I get an ImportError (from a python module I''m guessing). Problem is that it can''t open the libxc.so.1.2 shared object. And sure enough, it''s not there. libxc.so is in /usr/lib, but not

I pulled unstable yesterday and noticed xc_dom_create.py does not have a default value for cpu, so python complains Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/xc_dom_create.py", line 408, in ? (current_id, current_port) = make_domain() File "/usr/bin/xc_dom_create.py", line 234, in make_domain id = xc.domain_create( mem_kb=mem_size*1024,

On Fri, 25 Feb 2005, BitKeeper Bot wrote: > ChangeSet 1.1265, 2005/02/25 22:55:44+00:00, akw27@arcadians.cl.cam.ac.uk > diff -Nru a/tools/misc/xend b/tools/misc/xend > --- a/tools/misc/xend 2005-02-26 06:03:12 -05:00 > +++ b/tools/misc/xend 2005-02-26 06:03:12 -05:00 > @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ > import socket > import time > > -XCS_PORT = 1633 > +XCS_PATH =

Hi, I''m using xen on two-node redhat cluster (CVS devel version), using lvm as storage backend. redhat cluster is used to synchronize LVM metadata (using clvmd) and as storage for domain configs and dom-U kernels (with gfs). Latest version of redhat cluster works with xen-2.0.4, but not with xen-2.0-testing. ccsd failed to start on 2.0-testing. Anyone knows what the problem is? I

hi, I seem to have a problem with the Linux xen-network driver leaking skbs. This is probably my own fault, upon resumption after migration I call this: void network_resume(void) { struct net_device* dev = __dev_get_by_name("eth0"); MOD_DEC_USE_COUNT; network_open(dev); } -- which works fine. However, in network_open() the call to NETOP_RESET_RINGS seems to clear all the

google yields nothing except for indicating that it is a boot loader problem. my dom0 partition is on a 9 GB SCSI disk drive. I have a raid1 device (md0) which I have created a series of partitions via lvm2. on boot, xm create /etc/xen/xm-single -c I get what looks like a normal boot until TCP: Hash tables configured (established 4096 bind 8192) NET: Registered protocol family 1 NET:

Hi, I''m trying to run ntpdate from domain zero and getting weird results. This used to work (prior to using xen). Is this related to xen at all or an entirely unrelated issue? Queries seem to work: # ntpdate -q time-b.nist.gov Looking for host time-b.nist.gov and service ntp host found : time-b.nist.gov server 129.6.15.29, stratum 1, offset 41.820087, delay 0.17027 17

Hi, While investigating why the Xen 1.2 Demo CD won''t boot on a particular laptop, I noticed the download image appears to be truncated. "isoinfo -d -i xendemo-1.2.iso" reports: Logical block size is: 2048 Volume size is: 294080 That would suggest the image size should be 294080 * 2048 = 602275840 bytes. However I only have 292376 * 2048 = 598786048 bytes. The web server

Looking at the 2.0 code, it looks like the guest OSs are made to believe that PSE is not available. Is this a design choice? Has any work been done on supporting 4M pages in guest kernels? Regards, K. Y ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover

>> Hello, >> >> I am using Debian Sarge, with Shorewall 2.2.3, >> >> for access control I am using hosts.allow : >> >> ALL: 144.131.xxx.xxx >> >> and hosts.deny: >> >> ALL: ALL >> >> I have a virtual machine that is being port forwarded to with Shorewall : >> >> DNAT net loc:10.0.0.100 tcp 3389

Apologies if this is the wrong place to post this question. In that event, please point me in the right direction. My question is whether or not I can use Xen with OpenMosix. The upshot of what I''m attempting to do is this: 1. Build a two to four node cluster using OpenMosix for "raw horsepower" 2. Use Xen on the OpenMosix cluster to divide the "raw horsepower" any