similar to: Is it possible to set up multi-level puppet nodes?

Good Day list, I have a friend who is interested in implementing an asterisk implementation at his offices. The configuration would consist of the following Site A ---- Asterisk Box With 12 incoming lines and 15 phones Extensions 101-115 Site B ---- Asterisk Box With 4 incoming lines and 7 phones Extensions 201-207 Site C ---- Asterisk Box With 4 incoming lines and 6 phones

Seeing as the "leastrecent" strategy does not work for us (it will *always* call the leastrecent agent, even if that agent is busy, and will not move to the next agent) I thought I'd try the roundrobin strategy. This seemed to work - however, I had my supervisor telling me today that a certain agent seemed to be getting most of the calls - and when I checked, out of 50 inbound

I am having issues with filebucket. I have looked through the puppet users google groups with similar issues but have not found a solution that works. I am trying to setup a central filebucket on the puppetmaster server. I am replacing the client''s /etc/puppet/puppet.conf file with a preconfigured version. The server delivers a copy of the puppet.conf file to the client, but the backup

Am using dashboard 1.1.1 with the use_file_bucket_diffs option. When clicking on the links within a report it will show the old md5 file (on the left) but not the new md5 file (on the right) like; content content changed ''{md5}26a3112822d01f2ce6b3f052bf2809de'' to ''{md5}dd97364ab0559344d73231f517951595'' 26a3112822d01f2ce6b3f052bf2809de ==> is displayed

Hi everyone, I''ve got several questions that are most probably obvious to some of you but I''m actually a bit ''in the fog'' about filebucket. backup are done on a md5 basis so 1 file is generated whatever the number of clients if it''s the same md5. That a really good option. On the other hand let''s say that after 3 months I need to restore a /

Hello, I'm trying to setup a queue where call goes from agent to agent in strictly set order. I have queue (roundrobin): Agent1 penalty 1 Agent2 penalty 2 Agent3 penalty 3 When I call to this queue Agent1 rings. If this agent does not take the call, after set timeout same Agent1 is dialed again. The call never goes to Agent2 (only when Agent1

I''ve done some more development on my Puppet module that handles password integration with Secret Server from Thycotic, and now it handles certificates as well. This allows you to have a ''password'' define that ensures the password is stored in SecretServer, and changes it on a regular basis: password { ''root'': maxage=>60; } password {

I''m trying to setup a mongrel cluster. I''m relying on information collected from a number of sources but I''m relying heavily on http://mongrel.rubyforge.org/docs/apache.html. I have noted that a number of sources mention the necessity of having the mod_balancer module installed in Apache. However, my primary source makes no mention of this; but instead, mentions only

Hi, I have a scenario that I am failing to implement using the Queue app, but which I had thought would be commonplace... 1) (this bit works fine) I want a queue caller to have access to the basic set of agents initially, with an overflow to additional agents if they are busy - This is done using penalty: queues.conf: member => SIP/dev1,0,Agent1 member => SIP/dev2,0,Agent2 member =>

Hi All, I was wondering if it is possible to NOT show an event in puppet dashboard. I have an exec resource that fires of a ruby script. This is triggering a changed event on every run, but actually I want to exclude this from showing up as "CHANGED" Is this possible, if so how can I achieve this? --- myscript: --- exec { "run_myscript" : #

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Hello, at the moment I fight with puppetdoc and end in a ruby confusion. To the problem: > puppetdoc --debug --trace --mode rdoc --all manifests/site.pp info: scanning: ["manifests/site.pp"] /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/puppet/util/rdoc.rb:82:in `output_resource_doc'' /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/puppet/util/rdoc.rb:82:in `sort''

I''m trying to connect multiple masters to one dashboard and I''m having trouble with Facter. I started out initially with one master connected to the dashboard and that one works perfectly fine. Then I added a second master by setting the reporturl to point to the dashboard. The new nodes appeared and it shows the run results without any problems. The issue I''m

** I installed PE Master on one VM and Agents on two VMs pointing to master . Agent1 VM 64 bit works fine , but agent2 VM 32 bit fails with below error. Only difference is architecture. One more note both the agent nodes were accepted from Dashboard,so master has both the certificates. Any help will be greatly appreciated. puppet-enterprise-3.1.0-el-6-i386]# puppet agent --test Info:

Hi all, I''m having a stupid moment getting a remote file bucket working. My client only file buckets locally, not remotely. I have this site.pp: ********* filebucket { "main": server => "puppet" } File { backup => "main" } node ''default'' { include test } ********* and this test module: ********* class test { file {

I''ve been trying to find information, suggestions, etc. for how to combine scaling Puppet with the use of management tools like Dashboard/Foreman and MCollective. Our current thinking for an initial deployment is two VMs as Puppet Master worker nodes fronted by a pair of NetScalers. However, I''m not sure how to go about implementing Dashboard or Foreman and MCollective servers in

Has anyone else ran into this? debug: /Stage[main]/Mcollective/File[/var/tmp/facts.yaml]/content: Executing ''diff -u /var/tmp/facts.yaml /tmp/puppet-file20121214-13448-933j3r-0'' notice: /Stage[main]/Mcollective/File[/var/tmp/facts.yaml]/content: --- /var/tmp/facts.yaml 2012-12-14 00:53:20.000000000 +0000 +++ /tmp/puppet-file20121214-13448-933j3r-0 2012-12-14

Hi, Is there a way to control access to the filebucket? Specifically, I wish to allow agents to backup to the filebucket but never restore. Is this possible to do? Thanks, Brian -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

I just upgraded the second half of a two node puppetmaster cluster and now I am having issues with puppet-dashboard report processing. If I have workers running on both servers, they try to process each others reports, but since the report data file is not there, it fails. I would have assumed this data was local, not in the database. Does anyone else have this issue, or have a suggestion

So I''m new to puppet and I''m having a bear of a time just getting a test server going. I installed puppet and the puppet client via yum on CentOS on AWS, so that saved me some time. I followed a few various blog posts about getting everything set up and applying a file, etc. Now I am trying to install a module (puppetlabs/apache) and it''s failing miserably for me. I

Was file bucketing changed as part of this release or is this a bug? When I look in my bucket folder I see: drwxr-xr-x 2 puppet puppet 4096 Mar 17 00:04 5222e054e7bc6248f2e9b9146f75aff5 drwxr-xr-x 2 puppet puppet 4096 Mar 17 00:04 3255ad7efedebfd3eccbba74845002a1 drwxr-xr-x 2 puppet puppet 4096 Mar 17 00:04 f8569b1c57819072c37b36bd3814e328 drwxr-xr-x 2 puppet puppet 4096 Mar