similar to: netstat/ipcs inside jail

Hi, Is anyone here using the "Network Connect" VPN software from Pulse Secure (which was previously known as Juniper Networks Network Connect)? I've used this successfully in the past to connect to the machines at work from home. That was with CentOS 6, though, on CentOS 7 I can't seem to get it to work. The software actually starts, and it also successfully sets up a

Hi all, I try to receive an ipv6 address for my PPP link via autoconf (against Cisco machine), but there is a problem I'm unable to solve so far. I can see cisco's Router-Advertisement containing prefix etc., but no IP adress is assigned to tun0 interface. Anyone succesful in IPv6 over dial-up PPP connection? When I manually assign IPv6 address, connection works. My system is

I recently reconfigured a box running FreeBSD 5.3 with Samba v. 3.0.7 running as PDC. It was servicing 2 networks, processing logons for 192.168.200.0/24 and 192.168.115.0/24. The reason for 2 networks was security, 115.0/24 had some stuff on it that the users on 200.0/24 shouldn't have access to. Before the reconfiguration, the system was working 100%. To make everything better I flattened

Hello Am Friday 11 December 2015, 10:13:00 schrieb Gordon Messmer: > On 12/11/2015 06:04 AM, G?nther J. Niederwimmer wrote: > > I have 4 NIC on all my KVM Servers but the most time on a start (restart) > > I > > lost one NIC? It is not always the same, but this two are virtio NICs. > > > > with ifup eth0(1) the system say,I have no configured eth0 or eth1 file ?

the dig is wrong as well, it adds an additional ip address, which i have not request to use other interfaces: root at server:/# dig p3x-dc.patrikx3.com ; <<>> DiG 9.11.5-P4-5.1-Debian <<>> p3x-dc.patrikx3.com ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 11190 ;; flags: qr aa rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 2, AUTHORITY: 0,

sorry i mean dnsupdate, if i use bind9 with samba dlz dnsupdate does not work, so i have to leave it out. my problem is that i got 2 interfaces and still it 2 dual stack ip addresses, the 192.168.78.0/24 is correct. the 192.168.81.0/24 is giving 192.168.81.120 instead of 192.168.81.20. i found the whole root since "/" with grep there is no 192.168.81.120 at all. only in my router there

samba generates an unknown ip4 and ip6 address. here is my settings: root at server:/# ifconfig enp1s0f2: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 inet 192.168.81.20 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.81.255 inet6 fe80::21b:21ff:fea6:ce92 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20<link> inet6 2001:470:1f1b:5b5:21b:21ff:fea6:ce92 prefixlen 64 scopeid

Hi there, I've installed a new KVM-Server. The routing in all instances are only working after "arp -s ip_of_router mac_of_router" Server: CentOS7, KVM Clients: CentOS6 and Fedora 21 What going wrong? [root at bgstkvmlr01 ~]# ifconfig bond0: flags=5187<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MASTER,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 inet6 fe80::3ed9:2bff:fe0b:c706 prefixlen 64 scopeid

Hi there. This is with regards to samba-3.0.23c, on FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE-p12 Previously I had Samba up and running without any problems. Then I decided to do a tiny upgrade by simply switching to a new motherboard, while keeping all other hardware and software aspects the same. However, after the upgrade, netbios name resolution seems to have stopped working somehow. \\servername lookups no

I have Apache/2.4.6 installed in a minimal CentOS 7 VM. I am trying to access the default page when Apache is installed by accessing the CentOS IP as http://192.168.3.130 (is a host only interface) but I got "This webpage is not available: ERR_CONNECTION_TIMED_OUT" and I can't find why. I have stopped iptables and then checked: # service iptables status Redirecting to /bin/systemctl

Laine I made the change and I can now ping across both bridges: br1 (192.168.0.0/24) and br1600 (192.168.1.0/24): br1: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST>  mtu 1500         inet 192.168.0.110  netmask 255.255.255.0  broadcast 192.168.0.255         inet6 fe80::1e98:ecff:fe1b:276d  prefixlen 64  scopeid 0x20<link>         ether 1c:98:ec:1b:27:6d  txqueuelen 1000  (Ethernet)

Hi there, I'm playing with CentOS 7 (don't know if it's recommended at all have this one as a development server as maybe is not stable enough yet) and I installed it on a Vmware VM with two network interfaces: one as a bridged connected directly to the physical network and replicating the network state and the second one as a host only interface (the one I use to manage the VM) so

I am attempting to setup an IPSec protected GRE tunnel with a Cisco router. I believe the IPSec association is up, however I cannot move traffic over the tunnel. It is not clear how to integrate the tunnel interface (gre1) with firewall-cmd; adding the interface to trusted does not appear to 'stick'. [root at aqueduct ~]# firewall-cmd --add-interface=gre1 --zone=trusted The interface

Hey, I have KVM installed on my Fedora 17 box. I added the network interfaces of the virtual machines to the openvswitch bridge as follows: ____ ____ / VM1\______br0_______/ em1\ \____/ | \____/ | _|_ /VM2\ \____/ virbr0 is the virtual network switch VM1 and VM2 are on the same subnet having tap interfaces vnet0 and vnet1 respectively. em1 is the default

I have just checked the Openbsd box on the if interface. fxp0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 address: 00:02:55:30:54:28 media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX full-duplex) status: active inet 192.168.1.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255 inet6 fe80::202:55ff:fe30:5428%fxp0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 xl0:

Hi, Thanks for helping. Answers in line : Hi, I want to use samba as AD. everything seemed to be ok so far with the install and the config. STATUS=daemon 'smbd' finished starting up and ready to serve connections Feb 27 10:34:03 ip-1XX winbindd[22083]: [2020/02/27 10:34:03.002858, 0] ../lib/util/become_daemon.c:124(daemon_ready) Feb 27 10:34:03 ip-1XX winbindd[22083]:

On 12/09/2013 05:14 AM, scar wrote: > hello i have a server colocated in a datacenter with several external IP > addresses available to use. the physical server is using one of these > IPs, and i want to assign another, unused IP to the virtual machine. i > thought i could just do this by editing the container's > /etc/network/interfaces, setting a static IP address for eth0

Even more puzzling, I reverted back to the old configuration to confirm what I had seen and found that it works in one direction but not the other: i.e. from 192.168.0.110 to 192.168.0.120, but not the other way around. Must be something with my configuration....which I can follow up on. So, thanks again for your help. Richard On 12/3/19 11:36 AM, Richard Achmatowicz wrote: > Laine >

Greetings, I'm attempting to get several virtual machines setup on a Fedora19 host system, with the traditional bridge network devices (br0, br1, etc). I've done this many times before with older versions of Fedora (16, 14, etc), and it just works. However, for reasons that I cannot figure out, the bridge doesn't seem to be working in Fedora19. While I can successfully connect to

Am 22.06.2020 um 22:12 schrieb Marek Greško: Hi Marek > Would you mind repeating the test with canreinvite=no set for all you > phones and mobile phones? All my peers have already canreinvite=no... I only have canreinvite=yes on the SIP configuration on the Telekom part: [pbxluca] type=peer defaultuser=111111111 at t-online.de secret= xxxxxxxxxx dtmfmode=rfc2833 host=tel.t-online.de