similar to: sr-ivo & hvm & PV

Hello, Is there a HowTo or tutorial about the configuration of VMDq or SR-IOV with XEN? Thanks in advance. Best Regards, -- Houssem MEDHIOUB Research Engineer TELECOM & Management SudParis _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

Greetings Xen user community, I am interested in using Mellanox ConnectX cards with SR-IOV capabilities to passthrough pci-e Virtual Functions (VFs) to Xen guests. The hope is to allow for the use of InfiniBand directly within virtual machines and thereby enable a plethora of high performance computing applications that already leverage InfiniBand interconnects. However, I have run into some

Hi, I'd like to get some feedback on a proposal to enhance virtio-net to ease configuration of a VM and that would enable live migration of passthrough network SR-IOV devices. Today we have SR-IOV network devices (VFs) that can be passed into a VM in order to enable high performance networking direct within the VM. The problem I am trying to address is that this configuration is generally

Hi, I'd like to get some feedback on a proposal to enhance virtio-net to ease configuration of a VM and that would enable live migration of passthrough network SR-IOV devices. Today we have SR-IOV network devices (VFs) that can be passed into a VM in order to enable high performance networking direct within the VM. The problem I am trying to address is that this configuration is generally

On Thu, 30 Nov 2017 15:54:40 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 07:51:38PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > On Thu, 30 Nov 2017 11:29:56 +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > > On 2017?11?29? 03:27, Jesse Brandeburg wrote: > > > > Hi, I'd like to get some feedback on a proposal to enhance virtio-net > > > > to ease configuration of a

On Thu, 30 Nov 2017 15:54:40 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 07:51:38PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > On Thu, 30 Nov 2017 11:29:56 +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > > On 2017?11?29? 03:27, Jesse Brandeburg wrote: > > > > Hi, I'd like to get some feedback on a proposal to enhance virtio-net > > > > to ease configuration of a

On Thu, 30 Nov 2017 11:29:56 +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > On 2017?11?29? 03:27, Jesse Brandeburg wrote: > > Hi, I'd like to get some feedback on a proposal to enhance virtio-net > > to ease configuration of a VM and that would enable live migration of > > passthrough network SR-IOV devices. > > > > Today we have SR-IOV network devices (VFs) that can be passed

On Thu, 30 Nov 2017 11:29:56 +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > On 2017?11?29? 03:27, Jesse Brandeburg wrote: > > Hi, I'd like to get some feedback on a proposal to enhance virtio-net > > to ease configuration of a VM and that would enable live migration of > > passthrough network SR-IOV devices. > > > > Today we have SR-IOV network devices (VFs) that can be passed

On Jul 28, 2011, at 1:38 PM, Rose, Gregory V wrote: > >> From: Anirban Chakraborty [mailto:anirban.chakraborty at qlogic.com] >> Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2011 12:04 PM >> To: Rose, Gregory V >> Cc: David Miller; netdev; Ben Hutchings; Kirsher, Jeffrey T >> Subject: Re: [RFC net-next PATCH 3/4] ethtool: Add new set commands >> >> >> On Jul 28,

On Jul 28, 2011, at 1:38 PM, Rose, Gregory V wrote: > >> From: Anirban Chakraborty [mailto:anirban.chakraborty at qlogic.com] >> Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2011 12:04 PM >> To: Rose, Gregory V >> Cc: David Miller; netdev; Ben Hutchings; Kirsher, Jeffrey T >> Subject: Re: [RFC net-next PATCH 3/4] ethtool: Add new set commands >> >> >> On Jul 28,

[PATCH 4/4] PCI: document SR-IOV SR-IOV Documentation. Signed-off-by: Yu Zhao <yu.zhao at intel.com> Signed-off-by: Eddie Dong <eddie.dong at intel.com> --- Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-pci | 13 ++ Documentation/PCI/00-INDEX | 2 Documentation/PCI/pci-iov-howto.txt | 170 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 185 insertions(+), 0

[PATCH 4/4] PCI: document SR-IOV SR-IOV Documentation. Signed-off-by: Yu Zhao <yu.zhao at intel.com> Signed-off-by: Eddie Dong <eddie.dong at intel.com> --- Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-pci | 13 ++ Documentation/PCI/00-INDEX | 2 Documentation/PCI/pci-iov-howto.txt | 170 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 185 insertions(+), 0

[PATCH 4/4] PCI: document SR-IOV SR-IOV Documentation. Signed-off-by: Yu Zhao <yu.zhao at intel.com> Signed-off-by: Eddie Dong <eddie.dong at intel.com> --- Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-pci | 13 ++ Documentation/PCI/00-INDEX | 2 Documentation/PCI/pci-iov-howto.txt | 170 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 185 insertions(+), 0

Greetings, Following patches are intended to support SR-IOV capability in the Linux kernel. With these patches, people can turn a PCI device with the capability into multiple ones from software perspective, which will benefit KVM and achieve other purposes such as QoS, security, and etc. The Physical Function and Virtual Function drivers using the SR-IOV APIs will come soon! Major changes from

Greetings, Following patches are intended to support SR-IOV capability in the Linux kernel. With these patches, people can turn a PCI device with the capability into multiple ones from software perspective, which will benefit KVM and achieve other purposes such as QoS, security, and etc. The Physical Function and Virtual Function drivers using the SR-IOV APIs will come soon! Major changes from

Greetings, Following patches are intended to support SR-IOV capability in the Linux kernel. With these patches, people can turn a PCI device with the capability into multiple ones from software perspective, which will benefit KVM and achieve other purposes such as QoS, security, and etc. The Physical Function and Virtual Function drivers using the SR-IOV APIs will come soon! Major changes from

If I'm using the SR-IOV Pool assignment method (from http://wiki.libvirt.org/page/Networking#Assignment_from_a_pool_of_SRIOV_VFs_in_a_libvirt_.3Cnetwork.3E_definition ), how would I check how many virtual functions are already in use? Is there a method other then looping through all the active guests and determining if they're using the SR-IOV interface?

Hi, I've been using libvirt (versions 0.9.11.5, and recently upgraded to 0.10.2), and have been attaching an SR-IOV VF to my VM with the following device configuration: <hostdev mode='subsystem' type='pci' managed='yes'> <source> <address domain='0x0000' bus='0x07' slot='0x10' function='0x0'/>

Hello everyone, I'm having problem with SR-IOV transparent VLAN. My host is Fedora 22 and my guest is: pfSense 2.3. The NIC is Intel 82576. I'm using pfSense Packet Capture to check the packet and find that inbound packet still have the vlan tag. The outbound packet seem fine because the router can receive DHCP discover packet from the guest and then send DHCP offer and ARP request

I have an Intel X540 SR-IOV NIC in a box with ACS support running RHEL6.4. Hi Hongming, I'm hoping you can please help with two issues: 1. The pool works, but I transparent VLAN with the pool does not. I have to manually run "ip" afterwards to get it to work. # virsh net-dumpxml em2net <network connections='1'> <name>em2net</name>