similar to: is one of my hosts a scanner?

On 9/24/2016 7:20 AM, Alex Bradbury wrote: > My concern is that all of the above adds yet more complexity to what > is already (in my view) a fairly difficult part of LLVM to understand. > The definition of MyRegisterClass is not so bad though, and perhaps it > doesn't matter how it works under the hood to the average backend > writer. I agree with the complexity, but I would

I have posted a patch that switches the API to one that supports this (yet non-existent functionality) earlier: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24631 The comments from that were incorporated into the following RFC. Motivation: Certain targets feature "variable-sized" registers, i.e. a situation where the register size can be configured by a hardware switch. A common instruction set

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=616 Summary: Duplicate rules for multi-homed hostnames. IPv4 and IPv6 inconsistent treatment. Product: iptables Version: unspecified Platform: i386 OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P4 Component: iptables

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=616 --- Comment #8 from Phil Oester <netfilter at linuxace.com> 2013-07-09 15:56:45 CEST --- (In reply to comment #7) > It is the duty of the software to properly execute that policy. Here, the > software fails to do so because it produces duplicate redundant rules which are > never used. And where is it documented that the software

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2703 Bug ID: 2703 Summary: Incorrect message during installation on Windows. Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.8.1p1 Hardware: ix86 OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P5 Component: Miscellaneous Assignee:

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2466 Bug ID: 2466 Summary: Cipher defines from opensslconf.h Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 7.1p1 Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 Component: Miscellaneous Assignee: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org

Hi, I''ve setup a gateway using multiple default gateways and netfilter MASQUERADE to load balance traffic between two DSL interfaces and one dedicated link, and when I try to download something big, or when I''m using MSN (both in clients under this gateway), sometimes, or most times, after a while the connection timeouts. The connection doesn''t seem to change its

Hi Alex: I was looking at an ia64 bug report and noticed that we don''t actually free IRQs in the free_irq_vector hypercall. This would eventually lead to alloc_irq_vector failing. Unless I''m mistaken something like calling pci_disable_device and pci_enable_device can lead to this situation. So I''m wondering what the original problem was and how could we resolve it

This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1087785732-11892-7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit ******************************** IMPORTANT: This informational message was sent from an unattended mailbox. Do not respond directly to this message. Please read it in its entirety for ways you can

Hi Quentin, >> Yes, the dags in view-isel-dags and view-legalize-types-dags are correct (the add operations are here and are their results are used) and the dags are the same. > > And what about view-sched-dags? The DAG looks like I described below (*) > This one should give you what has been selected. So if this is not correct, you have indeed a problem in the selection

pulling my hair out... If I rm -fr /root/.spamassassin/* then sa-learn a bunch of messages, it works... ]# sa-learn --dump magic 0.000 0 3 0 non-token data: bayes db version 0.000 0 3997 0 non-token data: nspam 0.000 0 0 0 non-token data: nham 0.000 0 202022 0 non-token data: ntokens 0.000

If someone has some free time, can you go over my ipfw config. See if I have any problems, or things i should add. Im not an ipfw expert or anything. Here is the config. add 100 allow all from any to any via lo0 add 110 deny log all from any to 127.0.0.0/8 add 120 deny log ip from 127.0.0.0/8 to any add 00200 check-state add 00250 deny all from any to any frag in via bge0 add 00260 deny

Gordon Henriksen wrote: > On 2008-06-11, at 13:16, Gary Benson wrote: > > Duncan Sands wrote: > > > Can you please attach IR which can be compiled to an executable > > > (and shows the problem). > > > > I've been generating functions using a builder and then compiling > > them with ExecutionEngine::getPointerToFunction(). Is there some > >

On 2008-06-11, at 13:16, Gary Benson wrote: > Duncan Sands wrote: > >> Can you please attach IR which can be compiled to an executable >> (and shows the problem). > > I've been generating functions using a builder and then compiling > them with ExecutionEngine::getPointerToFunction(). Is there some way > I can get compilable IR from that?

Duncan Sands wrote: > Can you please attach IR which can be compiled > to an executable (and shows the problem). I've been generating functions using a builder and then compiling them with ExecutionEngine::getPointerToFunction(). Is there some way I can get compilable IR from that? Cheers, Gary -- http://gbenson.net/

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=616 --- Comment #4 from Phil Oester <netfilter at linuxace.com> 2013-07-08 23:33:07 CEST --- As noted, #2 is solved already. Also, /128 will no longer print (commit 945353a2). But your #1 makes little sense to me: discovery.razor.cloudmark.com/22. How do you know that EVERY IP returned from a DNS lookup is always going to be a /22 mask?

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=616 --- Comment #6 from Phil Oester <netfilter at linuxace.com> 2013-07-09 03:50:27 CEST --- Yes, I fully understand what is happening in the one specific example you have provided. However you need to answer what happens if Cloudmark suddenly decides to add an IP _OUTSIDE_ of that /22 that is assigned to them. Let's say they open a new

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=616 Phil Oester <netfilter at linuxace.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #10 from Phil Oester

I was spamassassin update spamassassin.i386 0:3.2.0-1.el4.rf Complete! and then,Require Perl-Package installed [30998] dbg: diag: module not installed: Mail::SPF ('require' failed) [30998] dbg: diag: module installed: Mail::SPF::Query, version 1.999001 [30998] dbg: diag: module installed: IP::Country::Fast, version 604.001 [30998] dbg: diag: module installed: Razor2::Client::Agent,

Somebody knock where i change name?s User-Agent Thank?s -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/ms-tnef Size: 2703 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20060424/3684c52f/attachment.bin