similar to: All "GNU" software potentially Trojaned

I figured that someone reading this list might want to take a look at the proceeding, considering that the version of Snort in FreeBSD ports -is- affected. -----Forwarded Message----- > From: CERT Advisory <cert-advisory@cert.org> > To: cert-advisory@cert.org > Subject: CERT Advisory CA-2003-13 Multiple Vulnerabilities in Snort Preprocessors > Date: 17 Apr 2003 11:30:47 -0400

The following advisory was issued by CERT yesterday. Because it affects FreeBSD systems as well, we are forwarding it to the appropriate FreeBSD mailing lists. We would like to thanks CERT for cooperation with the FreeBSD security officer on this subject. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- CERT Advisory CA-98-13-tcp-denial-of-service Original Issue Date: December 21, 1998 Last Revised

For those who are unaware... [mod: This whole bind affair has gone a bit out of hand. Elias from Bugtraq found "public" info indicating the problem. ISC/CERT were working on releasing the bugfix together with the fix. Now everybody is scurrying to get fixes out now that "the public" knows about this. As far as I know, Red Hat (& Caldera) made a new RPM, based on the most

-------- Is this old? I couldn''t find it in the linux-security archives. If so, please disregard. Dan ------- Forwarded Message Return-Path: cppm_reg_sysadmins-owner@fnal.gov Received: from FNAL.FNAL.Gov (fnal.fnal.gov [131.225.9.8]) by sapphire.fnal.gov (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA27322 for <yocum@sapphire.fnal.gov>; Tue, 13 Oct 1998 11:12:23 -0500 Received: from raven

>Date: Tue, 11 Aug 1998 13:21:06 -0400 >From: CERT Advisory <cert-advisory@cert.org> >To: cert-advisory@coal.cert.org >Subject: CERT Advisory CA-98.10 - mime_buffer_overflows >Reply-To: cert-advisory-request@cert.org >Organization: CERT(sm) Coordination Center - +1 412-268-7090 > >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >

Adding this SHA256 code made me read the BSD license once again. It says: * 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright * notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the * documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution. Then there are a few files from Cyrus as well which contain: * 4. Redistributions of any form

I'm in the UK and have had terrible trouble getting the right contract. After looking on voip-info I set off looking for a vendor only to find that no-one sells the $9 contract. Cisco retracted that one :-( I asked for the equivalent and they said I needed a ?20 contract. I said fine but after 20 minutes or so got a call saying I couldn't have that one as it didn't give me access

On Sep 18, 2012, at 5:46 PM, Bradley M. Kuhn <bkuhn at sfconservancy.org> wrote: > I'm sorry for the intrusion of a project policy discussion onto the > developer list, but there may be many here who may have thoughts, input, > or question regarding Conservancy's offer for LLVM's membership, > discussed below. If you're not interested in that topic, please feel

Hi Bradley, Yes, I experienced quite a lot of echo with my IAXy, until I switched analog handsets - in my case, it was severe acoustic coupling in a cheap handset. Regards, -- Anthony Rodgers Business Systems Analyst District of North Vancouver Web: http://www.dnv.org RSS Feed: http://www.dnv.org/rss.asp On Mar 7, 2006, at 11:38 AM, Bradley M. Kuhn wrote: > I just purchased an IAXy

Attached is a zlib advisory and a debug dump of ssh with compression enabled. Most of the debug is superflous, so I have underlined the two points to look at. When creating an ssh connection, compression on the line is done *before* authentication -- This means an unauthorized attacker could, conceivable, leverage root access by connecting with to the ssh server requesting zlib compression and

"Bradley M. Kuhn" <bkuhn at sfconservancy.org> writes: > I'm sorry for the intrusion of a project policy discussion onto the > developer list, but there may be many here who may have thoughts, input, > or question regarding Conservancy's offer for LLVM's membership, > discussed below. If you're not interested in that topic, please feel > free to

I have a set of OGG files, and the person who encoding them didn't put an author and title on the files. Is there any way to add this information other than decoding it to .wav's again and encoding it again? Thanks for your help. -- Bradley M. Kuhn - http://www.ebb.org/bkuhn --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/

On Sep 19, 2012, at 10:14 AM, dag at cray.com wrote: > "Bradley M. Kuhn" <bkuhn at sfconservancy.org> writes: >> I'm sorry for the intrusion of a project policy discussion onto the >> developer list, but there may be many here who may have thoughts, input, >> or question regarding Conservancy's offer for LLVM's membership, >> discussed below.

CDW is not a Gold Cisco partner. I would talk with a group called Shore Group http://www.shoregroup.com I know they do a lot of Cisco VoIP work and can sell you a SmartNet contract no problem. Cheers Ryan -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Bradley M. Kuhn Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2005 2:41

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- ============================================================================= CERT(sm) Advisory CA-96.21 Original issue date: September 19, 1996 Last revised: -- Topic: TCP SYN Flooding and IP Spoofing Attacks - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- *** This advisory supersedes CA-95:01. *** Two

I a PhD student here at Carnegie Mellon. I have ten years of experience working in C in industry. I am working on a research project here at Carnegie Mellon that needs to integrate a database with mail clients. We are planning to use the IMAP protocol to communicate with the mail client. After I spent some time looking at the code of various IMAP server implementations, I got very interested in

Is there a way to force certain formula parameters to be nonnegative? What I want to do is to estimate student capacity over time, namely by > capacity ~ Student + Student:Day I add this formula to a glm call and obtain negative learning slope estimates (Student:Day) in some cases. However, I don't want to allow for that. In such a case, glm should solve > capacity ~ Student and

Hey everyone, What am I doing wrong? I loaded the MASS package with library(MASS), and now when I type library() I get > library() Packages in library `F:\r\rw0651/library': MASS Main Library of Venables and Ripley's MASS base The R base package . . . That's fine. The problem is that when I try to use a function that I know is built

Hi folks: Does anyone know of a way to do (linear) hypothesis tests of parameters after fitting a maximum-likelihood model w/ optim? I can't seem to find anything like a Wald test whose documentation says it applies to optim output. Also, thanks again to everyone who gave me feedback on the robustness of ML estimation in R! Peter ********************************

Hi, I hope this is the right list for my posting, since I've never posted to any R list before. I'm quite extensively using the xfig graphics device and as far as I figured out this device writes all the objects into xfig layer 100 (based on what I saw in the devPS.c file -if this is the file to output to xfig format - depth 100 is hardcoded). Are the any plans to implement xfig layer