Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "linux 3.1.0 - no network offload"
2008 Aug 20
44
GPL PV drivers for Windows 0.9.11-pre12
I''ve just uploaded 0.9.11-pre12 of the GPL PV drivers for Windows.
Since -pre10 (and -pre11) I''ve fixed a heap of crashes that were
plaguing xennet under load, and also rewritten the interrupt/event
distribution logic to improve performance.
Under windows 2003 I can now get network speeds of 1-2Gbit/second TX and
600Gbit/second RX, which is considerably better than I was
2008 Aug 20
44
GPL PV drivers for Windows 0.9.11-pre12
I''ve just uploaded 0.9.11-pre12 of the GPL PV drivers for Windows.
Since -pre10 (and -pre11) I''ve fixed a heap of crashes that were
plaguing xennet under load, and also rewritten the interrupt/event
distribution logic to improve performance.
Under windows 2003 I can now get network speeds of 1-2Gbit/second TX and
600Gbit/second RX, which is considerably better than I was
2010 Jun 11
10
Slow TCP performance between Windows Vista and Xen PV-on-HVM guest
I am running a Xen HVM guest with netfront PV drivers. This is running SLES10 SP3 inside the guest. The Dom0 is also SLES10 SP3.
Now I am trying to communicate from that HVM guest to a Windows Visa or also Windows 7 machine and I am getting really poor TCP performance. When tracing on the network traffic, I can see that no packets are dropped or missing or anything, but what happens is that the
2010 Mar 17
11
Checksumming problem in pv_ops dom0 kernel / netback
Hello,
I seem to be having some troubles regarding the latest 2.6.31.6 and 2.6.32.9 Xen dom0 pv_ops trees.
Our platform:
-Xen 3.4.3-rc3 (also tried 3.4.2 on 2.6.31.6 pv_ops dom0)
-2.6.32.9 pv_ops dom0 kernel, perhaps a week old checkout from xen/stable git (can provide changeset if requested).
-100+ domU''s, all PV.
Ever since we switched to a pv_ops dom0 kernel (we were using 2.6.26
2013 May 14
17
gplpv: re-enabling the nic adapter removes it
I guess I have stumbled upon a bug in gplpv drivers.
If you try to re-enable an nic adapter after disabling it, it just
hides out of blue. And you have to reboot.
Latest version of gplpv drivers and Windows 2008 R2 here.
Anyone else noticed the same issue?
I wonder if this is related to hot-plugging something like
2013 Jan 04
31
xennet: skb rides the rocket: 20 slots
Hi Ian,
Today i fired up an old VM with a bittorrent client, trying to download some torrents.
I seem to be hitting the unlikely case of "xennet: skb rides the rocket: xx slots" and this results in some dropped packets in domU, I don''t see any warnings in dom0.
I have added some extra info, but i don''t have enough knowledge if this could/should be prevented from
2012 Feb 07
7
GPLPV, RDP and network latency
Hello!
Has anybody experienced network latency problems with combination of Windows 7, GPLPV drivers and RDP connection?
Any Windows pop-up message(such as "command not found" error message in "Run command:" dialog, or dividing by zero in windows calc) causes a short freeze of RDP session and looks like that from dom0:
PING 192.168.44.65 (192.168.44.65) 56(84) bytes of data.
2012 Jun 28
8
GPLPV, clock drift and PVUSB in Windows XP HVM
1. Shouldn''t the GPLPV drivers take care of the (bad) clock drift I''m experiencing in my Windows XP HVM? Or is there some other way around this problem that I haven''t been able to find on Google? How can I tell if the GPLPV drivers are active? I''ve added the /gplpv switch to the boot.ini file and the virtual NIC is definitely using the GPLPV version but other
2008 Nov 14
10
GPLPV (9.11pre20) in Win2003 x64 on XenServer Enterprise 5.0 (CD drive missing)
Hello,
Introduction
------------
I''m introducing myself since it''s my first post here.
My name is Roel Broersma and my company is using Xenserver 5.0, we''re using
Xenserver since it was from Xensource. Nowadays it''s Citrix and we have
several expensive licenses, paid support and are Citrix certified (Silver
Solution Advisor). However, we''re
2008 Apr 04
7
Linux TCP Checksum offload limitations
Some version of Windows appear to give the network adapter driver a
packet broken up into fairly small pieces, eg
Page 0: 14 bytes of Ethernet Header
Page 1: 20 bytes of IP Header
Page 2: 20 bytes of TCP Header
Page 3: 1460 bytes of TCP Data
When this happens, Linux appears to not pass the packets beyond the
vifX.Y interface - a tcpdump on (say) vif455.0 shows packets but a
tcpdump on eth0 does
2009 Jul 18
26
network misbehaviour with gplpv and 2.6.30
With GPLPV under 2.6.30, GPLPV gets the following from the ring:
ring slot n (first buffer):
status (length) = 54 bytes
offset = 0
flags = NETRXF_extra_info (possibly csum too but not relevant)
ring slot n + 1 (extra info)
gso.size (mss) = 1460
Because NETRXF_extra_info is not set, that''s all I get for that packet.
