similar to: General Linux VM question regarding Xen support

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 5000 matches similar to: "General Linux VM question regarding Xen support"

2012 Sep 15
0
Re: Performance of PVM and HVM
more details: Physical machine: cpu-I5 3.1G, RAM 16G -- View this message in context: http://xen.1045712.n5.nabble.com/Performance-of-PVM-and-HVM-tp5711212p5711286.html Sent from the Xen - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
2012 Sep 17
1
Re: Performance of PVM and HVM
no one care about this -- View this message in context: http://xen.1045712.n5.nabble.com/Performance-of-PVM-and-HVM-tp5711212p5711304.html Sent from the Xen - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
2004 Dec 29
2
Asterisk, she no hang uppa the phone!
I've been working on the local side of asterisk for several days, and I have the in-house dial plan pretty well corn fingered to my satisfaction. Today I began working on the other side to make asterisk do things like place an outgoing call to PSTN and route an incoming call from PSTN. I'm using a TDM11B with a single fxs and a single fxo. My analog handset is plugged into the port
2005 Dec 15
0
Problems with snow and rpvm
Dear Friends, I'm trying to learn to use parallel computation using snow & rpvm Now, I have two boxes: 1) Pentium 4, pvm 3.4.5, R 2.2.0 with FreeBSD 5.4 (box uffbsd); 2) PowerPC, pvm 3.4.5, R 2.1.1 with Debian Linux latest stable (box powerpclinux); I'm using the instructions in (found in snow.pdf) http://www.stat.uiowa. edu/~luke/R/cluster/cluster.html. Now ** from the box
2012 Apr 14
0
Bug#663473: xen-api: General update after the debconf review process
Dear Debian maintainer, On Thursday, March 15, 2012, I sent you a notification about the beginning of a review action on debconf templates for xen-api. Then, I sent you a bug report with rewritten templates and announcing the beginning of the second phase of this action: call for translation updates. Translators have been working hard and here is now the result of their efforts. Please
2009 Dec 23
1
Help with makeClusters for Snow
Hi Everybody, I know that R has snow package which can be used for Parallel Computing. However, every time I try making a cluster, the only type of cluster I'm able to make is the "SOCK" (that too because I disabled the firewalls). For the rest (i.e. MPI, NWS, and PVM), I get error every time I try making one. I get the following errors
2008 Jul 23
0
Convert Trixbox HVM to PVM
Hi list, I recently installed the Trixbox distribution as an HVM and have now converted it to a PVM. Found very few resources on Internet where people had done this conversion so I had very little to compare with. Wanted to ask for comments about the kernel used in the PVM after the conversion. Installing Trixbox and later installing the xenified kernel, gives a kernel of 2.6.18-92..... In my
2007 Apr 06
1
Re: RHEL5 as PVM on RHEL5 xen
Thanks you all guys. I am able to create the RHEL5 PVM on RHEL5 host successfully. Only thing that i need to add is /mnt/etc/fstab in inintrd command and preload to both the fronthend drivers. As blow. # mount /home/disk /mnt # mkinirtd /boot//boot/initrd-2.6.18-8.el5xenU.img 2.6.18-8.el5xen --fstab /mnt/ etc/fstab --with xenblk --with xennet --preload xenblk --preload xennet Thanks a lot,
2006 Aug 11
1
rpvm/snow packages on a cluster with dual-processor machines
Hi, does anybody know how to use the dual processors in the machines of a cluster? I am using R with rpvm and snow packages. I usually start pvm daemon and add host machines first, and then run R to start my computing work. But I find that only one processor in each machine is used in this way and the other one always stays idle. Is there any simple way to tell pvm to use the two processors at
2009 Mar 03
13
xm migrate headache
Hi, I am trying to (live-)migrate a paravirtualized machine from hosta to hostb: -----8<---- hosta:~ # xm list pvm Name ID Mem VCPUs State Time(s) pvm 64 384 1 -b---- 0.5 hostb:~ # xm list pvm Error: Domain ''pvm'' does not exist. hosta:~ # xm migrate pvm 192.168.0.2 Error:
2013 Jan 15
1
rpvm arch check
I've trying to fix the check error in rpvm package. Right now on my Mac, I use darwinport to install PVM and I can get rpvm to pass the check using 'R -arch x86_64 CMD check'. However the default 'R CMD check' uses i386 which fails since PVM is built for x86_64 only. So is there a way to ensure proper architecture is used that matches that of the external library like PVM?
