similar to: (Fwd) Linux autofs overflow in 2.0.36+

Hi all, I just had a panic with dovecot 1.1.6, two days after replacing 1.0.15 with it in production. Here are the logs immediately preceding the panic, I think they're related. It seems the user connected simultaneously from two different clients, from his own computer and a webmail running on the server, then manipulated mail folders on one side, and logged out. The panic occurred 3

Hello all, I'm having some issues configuring dovecot 1.0.10 on a Solaris 10 box, that uses LDAP?for its accounts. The local accounts (in /etc/passwd) are authenticated properly and work as expected, but all accounts from the LDAP fail authentication. Those are declared for the system using PAM and NSS (/etc/pam.conf and /etc/nsswitch.conf are configured accordingly). Currently, there are

[Mod: while not directly related to linux security, this post of course is approved because it provides a good summary and clear description. Please limit the discussion on this topic to new stuff. In general posts like this will be approved -- alex] Automating brute force attacks with ''Expect" balif and desslok - Abstract - phf,

Hello, Straight from the floor of Astricon 2004, I am happy to release my updated Asterisk 1.0 RPMS for RedHat 7.3 and RedHat 9.0 platform. Current Release --------------- asterisk-1.0-0 libpri-1.0-0 zaptel-1.0-0 kernel-module-zaptel-1.0-0 RedHat 7.3 ---------- ftp://ftp.nacs.net/asterisk/rh73/RPMS/ ftp://ftp.nacs.net/asterisk/rh73/SRPMS/ RedHat 9.0 ----------

Hello all, Per my last message to the list, and my promise to the Developers that I'd create RPMS if they released 0.7.0, I would like to announce the availability of experimental RPMS for Asterisk release 0.7.1. These are targeted at RedHat 7.3 systems, running the latest Kernel release (2.4.20-28.7). As the RPMS mature and people submit comments, changes, updates and patches, I will

Neo: What are you trying to tell me? That I can dodge bullets? Morpheus: No, Neo. I'm trying to tell you that when you're ready, you won't have to. There have been over 500 downloads of the RedHat Asterisk RPMS since they were released 2 weeks ago, and I have received many comments to improve them. After some late night hacking this weekend, I have dropped 0.7.1 release 4 RPMS at

Hello all, It's my birthday today, so as my present I would like everyone possible to download and test my updated set of RPMS for Asterisk 0.7.1. By popular request, I installed and built a set of RPMS for RedHat 9.0, and in the process fixed a bunch of issues from the initial build. I have also updated and will be maintaining a page on the Asterisk Wiki located at:

OK so I can mount a cd-rom drive off an NT box no problem, as in. I don't get any errors. here's what I do get. [root@intranet /root]# smbmount \\\\192.168.2.3\\cd-rom /mnt/cdrom/ Added interface ip=192.168.2.2 bcast=192.168.2.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 Session request failed (131,130) with myname=INTRANET destname=192.168.2.3 Called name not present Try to connect to another name (instead

Hello, Please be conscious of Digium's bandwidth and use a Mirror when downloading 1.0. I have mirrored the tarballs at: ftp://ftp.nacs.net/asterisk/ Direct links: ftp://ftp.nacs.net/asterisk/asterisk-1.0.0.tar.gz ftp://ftp.nacs.net/asterisk/asterisk-sounds-1.0.0.tar.gz ftp://ftp.nacs.net/asterisk/libpri-1.0.0.tar.gz -- Vice President of N2Net, a New Age Consulting Service, Inc.

Hello all, Hot on the announcement this morning by Mark, I have updated and rebuilt new Asterisk RPMS for RedHat 7.3, 8, 9 and Fedora Core 1. Please feel free to install these and beat them up. The usual disclaimer applies.. These haven't been tested, not reccomended for production use, don't bug Digium for support of these, blah blah blah.... You can find the updated RPMS and Source

I'm trying to switch to using rsync for updating a huge software library containing binaries, text files, symlinks, and so on. We've been using something homegrown which I'm not that happy with - it's a perl script that systems cp and chmod and such. The problem I'm seeing is: target computer: directories ctime-5 and ctime-5b3 are distinct directories source computer:

On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 4:00 PM, Gregory Boehnlein <damin at nacs.net> wrote: > Hello, > Is anyone running Asterisk 1.4 w/ RFC2833 to Level3's SONUS network? > We are unable to get reliable RFC 2833 DTMF working, and have instead had to > use G711ULAW w/ INBAND DTMF to get around the issue. Looks like an issue on > the SONUS side. > > Anyone else have this

Hello all, I spent a little time in the wilderness and when I came back to civilization, I found out that new Libpri, Zaptel and Asterisk archives were available on ftp.digium.com. As a result, I've updated my Asterisk RPMS for RedHat and made them available for public consumption. Because of several issues with Fedora Core 2 and the 2.6 kernel, I am going to wait before I even start

I configured dovecot on a Fedora Core 2 system - the version that comes with FC2. I was using it with a RHEL 3 NFS server. Dovecot would again and again get stuck trying to grab an fcntl lock, even though I specified that it should only use dotlocks in dovecot.conf. Sometimes it would segfault (leaving things locked?). Often there would be two dovecot imapd processes for the same user.

Is there any way of increasing rsync's block transfer size for when you need to transfer data from one filesystem to another on the same disk? Using a large blocksize tends to decrease track to track seeks. If I put a large dd or something in between two tar's in such a situation, I see over double the throughput on an AIX system (1M vs 64K). Thanks. -- Dan Stromberg DCS/NACS/UCI

We've been using this version of rsync: rsync version 2.6.2 protocol version 28 Copyright (C) 1996-2004 by Andrew Tridgell and others <http://rsync.samba.org/> Capabilities: 64-bit files, socketpairs, hard links, symlinks, batchfiles, no IPv6, 64-bit system inums, 64-bit internal inums ...with these options: /usr/local/bin/rsync -a --stats --progress --block-size

Hello. I know that it is recommended to run smbd as a standalone daemon and to avoid inetd. Can you please tell me why inetd is discouraged and what problems it imposes? Also, I have one user who is having problems accessing her personal files on a MacOSX 10.3.2 via smb. Any ideas what may be causing it? Judy Lin NACS-DCS

Hi - I think I might have seen this problem on the list before, so I'm sorry if this is a duplicate, but I couldn't find it when searching through the archive.... I'm just setting up a new machine with asterisk. It's a RH9 box, and I've tried the RC2 tarball, the 1.0 CVS and the 1.0 RPM's from nacs.net (thanks). My config is basically the sample barebones sip setup

We're hoping to switch to updating a large software collection with rsync. Sometimes, we'll be using rsync to push security updates, say for setuid binaries with a security hole. In this case, we want rsync to get rid of the old executable, instead of creating a ~ file or whatever. Sometimes, we'll be using rsync to push updates to programs that people want to leave running a long

Hi All, I must not understand the uid/gid line in rsyncd.conf. If someone could briefly point out where I've gone wrong, I'd appreciate it. I've created a special user to backup a server which has some users who don't want all their files backed up, so I'm trying to address their concerns by using the uid= and gid= lines in rsyncd.conf to have the rsyncd run with