similar to: Fwd: Not receiving real data from a Eaton E series DX 1000H UPS

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 20000 matches similar to: "Fwd: Not receiving real data from a Eaton E series DX 1000H UPS"

2013 Apr 18
4
Not receiving real data from a Eaton E series DX 1000H UPS
UPS: http://www.eaton.com/Eaton/ESeriesUPS/DXUPS/index.htm?wtredirect=www.eaton.com/DXUPS I have the same problem on two different computers. The first one is running Ubuntu 12.10 i386 , the second one is running Debian 6.0 x64. Both of them are updated. I tried using different serial cable but the result is the same. The connection to the ups using Windows 7 and Winpower is working fine on
2005 Dec 19
1
MGE Pulsar ES 8+
Hi! I have a MGE Pulsar ES 8+ UPS. Here is the response of some commands: - Si --> 3000 44 0 - Si 1 --> Pulsar ES8+ 0 - Ai --> 5 0 It's not recognized very well by the current (from CVS) mge-utalk driver: [root@srv01 ~]# /home/rog/src/nut/drivers/mge-utalk -i 20 -DDD -u root /dev/ttyS0 Network UPS Tools - MGE UPS SYSTEMS/U-Talk driver 0.86 (2.1.0) debug level is '3'
2009 Aug 02
1
MGE Evolution mge-utalk Driver Not Connected error
Hi All, I have an mge pulsar esv 14+ rackmount UPS connected via straight through serial cable to a USB to serial adaptor (My motherboard does not have a native RS232 port). I am running Ubuntu Server 9.04 x64, and nut 2.4.1-2ubuntu4 installed via APT. I am getting the error: Poll UPS [ups1 at localhost] failed - Driver not connected My conf files: (ups.conf) [ups1] driver=mge-utalk
2010 Feb 08
1
megatec and blazer drivers for (brand)Tuncmatik (series)Newtech Pro 1KVA
Hi, I would like to report that Tuncmatik Newtech Pro 1 KVA (http://www.tuncmatik.com/en-US/productDetail.asp?RecID=290) works with nut(2.4.1) blazer_usb, blazer_ser and megatec drivers. The UPS came with an usb cable and a java based software for both linux and windows, named ViewPower (http://www-power-software-download.com). This UPS has double interface a USB interface and a serial
2006 Jul 24
1
Problems with MGE ESV 8+ and NUT 2.0.3
Hello, I recently had a failure with my old MGE ESV8 ups, it just died on me so I had to get a new one. I found a MGE ESV8+ cheap and everything seems to work fine with it except the communication with the computer. The old ESV8 (non +) worked fine with NUT after applying some patches I got from the mailing list, but I think they are in the source tree now. I'm using the same cable that
2010 May 16
1
MGE-UTALK regression since nut-server-2.2.2
Hi all ! I have communication issues between my station and my old Pulsar EX10 UPS, (U-Talk) connected by RS232, when using v2.4.1 of nut-server. I tried to come back to version 2.2.2 and then, communication start and is operational. Maybe it's linked to bug 498655, but i haven't seen any answer ? http://www.mail-archive.com/debian-bugs-dist at lists.debian.org/msg566711.html Here are
2006 May 07
0
updateinfo and stale data
Hi, FreeBSD 5.4, NUT from ports (2.0.3), serial on /dev/cuaa1, Ellipse 1200 USBS. I set the ups.conf up as : [ellipse] driver=mge-utalk port=/dev/cuaa1 desc="Ellipse" When I go to start it I get : Network UPS Tools - UPS driver controller 2.0.3 Network UPS Tools - MGE UPS SYSTEMS/U-Talk driver 0.87 (2.0.3) Could not get multiplier table: using raw
2006 May 08
1
How do I resolve comm issues
Hi, I'm running into an issue while using FreeBSD 5.4, NUT from ports (2.0.3), serial on /dev/cuaa1, Ellipse 1200 USBS. The ups.conf is : [ellipse] driver=mge-utalk port=/dev/cuaa1 desc="Telecom Closet Ellipse" When I go to start it I get : Network UPS Tools - UPS driver controller 2.0.3 Network UPS Tools - MGE UPS SYSTEMS/U-Talk driver 0.87 (2.0.3)
2005 Oct 07
1
Problem with new version
Ah, the perils of auto-upgrades. Last night, Fedora Core 3 upgraded my perfectly working nut installation to 2.0.2. I was informed of that because every xterm in the house (about 8 over a Linux box, two laptops and a G4 server) started beeping at 3:20am and didn't stop until I shut down nut. Keep in mind this configuration has been working for about two years. Here's the messages I get
2005 Sep 29
1
not all Variables are supported