In the IP header though, the total length is 1544 (which in itself
2009 Jul 18
26
network misbehaviour with gplpv and 2.6.30
With GPLPV under 2.6.30, GPLPV gets the following from the ring:
ring slot n (first buffer):
status (length) = 54 bytes
offset = 0
flags = NETRXF_extra_info (possibly csum too but not relevant)
ring slot n + 1 (extra info)
gso.size (mss) = 1460
Because NETRXF_extra_info is not set, that''s all I get for that packet.
In the IP header though, the total length is 1544 (which in itself
2008 Jul 11
8
Another GPLPV pre-release 0.9.11-pre7
I''ve just uploaded 0.9.11-pre7. save/restore should be working for 32
bits on both SMP and UP, and maybe for 64 bits although it''s not tested.
If someone could test migration it would be much appreciated.
The installer seems to not install the drivers under 64 bit
environment... but they can then be installed manually. Not sure why at
this point.
2008 Jul 11
8
Another GPLPV pre-release 0.9.11-pre7
I''ve just uploaded 0.9.11-pre7. save/restore should be working for 32
bits on both SMP and UP, and maybe for 64 bits although it''s not tested.
If someone could test migration it would be much appreciated.
The installer seems to not install the drivers under 64 bit
environment... but they can then be installed manually. Not sure why at
this point.
2010 Aug 24
4
Slow windows network with gplpv driver.
Have 4 xen servers with windows domains.
2 work OK and 2 have xp domains with slow network performance.
Doing most of the testing on a xen system that currently is not in production.
Running xen 4.0 with 2.6.32 kernel from lenny backports.
Have xp service pack3 freshly installed with no updates.
Installed gplpv gplpv_XP_0.11.0.213.msi
hdtack gives 60mb/sec which is good
iperf gives ~15Mbits/sec
2010 Jun 02
14
ARP problems with xen 4.0 with pvops kernel
Hello,
Finally I managed to get a xen 4.0 working on ubuntu 10.04 with pvops
kernel and libvirt. However I am having some problems with networking...
after initial installation with netinstall image in hvm mode, when I
transform the vm in xen pv (via pygrub with the current ubuntu kernel),
networking startEd to act weird...
Basically I''m not using a network script from xen. I define a
2010 Jun 02
14
ARP problems with xen 4.0 with pvops kernel
Hello,
Finally I managed to get a xen 4.0 working on ubuntu 10.04 with pvops
kernel and libvirt. However I am having some problems with networking...
after initial installation with netinstall image in hvm mode, when I
transform the vm in xen pv (via pygrub with the current ubuntu kernel),
networking startEd to act weird...
Basically I''m not using a network script from xen. I define a
2009 Jan 17
25
GPLPV network performance
Just reporting some iperf results. In each case, Dom0 is iperf server,
DomU is iperf client:
(1) Dom0: Intel Core2 3.16 GHz, CentOS 5.2, xen 3.0.3.
DomU: Windows XP SP3, GPLPV 0.9.12-pre13, file based.
Iperf: 1.17 Gbits/sec
(2) Dom0: Intel Core2 2.33 GHz, CentOS 5.2, xen 3.0.3.
DomU: Windows XP SP3, GPLPV 0.9.12-pre13, file based.
Iperf: 725 Mbits/sec
(3) Dom0: Intel Core2 2.33 GHz,
2013 Jun 24
3
[PATCH v2] xen-netback: add a pseudo pps rate limit
VM traffic is already limited by a throughput limit, but there is no
control over the maximum packet per second (PPS).
In DDOS attack the major issue is rather PPS than throughput.
With provider offering more bandwidth to VMs, it becames easy to
coordinate a massive attack using VMs. Example: 100Mbits ~ 200kpps using
64B packets.
This patch provides a new option to limit VMs maximum packets per
2008 Jun 01
65
Release 0.9.5 of GPL PV Drivers for Windows
I''ve just made my first ever attempt at an Nullsoft installer, so if you
want to try it download "Xen PV Drivers 0.9.5.exe" from
http://www.meadowcourt.org/downloads/
The installer should detect the version of windows you are running and
install the drivers. At the moment you''ll need to install the shutdown
monitor service manually, but you can do that from the start