2009 Aug 28
1
How to create a windows vm with ganeti2.
Hi ! I''m tryng to install a windows instance to a ganeti cluster. For the moment, i have configured ganeti2, i have created a debian instance with debootstrap OS, i have created a windows instance with xen commands, with a HVM processor. I have already initialize too my cluster with HVM and PVM option. However, i can''t create a windows vm with ganeti2. my command is:
2006 Aug 11
2
rpvm/snow packages on a cluster with dual-processor machi nes
Caveat: I've only played with this a couple of years ago... I believe you can just add each host _twice_ (or as many times as the number of CPUs at that host) to get both CPUs to work. Andy From: Paul Y. Peng > > Hi, > > does anybody know how to use the dual processors in the > machines of a cluster? I am using R with rpvm and snow > packages. I usually start pvm
2007 Nov 07
1
PVM error message
Hello R enthusiasts, I am working with a Fedora Core 6 OS and R 2.5. I have just finished loading PVM on my test cluster and this is working properly. Also, rpvm has been loaded in R. However, when I try to load my test program, I receive this error: Loading required package: rpvm Error in dyn.load(x, as.logical(local), as.logical(now)) ; unable to load shared library
2005 Nov 08
1
Reducing the deleterious effects ofego related issues on the list
Bryan... NOBODY CARES how many times Chris is wrong. NOBODY CARES what you prove on this point. Whether Chris is right, wrong or stoopid is NOT proper fodder for this (CENTOS) list. Chris being wrong is *strictly* a "Bryan Fixation". Part of YOU growing up is YOU realizing that whether Chris is or is not wrong is UNIMPORTANT to ANYTHING that you or anybody important to you think is
2012 Oct 29
0
Requirements for a PVM enabled distro
(My apologies if this is the wrong list or if this question has been asked before. I’ve done quite a bit of searching and can’t find an answer) I am working on a heavily modified version of CentOS with a user-land that mostly matches 5.4 and a kernel based on 6.2. I''ve found tutorials on how to create a CentOS PVM (such as http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Xen/InstallingCentOSDomU) but I
2010 Mar 24
0
PVM Ubuntu and xconsole error with XEN+CentOS
Hi, I tell you my problem: I've installed a Ubuntu's HVM guest in CentOS with XEN, then I convert my HVM to PVM based in this tutto : http://www.asplund.nu/xencluster/xen-convert-hvm-to-pvm.html After this modification everythings it runs fine but I have a problem with xconsole, I don't see anything when I run the command "xm console ID" , I only see the boot proccess and the
2005 Dec 02
0
problems with R and snow on a debian box only
(Posted also to debian-user) In my office network I have access to a debian powerpc server and 2 freebsd 6 servers (actually one of them is my notebook). Experienced user of the statistical software R, I have now a go at parallel computation via (r-)pvm and snow under R to enhance the performance of a heavy duty statistical problem involving many iteration on the calculation of models. I moved
2012 Jun 07
1
network is only connected for a while when the domU is started
Hi ALL, Here is a weird problem comfusing me for a long time. i''v installed xen 4.0.1 with linux kernel 3.1.0-rc9+ Everything works fine except i cannot ping to the gateway in a PVM domU. i''v installed bridge-utils and brctl show like this bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces eth0 8000.00219b480d56 no
2014 Feb 09
0
Bug#738322: RM: xen-api and friends -- ROM; non maintained upstream
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Hi, Writting this message saddens me, but no choice... Because upstream authors (eg: Citrix) have explained that they cannot maintain the current version of XenAPI, or upgrade it to a newer version, we have no choice but to remove completely XenAPI from both Unstable and Testing. Quoting Euan Harris from Citrix (it's not needed for the FTP masters