similar to: some confusion about SR and PBD and ...

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 8000 matches similar to: "some confusion about SR and PBD and ..."

2011 Dec 19
1
pbd-plug failing when attaching an SR that was introduced
Any troubleshooting steps I can follow to get this SR attached again? Has anyone seen this error before? xe pbd-plug uuid=b804d322-c501-6b59-fb7e-b6612042535c There was an SR backend failure. status: non-zero exit stdout: stderr: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/opt/xensource/sm/LVMSR", line 1446, in ? SRCommand.run(LVHDSR, DRIVER_INFO) File
2012 Apr 17
0
failure("Storage_access failed with: SR_BACKEND_FAILURE_47: [ ; The SR is not available
Hello, Please excuse my complete xen ignorance but I am hoping someone will be able ot help me out here. I recently built my first Xen box using a 2, 1TB drives in a raid configuration, 2TB total. I installed Xen, I am able to access it via XenCenter. However, I am trying to use some of that 2TB as a local datastore but for the life of me I cannot get it mounted, I keep on getting this error:
2008 Apr 01
0
[07/17][PATCH] kvm/ia64: Add TLB virtulization support.-V8
Zhang, Xiantao wrote: >>From 6b731c15afa8cec84f16408c421c286f1dd1b7d3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Xiantao Zhang <xiantao.zhang at intel.com> > Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 13:45:40 +0800 > Subject: [PATCH] KVM:IA64 : Add TLB virtulization support. > > vtlb.c includes tlb/VHPT virtulization. > Signed-off-by: Anthony Xu <anthony.xu at intel.com> >
2008 Apr 01
0
[16/18]KVM:IA64 : Add kvm sal/pal virtulization support.V9
Zhang, Xiantao wrote: >>From 5c70c038c57190144390ae9d30c3d06afba103d4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Xiantao Zhang <xiantao.zhang at intel.com> > Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 14:59:30 +0800 > Subject: [PATCH] KVM:IA64 : Add kvm sal/pal virtulization support. > > Some sal/pal calls would be traped to kvm for virtulization > from guest firmware. > Signed-off-by: Xiantao
2008 Apr 01
0
[07/17][PATCH] kvm/ia64: Add TLB virtulization support.-V8
Zhang, Xiantao wrote: >>From 6b731c15afa8cec84f16408c421c286f1dd1b7d3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Xiantao Zhang <xiantao.zhang at intel.com> > Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 13:45:40 +0800 > Subject: [PATCH] KVM:IA64 : Add TLB virtulization support. > > vtlb.c includes tlb/VHPT virtulization. > Signed-off-by: Anthony Xu <anthony.xu at intel.com> >
2008 Apr 01
0
[13/18] KVM:IA64: Add optimization for some virtulization faults V9
Zhang, Xiantao wrote: >>From 0d698efed15759b49e78adcef085feda0a14a175 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Xiantao Zhang <xiantao.zhang at intel.com> > Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 14:57:09 +0800 > Subject: [PATCH] KVM:IA64: Add optimization for some virtulization > faults > > optvfault.S Add optimization for some performance-critical > virtualization faults. >
2008 Mar 28
0
[12/17][PATCH] kvm/ia64: add optimization for some virtulization faults
Hi, >>From 2dbf7c93ff5e36a221761c690ff12e7be48a6bb2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >From: Xiantao Zhang <xiantao.zhang at intel.com> >Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 13:49:38 +0800 >Subject: [PATCH] kvm/ia64: add optimization for some virtulization >faults > >optvfault.S adds optimization for some performance-critical >virtualization >faults. >Signed-off-by: Anthony Xu
2013 Mar 05
1
Bug#702340: xe sr-create creates nested PV/VG
Package: xcp-xe Version: 1.3.2-14 Severity: normal I created an LV manually and ran the command: xe sr-create type=ext name-label=myHostSr0 \ device-config:device=/dev/mapper/vg00-sr0 The SR was created, however, I found that it was created as a nested LV, in other words, it appears xe did something like this: pvcreate /dev/mapper/vg00-sr0 vgcreate sr_vg lvcreate sr_vg sr0
2010 Feb 01
3
Fault Tolerance
Hi people... I want know if Source Codes Virtulization Solution from Red Hat has be release? Thanks -- Gilberto Nunes
2008 May 05
1
how to plots two pairwise data sets into a same graph
Dear all: I fitted "Observed" into a distribution as frequency. The predicted values are calculated as "predicted" for frequency. bins is "x". I plot observed, predicted against x in a graph. the commond is here.