Hello, I have a MGE Comet S31. I installed nut for Debian/Sarge and configured the mge-utalk protocol. I get the following syslog messages Sep 28 11:10:41 neckarsulm upsmon[25505]: Poll UPS [comet@mastermind] failed - Variable not supported by UPS Sep 28 11:10:46 neckarsulm mge-utalk[25284]: updateinfo: Cannot update ups.temperature Sep 28 11:10:46 neckarsulm mge-utalk[25284]: updateinfo: Cannot
2013 Apr 02
3
blazer driver: Possible bugs with battery packs
Hello all, long time away from this list, glad to be around again! I have this Powercom Vanguard VGN VGD-20K31. Some details of this model: * 3-phase input, single phase output * Model has 240V / 12V9AH x 20 x 2SET, plus another set of 20 batteries. All in all, 3 sets * Serial connection to Windows 2k3 server with UPSMon Now I was strongly considering replacing the bundled no-good upsmoon
2012 Oct 08
1
mge-utalk ESV8+ comm problem
Dear Sirs, I have an old but very well-working UPS MGE Pulsar ESV8+ Rack. I'd like to use it to power FreeBSD 9.0-Rel server. Of fortunately I have problem with recommended driver - mge-utalk, nut 2.6.4 (installed from FreeBSD Ports). I get messages: Could not get multiplier table: using raw readings. and updateinfo: Cannot update system status I saw similar thread on mailing list with no
2017 Jan 13
1
yum --security check-update
Hi all, Does anyone know why when I run the following command, I get thousands of packages in the output, saying they've been excluded? [root at server yum.repos.d]# yum --security check-update | less Loaded plugins: fastestmirror Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * base: mirror.removed.com * epel: mirror.removed.com * extras: mirror.removed.com * updates: mirror.removed.com
2020 Jun 21
2
Server did not shut down
2013 Sep 03
1
[PATCH v2] tftp-hpa: add error check for disk filled up
From: "Roy.Li" <rongqing.li at windriver.com> Add error check when write file, the caller can detect if the disk filled up (or had an i/o error) and return a NOSAPCE nak to the other side. Signed-off-by: Ming Liu <ming.liu at windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Roy.Li <rongqing.li at windriver.com> --- common/tftpsubs.c | 4 +++- tftpd/tftpd.c | 12 ++++++++++-- 2
2018 Jul 31
0
Adding drivers to NUT?
Dear Daniele, I have some news regarding the Driver: I applied the patch you sent me (https://github.com/zykh/nut/tree/issue-441) and it works correctly (obviously in Level 5 of Debug I see "missing CR...etc.."). As for now there are 2 modification I'd like to suggest you: - For Online Type UPSs the Megatec protocol describes that the battery voltage is provided in the form of V
2013 Aug 22
2
[PATCH] tftp-hpa: add error check for disk filled up
From: "Roy.Li" <rongqing.li at windriver.com> Add error check when the write-buffer is finally flushed to the file, the caller can detect if the disk filled up (or had an i/o error) and return a NOSAPCE nak to the other side. Signed-off-by: Ming Liu <ming.liu at windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Roy.Li <rongqing.li at windriver.com> --- common/tftpsubs.c | 8 +++++---
2013 Oct 25
1
Shutdown problem with Mecer 1000VA Online UPS
Hi, They say one should never argue with people that know more than you, so please bear with me. On 2013/10/24 09:47 PM, hyouko at gmail.com wrote: > The driver is expecting either 'ACK' or no reply at all in case of > success and the command itself echoed back in case of errors. > On the other hand, your UPS replies '(ACK' in case of success and > '(NAK' on
2018 Aug 28
1
Fwd: Forward of moderated message
[forwarded without attachments, for real this time] > Begin forwarded message: > > From: Gabriele TAORMINA <gabriele.taormina at legrand.com <mailto:gabriele.taormina at legrand.com>> > Subject: Re: [Nut-upsdev] Adding drivers to NUT? > Date: August 27, 2018 at 6:03:55 AM EDT > To: Daniele Pezzini <hyouko at gmail.com <mailto:hyouko at gmail.com>> >
2013 Oct 24
0
Shutdown problem with Mecer 1000VA Online UPS
Hi Johan, The driver is expecting either 'ACK' or no reply at all in case of success and the command itself echoed back in case of errors. On the other hand, your UPS replies '(ACK' in case of success and '(NAK' on failure. So.. when the driver first tries to stop pending shutdowns and you get the 'operation not permitted' error, the driver interprets it as a