similar to: dependency loops ???

Hi I am using puppet to mirror a directory of files, if any of these change then processes need to be restarted. class snort { package { ["snort", "perl-Archive-Tar", "barnyard2", "perl-libwww-perl", "perl- Crypt-SSLeay"]: ensure => present; } # package user{ "snort": managehome => true,

I am trying to import a hash definition from a separate file but this fails whereas including the text verbatim in the original manifest works fine: class monitor ($master, $interface) { # import "masters.pp" $sensor_rule_categories = { ''dmzo'' => [scan,finger,ftp,telnet,rpc,rservices,ddos,dns,tftp,web- coldfusion,misc,web-php,x11,attack-responses,

Hi All, I am adding ip_queue module for snort inline IDS. I am using snort2.4.0 And iptables-1.3.4. Userspace Queuing(queue target) is enabled. It is built-in and not built as a module. The output of /proc/net/ip_queue is shown below: cat /proc/net/ip_queue> Peer PID : 0 Copy mode : 0 Copy range : 0 Queue length : 0 Queue max. length : 1024 IPTABLES 1.3.4 is

I figured that someone reading this list might want to take a look at the proceeding, considering that the version of Snort in FreeBSD ports -is- affected. -----Forwarded Message----- > From: CERT Advisory <cert-advisory@cert.org> > To: cert-advisory@cert.org > Subject: CERT Advisory CA-2003-13 Multiple Vulnerabilities in Snort Preprocessors > Date: 17 Apr 2003 11:30:47 -0400

I made an atempt to run snort_inline and shorewall on the same system but I could not get snort to see the packets. Maybe someone with a little more iptables knowledge could tell me what I''m doing wrong or if its possible to have the systems setup so that it places packets that the firewall would allow into QUEUE. After setting up and starting shorewall I then issue the following

Dear all, I''m setting up a new gateway for a small network (under 30 users)Gw will host the following services:shorewalldnsproxy i''m considering installing snort.can i do so on the same exact box ? is there any security risk of doing so ? box would have 4 ISPs and two internal interfaces. Any recommendation about the optimal setup of snort and shorewall (or if you suggest

Hello all: I tried to install snort under /usr/ports/security and have some problems. with "make all", I checked every item on the menu but I got error messages: ////////////////////////////// laptop# make all ===> snort-2.8.1_1 is marked as broken: FLEXRESP2 patch file does not incorporate cleanly. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/security/snort.

hello list, i''ve set up shorewall and snort inline on a linux box. it works, but snort only sees traffic from new connections. and this is because shorewall automatically generates rules to accept established and related connections. how can i force shorewall to queue everything, so that snort can scan the hole traffic like in IDS mode. The setup i have now is really simple, just 2 zones

Plus I would like to let you know that it works like a charm. Snort can now see those packets. -----Original Message----- From: shorewall-users-bounces@lists.shorewall.net [mailto:shorewall-users-bounces@lists.shorewall.net] On Behalf Of Thibodeau, Jamie L. Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 9:25 AM To: Mailing List for Shorewall Users Subject: RE: [Shorewall-users] Shorewall and an inline

I am trying to use puppetlabs apache module on CentOS to install mod php package. class {''apache::mod::php'': } It returns error "Error: Could not find dependency Package[httpd] for A2mod[php5]". I am using Puppet 3.1 version. Do I need to call class{''apache'': } explicitly to get mod-php install working? If I try that as follows then it

SlashDot had an article today on a Linux server malware attack, <http://it.slashdot.org/story/14/03/18/2218237/malware-attack-infected-25000-linuxunix-servers>. I wonder if there is a simple test to see if a CentOS machine has been infected in this way? The article mentions Yara and Snort rules to test for this, but I wonder if there is something simpler? Alternatively, are there Yara or

Hello, I have created an ovs bridge on which i have attached a port. I would like to connect my vm to that port,so i have created an xml defining the network. The xml is: <network> <name>ovs-snort</name> <forward mode='bridge'/> <bridge name='snort'/> <virtualport type='openvswitch'/> </network> but when i do virsh

Question to the list, Has anyone here had experience using Shorewall (multi-isp configuration) with Snort inline? First, is this possible? Second, if anyone has done this, what documentation, if any did they use to set it up? Third, does snort have to run inline on a firewall (I''m under the impression it does)?

I've been prowling through the FreeBSD and Snort list archives in search of information on setting up snort on a FreeBSD bridge(4) that logs to a remote postgres box via a third interface (hme0) Snort is being started with the following command: /usr/local/bin/snort -A full -D -e -d -s -i fxp0 -c /usr /local/etc/snort.conf Where fxp0 and fxp1 are in the bridge output from sysctl:

You are awesome!!!! -----Original Message----- From: shorewall-users-bounces@lists.shorewall.net [mailto:shorewall-users-bounces@lists.shorewall.net] On Behalf Of Tom Eastep Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 9:11 AM To: Mailing List for Shorewall Users Subject: Re: [Shorewall-users] Shorewall and an inline IDS (snort-inlineorhogwash) Tom Eastep wrote: > Thibodeau, Jamie L. wrote: >

Is anyone using an inline IDS like hogwash or snort-inline to drop packets in a system running shoreline? I _think_ I see how to configure it, but I''d be really interested in finding a howto or something... Thanks! Mike- -- Mornings: Evolution in action. Only the grumpy will survive. -- Please note - Due to the intense volume of spam, we have installed site-wide spam filters at

Hi all, I need to monitor all traffic and block bad requests on my guest machines and also on my xen host. To accomplish this I think to install snort on my dom0 host (rhel5). Somebody have tried this? What about performance on guests?? Many thanks ... -- CL Martinez carlopmart {at} gmail {d0t} com _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list

Hi Everyone, Can anyone confirm if a xen based domU can be used for snort setup? It is not for commercial use, rather just SOHO use. Regards, dot.yet _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

Hi Everyone, Can anyone confirm if a xen based domU can be used for snort setup? It is not for commercial use, rather just SOHO use. Regards, dot.yet _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

I am trying to get the equivalent of promisc mode to pass all received traffic to a kvm guest that is running snort. So I have a cisco switch with span port plugged into eh2 on my kvm host which is centos. I want the kvm host to forward all promisc traffic from the span port to the guest running snort of tcpdump. What would be the best way to do this?