2013 Oct 07
1
Bug#725676: resizing SR fails
Package: xcp-xapi Version: 1.3.2-14 I've expanded the underlying volume for the SR xe sr-scan doesn't seem to detect the new space I've tried various things: - using pvresize so that LVM detects the bigger partition pvresize /dev/sda6 and the pvscan command now shows the correct space. running "xe sr-scan uuid=$UUID" after this failed to detect the space -
2008 Apr 22
6
bandwidth limiting - vif "rate" option
Hello everybody, i have found, that i can limit the OUTGOING bandwidth with the option "rate=" (e.g. rate=250KB/s) at the vif line in my sxp-file. I have tested it, it is working good, but why it is "only" limiting the outgoing bandwidth ? Is there any easy way to limit the incoming bandwidth too, something like the obove option ? My network setup is bridged. Thank you in
2007 Mar 07
1
ioemu in config file and O_DIRECT option
In config file, ''*type=ioemu*'' is added with vif . Does it make the difference if we don''t add. Because i did not notice any difference in para as well as full virtulization. Same as in case of exporting the disk to Guest dom. Is it just a placeholder or else ? Second thing, I am running RHEL3 as a HVM DomU on xen-3.0.4. Every thing works fine, but i had a problem to
2007 Jul 04
1
kvm developers' forum 2007
We's like to invite all of you to attend the first annual KVM Forum 2007. Please click here http://www.qumranet.com/KVMForum2007.php to be taken to the event site where you can learn more about the KVM Forum 2007 and register online. Hosted by the KVM Developer Community, the purpose of the forum is to bring together developers, testers and other technical individuals from within the community
2007 Jul 04
1
kvm developers' forum 2007
We's like to invite all of you to attend the first annual KVM Forum 2007. Please click here http://www.qumranet.com/KVMForum2007.php to be taken to the event site where you can learn more about the KVM Forum 2007 and register online. Hosted by the KVM Developer Community, the purpose of the forum is to bring together developers, testers and other technical individuals from within the community
2007 Aug 08
0
Allocating 64 kbits/s out of 256 kbits/s for one LAN behind firewall
Hi, I have a CENTOS BOX as a firewall . both iptabes and iproute 2 are running on it. pls see bleow for installed RPMs. [root at firebox ~]# rpm -qa |grep iptables iptables-1.2.11-3.1.RHEL4 [root at firebox ~]# rpm -qa |grep iproute iproute-2.6.9-3.EL4.7 It has 3 ethernet cards. pls see below. eth0 - internet ip (pls asume. 1.2.3.4/29 ). it connects to ISP router. eth1 - 192.168.100.254
2014 Mar 11
3
Adding an application to the list
Dear Sirs, my name is Ksenya, I'm from the ISPsystem company, which develops software products for hosting business automation. We'd like to add VMmanager into the Web-applications section  http://libvirt.org/apps.html#web VMmanager is a solution for virtulization management that enables to create and manage virtual machines.  The libvirt library is used for managing hypervisors, so we
2010 Nov 22
0
XEN4 virt-manager
Hi. I''m trying to work Xen 4 Hypervisor with Full virtualization HVM in my debian squeeze with my virt-manager and I think that I have a problem. My virt-manager when ask my new name guest show one warning that says: "Warning: Host does not appear to support hardware virtualization", but I continue and install and run the Windows Server guest. In My BIOS the
2014 Mar 11
0
Re: Adding an application to the list
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 05:54:10AM +0400, KSENYA PHIL wrote: > > Dear Sirs, > > my name is Ksenya, I'm from the ISPsystem company, which develops software products for hosting business automation. We'd like to add VMmanager into the Web-applications section  http://libvirt.org/apps.html#web > VMmanager is a solution for virtulization management that enables to create and
2020 Apr 27
0
[PATCH v4] vhost: disable for OABI
Hi Michael, Thanks for your patch! On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 5:13 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > vhost is currently broken on the some ARM configs. > > The reason is that the ring element addresses are passed between > components with different alignments assumptions. Thus, if > guest selects a pointer and host then gets and dereferences > it, then