similar to: Class Including.

Good morning, We''ve been testing PE and beginning developing modules for our infrastructure. One of the modules I''m looking to create is an installation for Splunk, with the primary focus at this time, on the Forwarder. I already have the splunkforwarder-5.0.1-143156-linux-2.6-amd64.deb package being fetched from the Master and also performing the installation via dpkg. I

I noticed that is if I uninstall an MSI that was installed by Puppet, Puppet does not notice. Looking at the source I see it might be checking for a state file to know whether a package is installed or not: C:\ProgramData\PuppetLabs\puppet\var\db\package\msi\SplunkForwarder.yml So one has to rememebr to delete that too.... Is this design not a problem? Thanks, Mohamed. -- You received this

Hello all, I'm running a 64bit Centos5 setup and am trying to mount a gluster filesystem (which is exported out of the same box). glusterfs --debug --volfile=/root/gluster/webspace2.vol /home/webspace_glust/ Gives me: <snip> [2009-08-11 16:26:37] D [client-protocol.c:5963:init] glust1b_36: defaulting ping-timeout to 10 [2009-08-11 16:26:37] D [transport.c:141:transport_load]

Hi everybody, I just started thinking about a project and am seeking some help regarding its design. The idea would be to create labels (i.e. address labels).I could let users type the text manually, but I dont think they would appreciate that when they''ll want to print 5000 addresses. I can also probably let them import csv files, that should not be a problem, but playing with those

Hi Guys, At work we need a better way of running our machines. We''ve got 14 machines around the world that we look after (mostly web servers but a few run mail and dns as you''d expect) and we currently maintain them individually. They all log to a central syslog server over an openvpn interface, but aside from that they tend to be in different locations. Could puppet be any

I saw this feature became available in 2.7.0rc1 and wanted to try it out. I entered ''allow_duplicate_certs = true'' on both my master and agent systems in the puppet.conf (not sure if its need in both, saw it in genconf for puppetd and puppetmasterd though ...). I also have autosign.conf configured to allow autosigning for our domain (*.domain.com). I had my agent register with

asterisk-users-request@lists.digium.com wrote: > Send asterisk-users mailing list submissions to > asterisk-users@lists.digium.com > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > asterisk-users-request@lists.digium.com > >

asterisk-users-request@lists.digium.com wrote: >Send Asterisk-Users mailing list submissions to > asterisk-users@lists.digium.com > >To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users >or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > asterisk-users-request@lists.digium.com > >You can

C:\Users\ml623>puppet --version 2.7.7 Puppet complains about a package resource I am trying to use saying: Invalid parameter install_options The resource is defined as: package { "splunk": name => $gu_splunk::client::splunk_package, provider => ''msi'', ensure => installed, source =>

I''ve spent the last week or two poring over the documentation and setting up my first puppet environment, and while I''ve figured out how to do most of what I want to do with it, I have some questions that I haven''t been able to find answers for... * Can I match parts of a facter fact? In particular I have hostnames that include the environment as part of the

I'm wondering if moh is still broken in Asterisk 1.4 beta3. In Asterisk 1.2, when a callee put a caller on hold, the musiconhold class that was played was not the one the callee wanted the caller to hear, but something else. Even after using mohsuggest in Asterisk 1.4, it still appears that this is not working correctly. Here's the results of a simple test: CASE CALLER CALLEE

> -----Original Message----- > From: Tzafrir Cohen [mailto:tzafrir.cohen@xorcom.com] > Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 10:18 AM > To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com > Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Re: Meetme... No channel type registered > for'zap' > > > On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 10:06:02AM -0600, Douglas Garstang wrote: > > > -----Original

I don't follow. Are you saying there's a limit of 10 contexts within extensions.conf? If, on the other hand, your saying that each context can only have 10 #include statements, I tried that too. See below. I put 12 #include's across two contexts, and still got the same error, I not sure that goto's are much of a solution, but I'll have to proof it. And that's my

I have a SIP user, 2944093 that dialled 3254102. I'm trying to transfer the call from 3254102 to 3254104. When I try and transfer the call, I get the following on the Asterisk console. Mar 3 15:14:18 NOTICE[23124]: chan_sip.c:6731 get_refer_info: Supervised transfer requested, but unable to find callid '16749440-c28be02e-64b73be7@172.31.16.67'. Both legs must reside on Asterisk box

Thanks to this thread, we got it working too... but have a question... Once this is setup... does it stream forever, or does the stream only start when someone goes on hold/into a queue/etc? If it streams forever, at 24k... it looks like over 7GB/month in bandwidth... so we're not going to want to do that if a) it streams constantly and b) my math is correct. Thanks, Doug >

ast_waitfordigit that accepts milliseconds as input. Douglas Garstang wrote: > Admittedly I have not used the ExternalIVR app. Is it any good? > > I'm not sure I agree that Asterisk is GOOD for building IVR's. Sure, > it can do it, but boy it is UGLY. There's also the fact that you can't > call Backgound() in a macro, which forces you to use Read() which >

Yes, nice website. But, where's the documentation regarding setup and configuration? Where's the examples? -----Original Message----- From: Olle E Johansson [mailto:oej@edvina.net] Sent: Sat 3/11/2006 1:23 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Cc: Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Clustering / Dundi 11 mar 2006 kl. 07.54 skrev Douglas Garstang:

I just realised my problem seems to be related to bug 0003710 - "0003710: [patch] Consultative transfers between asterisk servers". It's unclear from the bug info if this problem has been resolved yet. Anyone know? Doug. > -----Original Message----- > From: Douglas Garstang > Sent: Monday, March 27, 2006 4:41 PM > To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial

> -----Original Message----- > From: Eric "ManxPower" Wieling [mailto:eric@fnords.org] > Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 5:11 PM > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk Sends 180-RINGING to UAeven > withprogressinband=yes > > > Douglas Garstang wrote: > > > > > > Andrew, >

Hmmm. Ok, that's true. At the very least it will create confusing CDR's I think... maybe. We're not billing our OnNet traffic at all. Only the traffic that goes OffNet, to our switch is billed (if it leaves our switch that is...). I was thinking earlier too that we only need progressinband on traffic that goes to the PSTN, via our switch. OnNet traffic will never generate reorder