similar to: Bind log question

good morning all, i have an interesting issue with browsing. details: i have three subnets. (subnet1, subnet2, and subnet3) i have a samba server on each subnet. (samba1, samba2, and samba3) i have a windows 2000 server on subnet1. (m$1) samba1 is the domain master and wins server with ip 192.168.0.1 win2k clients authenticate to their local server and wins is set to 192.168.0.1. when i run a

I am using tinc to connect together VPCs in AWS across multiple regions and accounts to provide secure communication. For the most part, it works great. A few times, I have seen issues where something got into an unstable state that didn't seem to resolve itself. Shutting down tinc on all hosts and restarting seemed to do the trick, but I'd like to see if there is something that I can

Hi there. Currently, our network design has two ISP lines and 3 subnets for LAN. Below are some details :- eth0 - isp1 eth1 - isp2 eth2 - subnet1 eth3 - subnet2 eth4 - subnet3 What i wanted to do is to assign incoming port 80 to our local squid server running on the firewall itself and assigned it to eth0(ISP1). I think it shouldnt be a problem as /etc/shorewall/rules provides a sample of the

Hi! I have a problem with samba, that I don't know if it's possible to solve. This is my network: <Subnet1>-Ethernet-<Gateway>-Ethernet-<Subnet2>-Internet Subnet1 is my own local network (bcast 192.168.1.255), Gateway is my own gateway machine (FreeBSD4.4, IPs: 192.168.1.1 and 193.13.35.101), Subnet2 is my neighbours (bcast 193.13.255.255). I can configure all

I have 1 100MB NIC with two 2MB-subnets trough a router behind it. I''d like to create multiple default classes: 1: + |\_ 1:10 default, ceiling 100000kbit, rate 96000kbit | |\_ 1:11 ceiling 2048kbit, rate 2048kbit | | | |\_1:110 ceiling 2048kbit, rate 1536kbit | \_1:111 ceiling 2048kbit, rate 512kbit (default subnet1) | \_ 1:12 ceiling 2048kbit, rate

Hi all, I would like to do something like this at Samba level: hosts allow = subnet1/mask1 subnet2/mask2 etc hosts deny = * But this doesn't seem to work (machine that are not in subnet1 and not in subnet2 still have access) I think the * is not understood by Samba, I tried ALL, this didn't work either. I'm gonna check the samba source code but if I could get an expert answer

I've got a pretty large lan at the moment and we are moving into a new office building next week. I'm looking at splitting the lan into seperate networks. At this stage I have one samba DC that does netlogon, roaming profiles etc for all clients. I'm not using LDAP with samba and won't be able to too soon as the change would be major. I have a ldap server used for qmail /

hi list, this is my first posting in the list here. At the moment I am reading the Advanced Traffic..... How-To. perhaps some one can tell me how to realize my idea. We have a data-server which is used by different subnets in our company. now I want wo put a linux-box in front the dataserver which control traffic usage to the different subnet´s. is it possible to do this transparent and

A number of you are flailing around trying to get the subject combination to work. You should all be aware that there are parts of this that don''t currently work and that won''t work well until there are enhancements made to Shorewall (and probably to Netfilter). I. There is no clean way currently to support Road Warriors from a Masquerading Netfilter firewall/gateway. As

Hi, I am configuring a network with two subnets with a different workgroup in each subnet. My aim is to have users being able to view and access shares on both workgroups. I have a Samba server in each subnet/workgroup, configured as both the domain and local master for each workgroup. Each server is also the WINS server for its subnet. The setup is like this: Subnet1: network -

Greetings, I just received some netweb-301 phones frm Seshu down in NJ. I cannot for the life of me get it to register with the asterisk server, nor upgrade the firmware to the latest (1.41) i'm still using 1.37. The packets are traversing the router, going into the other subnet, hitting the asterisk box, but not actually making it to asterisk. Nothing in the asterisk logs, but tcpdump

Hello Kevin, We have a  Samba/Windows20008R2 domain that's been running a few years now. Here are the details: * clients auth with SSSD (ldap, kerberos, ldap_schema=rfc2307bis) * idmap * samba on clients/server for joining domain We have scripts that automatically create users with UnixHomeDir, UID and GUID numbers within AD. I don't know about using WInbind...  I dropped that

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, I''m trying to setup a central IPSEC-Gateway with several ipsec tunnels. Some are to be routed over one leased line, some over the other leased line. Both leased lines have their own public ip adress. The setup looks kinda like this: eth1(ipsec0)--ISP0--Internet--eth1-Linux1-eth0--Subnet1 /

> > Message: 24 > Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 03:53:55 -0400 > From: "John" <jses27 at gmail.com> > Subject: RE: [CentOS] OT: Setting a CentOS to gateway a private IP > address > To: "'CentOS mailing list'" <centos at centos.org> > Message-ID: <86C552A83B964E6499972CEAD4610189 at ethan27> > Content-Type: text/plain;

All: I'm posting this to FreeBSD-security (rather than FreeBSD-net) because the problems I'm seeing appear to have been caused by spyware, and because they constitute a possible avenue for denial of service on FreeBSD machines with default installs of the operating system. Several of the FreeBSD machines on our network began to act strangely during the past week. Some have started to

I started with one dc, 'dc1', running samba v4.0.21, in subnet1. I successfully added two more dc's, 'dc2' and 'dc3', both running samba v4.0.24, both in subnet2. There are several firewalls between subnets 1 & 2. I continued to make firewall holes on behalf of msad after I added dc's 2 & 3. I.e. when they were added, there were patterns of communication

Yes, all these work here also (! With bind9_dlz ) nslookup nasa.org $(hostname -i) ( running the command on the DC itself.) nslookup nasa.org 1.1.1.1 nslookup nasa.org 8.8.8.8 Old samba version without the root zone provisioned maybe? That is an old bug. Which samba version is this? Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at

Hi Louis, I'm going to update OS version following? your and Rowland's hint. Thank you Andrea Il 15/07/20 08:57, L.P.H. van Belle via samba ha scritto: > Yes, i believe you hitted "not" having the "root zone" in internal DNS. > If i recall correctly its somewhere in 4.4. or 4.5 fix. > > But as Rowland said, i suggest also upgrading. > > ps other fix

Hi Louis, root at dc:~# samba -V Version 4.3.11-Ubuntu Andrea Il 14/07/20 13:55, L.P.H. van Belle via samba ha scritto: > Yes, all these work here also (! With bind9_dlz ) > > nslookup nasa.org $(hostname -i) ( running the command on the DC itself.) > nslookup nasa.org 1.1.1.1 > nslookup nasa.org 8.8.8.8 > > Old samba version without the root zone provisioned maybe? >

Yes, i believe you hitted "not" having the "root zone" in internal DNS. If i recall correctly its somewhere in 4.4. or 4.5 fix. But as Rowland said, i suggest also upgrading. ps other fix is, switch to bind9_DLZ But again i still advice to upgrade. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens