similar to: LVM Checksum error when using persistent grants (#linux-next + stable/for-jens-3.8)

Hi, I created an HVM type virtual machine and installed RHEL5U7 guest in it. I have assigned 7 scsi disks to the virtual machine in physical mode (using phy:), however, I see those disks are xvd and not as scsi. Is anyone aware what the problem might be ? Please let me know what kind of information do I need to post in order to narrow down to the problem. Thanks, K

Hi all, Is anyone successfully running/has succesfully upgraded to 2.6.32-220 from, say, 2.6.32-71.29.1? (i.e. done a normal run-of-the-mill yum update on, say a 6.0 instance all the way up cleanly to 6.2? Reason I ask is that booting into -220 (and I think also into -131 as well) results in a kernel panic for me. Some digging around and the new kernel seems to be enumerating the drives with the

Hi, I am trying to recover data from my old system which had LVM. The disk had two partitions - /dev/sda1 (boot, Linux) and /dev/sda2 (Linux LVM). I had taken a backup of both partitions using dd. Now I am booting of CentOS live cd for system restore. I recreated partitions like previous system using fdisk and then used dd to dump all the data onto it. I would like to mount sda2 as LVM, but I

Dear friends: Using Centos 5. I have two physical drives. During install, I made sure to check hdb as well as hda. Both were listed as partitions (which is correct). But my fstab file does not show hdb. How do I make sure that hdb has been formatted and is part of my file system. If hdb is not formatted, how do I format it, please. Sorry for the question. I am a newbie. d[sher at localhost

Hey, I have a nighly build/test system that boots various machines with upstream Linux and randomly selects Xen 4.1, Xen 4.2, Xen 4.3 and unstable. After a bit of digging I found out that Xen 4.2 ''xl'' (but not ''xm'') has some badness in it. When "migrating" (''xl'' save followed by ''xl'' restore'') the PVHVM

I did a default install and after installing some other things I realized that a lot of space was allocated to /home as an lvm that is never going to be used. Is it possible to remove the lvm and grow the root (xfs) filesystem without starting over? -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com

I'm trying to create a 500GB lv volume on a 500GB physical volume, but can't: [root at francois-pc ~]# pvscan PV /dev/sdd VG freenas lvm2 [500.00 GB / 500.00 GB free] PV /dev/sdc VG thecus lvm2 [1010.00 GB / 910.00 GB free] PV /dev/mapper/ddf1_RAIDp2 VG VolGroup00 lvm2 [931.25 GB / 0 free] Total: 3 [2.38 TB] / in use: 3 [2.38 TB]

Hi all I have a remote server (i.e SSH access only) which was incorrectly partitioned and I urgently need to get it up and running. It's got a 500GB HDD, but the PV is only 10GB big, so I can't add more LV's to to. P.S. This is on LVM, btw. [root at nd11176 ~]# fdisk -l /dev/sda Disk /dev/sda: 500.1 GB, 500107862016 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 60801 cylinders Units = cylinders

I posted this to the Fedora-list, but thought I might get some additional information here as well. I have a HD that refuses to mount with a 'bad magic number in super-block'. I'm running FedoraCore 6 x86_64. [root at moe ~]# fdisk -l /dev/hdc Disk /dev/hdc: 250.0 GB, 250059350016 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 30401 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes

Hi, I have CentOS 5.0 which use an old hard disk. And recently I found there are some bad sector on it ... I try to backup my data to other CentOS 5.0 box .... What I did is. I remove the old HD (with bad sector) and install it as a slave IDE on a working CentOS 5.0 ... I try to mount the old HD as /mnt/oldDisk but since it's a LVM, the "mount -t ext3" doesn't work. I'm

Hi, I recently installed centos for the first time and I like it! Also, I just started working with lvm. The following warnings are genertated whenever I run one of lvm commands on the external usb disk (MyBook by Western Digital). * What could be the source for those messages? * Should I worry about them (writing into the created LV's seems to work)? * If yes, how to fix them? [root

Am 2015-09-17 09:29, schrieb Pasi K?rkk?inen: > > Are you using nfs over UDP or TCP ? > TCP, but Network cant be the bottleneck, have tested it with iperf between bare metal/domU's and the nfs domU and it was perfectly fast... > > I don't think. > > > If you used NFS over UDP, try running it over TCP. no I use it over TCP... > > What does

This patch reworks how we start up LVM and lvmetad. It fixes the problem we had converting a guest which had a peculiar LVM configuration: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1581810#c14 However please note I have NOT yet tested it fully. Rich.

When the daemon starts up it creates a fresh (empty) LVM configuration and starts up lvmetad (which depends on the LVM configuration). However this appears to cause problems: Some types of PV seem to require lvmetad and don't work without it (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1581810). If we don't start lvmetad earlier, the device nodes are not created. Therefore move the

Hi libvirt 5.2.0 should support maxGrantFrames setting for xen (changelog). I get ever an error if I use it in the config: <domain type='xen'> <name>satan.chao5.int</name> <uuid>f1f96b1c-fb75-4707-afb7-604d696d29cc</uuid> <memory unit='KiB'>3145728</memory> <currentMemory unit='KiB'>3145728</currentMemory>

[This email is either empty or too large to be displayed at this time]

Hello, I have a physical volume with no volume group. # /sbin/pvscan -n WARNING: only considering physical volumes in no volume group PV /dev/sdg2 lvm2 [148.95 GB] Total: 1 [148.95 GB] / in use: 0 [0 ] / in no VG: 1 [148.95 GB] Can I just create a volume group -- for example: # vgcreate my_volume_group /dev/sdg2 and then activate it: # vgchange -a y my_volume_group I

hi everybody my guests had drives passed though, like here: <disk type='block' device='lun'> <driver name='qemu' type='raw' cache='none'/> <source dev='/dev/sdv'/> <target dev='sda' bus='scsi'/> <address type='drive' controller='0' bus='0'

Hi all, I'm not sure if this is the right place to ask, but it's worth a shot. I have installed CentOS 6.5 on one of our servers, and have just installed SolusVM. I have also set up LVM, with a PV on /dev/sda4 (which is GPT formatted, and 3.12TB is size). The problem I'm having is that when I create the VG, it will not show up under /dev/<VG-name>, which it's supposed to

>The service you are referring to is hostnamed [1]. hostnamed is >designed to start on request and terminate after an idle period. >Programs on your computer are probably querying the service to >determine if your hostname has changed. I see that I couldn't previously find it with systemctl because it is a "static" service, neither enabled nor disabled. What is